Cargando…

Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance as Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Among cochlear implant candidates, an increasing number of patients are presenting with residual acoustic hearing. To monitor the postoperative course of structural and functional preservation of the cochlea, a reliable objective biomarker would be desirable. Recently, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wimmer, Wilhelm, Sclabas, Luca, Caversaccio, Marco, Weder, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35832176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.886171
_version_ 1784744742157811712
author Wimmer, Wilhelm
Sclabas, Luca
Caversaccio, Marco
Weder, Stefan
author_facet Wimmer, Wilhelm
Sclabas, Luca
Caversaccio, Marco
Weder, Stefan
author_sort Wimmer, Wilhelm
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Among cochlear implant candidates, an increasing number of patients are presenting with residual acoustic hearing. To monitor the postoperative course of structural and functional preservation of the cochlea, a reliable objective biomarker would be desirable. Recently, impedance telemetry has gained increasing attention in this field. The aim of this study was to investigate the postoperative course of the residual acoustic hearing and clinical impedance in patients with long electrode arrays and to explore the applicability of impedance telemetry for monitoring residual hearing. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed records of 42 cochlear implant recipients with residual hearing covering a median postoperative follow-up of 25 months with repeated simultaneous pure tone audiometry and impedance telemetry. We used a linear mixed-effects model to estimate the relation between clinical electrode impedance and residual hearing. Besides the clinical impedance, the follow-up time, side of implantation, gender, and age at implantation were included as fixed effects. An interaction term between impedance and follow-up time, as well as subject-level random intercepts and slopes, were included. RESULTS: Loss of residual hearing occurred either during surgery or within the first 6 post-operative months. Electrode contacts inserted further apically (i.e., deeper) had higher impedances, independent of residual hearing. The highest impedances were measured 1 month postoperatively and gradually decreased over time. Basal electrodes were more likely to maintain higher impedance. Follow-up time was significantly associated with residual hearing. Regardless of the time, we found that a 1 kΩ increase in clinical impedance was associated with a 4.4 dB deterioration of residual hearing (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pure tone audiometry is the current gold standard for monitoring postoperative residual hearing. However, the association of clinical impedances with residual hearing thresholds found in our study could potentially be exploited for objective monitoring using impedance telemetry. Further analysis including near-field related impedance components could be performed for improved specificity to local immune responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9271767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92717672022-07-12 Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance as Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing Wimmer, Wilhelm Sclabas, Luca Caversaccio, Marco Weder, Stefan Front Neurol Neurology INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Among cochlear implant candidates, an increasing number of patients are presenting with residual acoustic hearing. To monitor the postoperative course of structural and functional preservation of the cochlea, a reliable objective biomarker would be desirable. Recently, impedance telemetry has gained increasing attention in this field. The aim of this study was to investigate the postoperative course of the residual acoustic hearing and clinical impedance in patients with long electrode arrays and to explore the applicability of impedance telemetry for monitoring residual hearing. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed records of 42 cochlear implant recipients with residual hearing covering a median postoperative follow-up of 25 months with repeated simultaneous pure tone audiometry and impedance telemetry. We used a linear mixed-effects model to estimate the relation between clinical electrode impedance and residual hearing. Besides the clinical impedance, the follow-up time, side of implantation, gender, and age at implantation were included as fixed effects. An interaction term between impedance and follow-up time, as well as subject-level random intercepts and slopes, were included. RESULTS: Loss of residual hearing occurred either during surgery or within the first 6 post-operative months. Electrode contacts inserted further apically (i.e., deeper) had higher impedances, independent of residual hearing. The highest impedances were measured 1 month postoperatively and gradually decreased over time. Basal electrodes were more likely to maintain higher impedance. Follow-up time was significantly associated with residual hearing. Regardless of the time, we found that a 1 kΩ increase in clinical impedance was associated with a 4.4 dB deterioration of residual hearing (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pure tone audiometry is the current gold standard for monitoring postoperative residual hearing. However, the association of clinical impedances with residual hearing thresholds found in our study could potentially be exploited for objective monitoring using impedance telemetry. Further analysis including near-field related impedance components could be performed for improved specificity to local immune responses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9271767/ /pubmed/35832176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.886171 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wimmer, Sclabas, Caversaccio and Weder. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Wimmer, Wilhelm
Sclabas, Luca
Caversaccio, Marco
Weder, Stefan
Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance as Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing
title Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance as Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing
title_full Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance as Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing
title_fullStr Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance as Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing
title_full_unstemmed Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance as Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing
title_short Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance as Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing
title_sort cochlear implant electrode impedance as potential biomarker for residual hearing
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9271767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35832176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.886171
work_keys_str_mv AT wimmerwilhelm cochlearimplantelectrodeimpedanceaspotentialbiomarkerforresidualhearing
AT sclabasluca cochlearimplantelectrodeimpedanceaspotentialbiomarkerforresidualhearing
AT caversacciomarco cochlearimplantelectrodeimpedanceaspotentialbiomarkerforresidualhearing
AT wederstefan cochlearimplantelectrodeimpedanceaspotentialbiomarkerforresidualhearing