Cargando…
Evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records
OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of using electronic health record (EHR) derived clinical data within an active surveillance setting to evaluate the safety of a novel intervertebral body implant (IVBI) stabilization device. DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal observational cohort study comparin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35909993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000125 |
_version_ | 1784744822025748480 |
---|---|
author | Frankenberger, Edward A Resnic, Frederic S Ssemaganda, Henry Robbins, Susan Dunbar, Melissa R Coplan, Paul Zhang, Shumin Bruno, Cortney Maltenfort, Mitchell Benedetti, Jillian B Matheny, Michael E Ghogawala, Zoher |
author_facet | Frankenberger, Edward A Resnic, Frederic S Ssemaganda, Henry Robbins, Susan Dunbar, Melissa R Coplan, Paul Zhang, Shumin Bruno, Cortney Maltenfort, Mitchell Benedetti, Jillian B Matheny, Michael E Ghogawala, Zoher |
author_sort | Frankenberger, Edward A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of using electronic health record (EHR) derived clinical data within an active surveillance setting to evaluate the safety of a novel intervertebral body implant (IVBI) stabilization device. DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal observational cohort study comparing clinical outcomes for patients seen through 1 year following spinal fusion surgery. SETTING: Lahey Health network, which includes academic tertiary hospitals, outpatient clinics, and independent provider offices in the New England region of the USA. PARTICIPANTS: All spine surgery patients aged 18 or older who underwent thoracic or lumbar spinal arthrodesis surgeries were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The clinical outcomes of patients treated with the CONCORDE Bullet (CB) interbody spine system (DePuy) between April 2015 and December 2018 were compared with those patients receiving alternative spine stabilization interbody device implants. The primary endpoint was reoperation rate at 1 year, with secondary endpoints including the requirement for blood transfusion during index hospitalization, 1 year rate of any cause hospitalization, 1 year rate of surgical site infection, and mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: Among the 606 patients undergoing thoracic or lumbar spinal fusion surgery during the study period, 136 received only the CB. In comparison with patients who did not receive the CB, no significant differences were found in the rate of reoperation at 1 year or the rates of secondary safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Data derived from the EHR can be successfully leveraged to assess the safety of IVBI devices, in this case demonstrating no significant differences in the rates of risk-adjusted safety endpoints between patients undergoing spinal surgery with the CB as compared with alternative spinal implants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9272102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92721022022-07-28 Evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records Frankenberger, Edward A Resnic, Frederic S Ssemaganda, Henry Robbins, Susan Dunbar, Melissa R Coplan, Paul Zhang, Shumin Bruno, Cortney Maltenfort, Mitchell Benedetti, Jillian B Matheny, Michael E Ghogawala, Zoher BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol Original Research OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of using electronic health record (EHR) derived clinical data within an active surveillance setting to evaluate the safety of a novel intervertebral body implant (IVBI) stabilization device. DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal observational cohort study comparing clinical outcomes for patients seen through 1 year following spinal fusion surgery. SETTING: Lahey Health network, which includes academic tertiary hospitals, outpatient clinics, and independent provider offices in the New England region of the USA. PARTICIPANTS: All spine surgery patients aged 18 or older who underwent thoracic or lumbar spinal arthrodesis surgeries were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The clinical outcomes of patients treated with the CONCORDE Bullet (CB) interbody spine system (DePuy) between April 2015 and December 2018 were compared with those patients receiving alternative spine stabilization interbody device implants. The primary endpoint was reoperation rate at 1 year, with secondary endpoints including the requirement for blood transfusion during index hospitalization, 1 year rate of any cause hospitalization, 1 year rate of surgical site infection, and mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: Among the 606 patients undergoing thoracic or lumbar spinal fusion surgery during the study period, 136 received only the CB. In comparison with patients who did not receive the CB, no significant differences were found in the rate of reoperation at 1 year or the rates of secondary safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Data derived from the EHR can be successfully leveraged to assess the safety of IVBI devices, in this case demonstrating no significant differences in the rates of risk-adjusted safety endpoints between patients undergoing spinal surgery with the CB as compared with alternative spinal implants. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9272102/ /pubmed/35909993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000125 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Frankenberger, Edward A Resnic, Frederic S Ssemaganda, Henry Robbins, Susan Dunbar, Melissa R Coplan, Paul Zhang, Shumin Bruno, Cortney Maltenfort, Mitchell Benedetti, Jillian B Matheny, Michael E Ghogawala, Zoher Evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records |
title | Evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records |
title_full | Evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records |
title_short | Evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records |
title_sort | evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35909993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frankenbergeredwarda evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords AT resnicfrederics evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords AT ssemagandahenry evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords AT robbinssusan evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords AT dunbarmelissar evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords AT coplanpaul evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords AT zhangshumin evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords AT brunocortney evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords AT maltenfortmitchell evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords AT benedettijillianb evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords AT mathenymichaele evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords AT ghogawalazoher evaluationofintervertebralbodyimplantperformanceusingactivesurveillanceofelectronichealthrecords |