Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens

Prevention of necrotic enteritis (NE), caused by Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens), is one of the most important goals to improve the profitability of broiler chickens. This work aimed to compare the efficacy of 2 antibiotic alternatives including a postbiotic (dry feed additive and aqueous n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abd El-Ghany, Wafaa A., Abdel-Latif, Mervat A., Hosny, Fouad, Alatfeehy, Nayera M., Noreldin, Ahmed E., Quesnell, Rebecca R., Chapman, Robert, Sakai, Lisa, Elbestawy, Ahmed R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35809347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101988
_version_ 1784744861459546112
author Abd El-Ghany, Wafaa A.
Abdel-Latif, Mervat A.
Hosny, Fouad
Alatfeehy, Nayera M.
Noreldin, Ahmed E.
Quesnell, Rebecca R.
Chapman, Robert
Sakai, Lisa
Elbestawy, Ahmed R.
author_facet Abd El-Ghany, Wafaa A.
Abdel-Latif, Mervat A.
Hosny, Fouad
Alatfeehy, Nayera M.
Noreldin, Ahmed E.
Quesnell, Rebecca R.
Chapman, Robert
Sakai, Lisa
Elbestawy, Ahmed R.
author_sort Abd El-Ghany, Wafaa A.
collection PubMed
description Prevention of necrotic enteritis (NE), caused by Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens), is one of the most important goals to improve the profitability of broiler chickens. This work aimed to compare the efficacy of 2 antibiotic alternatives including a postbiotic (dry feed additive and aqueous nonviable Lactobacillus (L.) species fermentation) and a probiotic (dry feed additive and aqueous Bacillus (B.) subtilis and B. lischeniformis mixture) with an antibiotic (amoxicillin in water) against NE. Four hundred, day-old broiler chicks were divided into 8 equal groups (Gs), n = 50 each (5 replicates; 10 each). Chickens of G1 (postbiotic dry-feed additive), G2 (postbiotic and antibiotic in drinking water), G3 (postbiotic dry and aqueous), G4 (probiotic dry-feed additive), G5 (probiotic and antibiotic in drinking water), G6 (probiotic dry and aqueous), and G7 (nontreated) were orally inoculated with a toxigenic C. perfringens type A on the d 19 to 21 of age and predisposed with 3X coccidial vaccine for induction of NE. However, chickens of G8 were kept nontreated or challenged. The severity of NE signs was markedly decreased in G3 in comparison with other challenged treatment groups, and the mortality rates were 22%, 10%, 16%, 22%, 12%, 20%, and 36% in Gs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, respectively. The best significant (P ≤ 0.05) feed conversion ratio was detected in G3 (1.51), G6 (1.54), and G2 and G8 (1.61). In addition, the European production efficiency factor was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) improved in G3 (279.33) and G2 (266.67), but it was decreased in G7 (177.33) when compared with G8 (339.33). An improvement in intestinal and hepatic pathology and liver function tests, as well as a significant (P ≤ 0.05) decrease in bacterial counts were observed in Gs 2, 5, 3, 6, 1, and 4, respectively in comparison with G7. Immunologically, the highest significant (P ≤ 0.05) hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers for Newcastle disease virus vaccine were in Gs 1 and 3 (6.4 log(2)). In conclusion, the combined feed and water postbiotic treatment demonstrated promising results in ameliorating the severity of NE and improving the hepatic and the immune status of broiler chickens when compared with the commonly used probiotic and antibiotic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9272375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92723752022-07-12 Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens Abd El-Ghany, Wafaa A. Abdel-Latif, Mervat A. Hosny, Fouad Alatfeehy, Nayera M. Noreldin, Ahmed E. Quesnell, Rebecca R. Chapman, Robert Sakai, Lisa Elbestawy, Ahmed R. Poult Sci IMMUNOLOGY, HEALTH AND DISEASE Prevention of necrotic enteritis (NE), caused by Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens), is one of the most important goals to improve the profitability of broiler chickens. This work aimed to compare the efficacy of 2 antibiotic alternatives including a postbiotic (dry feed additive and aqueous nonviable Lactobacillus (L.) species fermentation) and a probiotic (dry feed additive and aqueous Bacillus (B.) subtilis and B. lischeniformis mixture) with an antibiotic (amoxicillin in water) against NE. Four hundred, day-old broiler chicks were divided into 8 equal groups (Gs), n = 50 each (5 replicates; 10 each). Chickens of G1 (postbiotic dry-feed additive), G2 (postbiotic and antibiotic in drinking water), G3 (postbiotic dry and aqueous), G4 (probiotic dry-feed additive), G5 (probiotic and antibiotic in drinking water), G6 (probiotic dry and aqueous), and G7 (nontreated) were orally inoculated with a toxigenic C. perfringens type A on the d 19 to 21 of age and predisposed with 3X coccidial vaccine for induction of NE. However, chickens of G8 were kept nontreated or challenged. The severity of NE signs was markedly decreased in G3 in comparison with other challenged treatment groups, and the mortality rates were 22%, 10%, 16%, 22%, 12%, 20%, and 36% in Gs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, respectively. The best significant (P ≤ 0.05) feed conversion ratio was detected in G3 (1.51), G6 (1.54), and G2 and G8 (1.61). In addition, the European production efficiency factor was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) improved in G3 (279.33) and G2 (266.67), but it was decreased in G7 (177.33) when compared with G8 (339.33). An improvement in intestinal and hepatic pathology and liver function tests, as well as a significant (P ≤ 0.05) decrease in bacterial counts were observed in Gs 2, 5, 3, 6, 1, and 4, respectively in comparison with G7. Immunologically, the highest significant (P ≤ 0.05) hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers for Newcastle disease virus vaccine were in Gs 1 and 3 (6.4 log(2)). In conclusion, the combined feed and water postbiotic treatment demonstrated promising results in ameliorating the severity of NE and improving the hepatic and the immune status of broiler chickens when compared with the commonly used probiotic and antibiotic. Elsevier 2022-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9272375/ /pubmed/35809347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101988 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle IMMUNOLOGY, HEALTH AND DISEASE
Abd El-Ghany, Wafaa A.
Abdel-Latif, Mervat A.
Hosny, Fouad
Alatfeehy, Nayera M.
Noreldin, Ahmed E.
Quesnell, Rebecca R.
Chapman, Robert
Sakai, Lisa
Elbestawy, Ahmed R.
Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens
title Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens
title_full Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens
title_short Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens
title_sort comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens
topic IMMUNOLOGY, HEALTH AND DISEASE
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35809347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101988
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelghanywafaaa comparativeefficacyofpostbioticprobioticandantibioticagainstnecroticenteritisinbroilerchickens
AT abdellatifmervata comparativeefficacyofpostbioticprobioticandantibioticagainstnecroticenteritisinbroilerchickens
AT hosnyfouad comparativeefficacyofpostbioticprobioticandantibioticagainstnecroticenteritisinbroilerchickens
AT alatfeehynayeram comparativeefficacyofpostbioticprobioticandantibioticagainstnecroticenteritisinbroilerchickens
AT noreldinahmede comparativeefficacyofpostbioticprobioticandantibioticagainstnecroticenteritisinbroilerchickens
AT quesnellrebeccar comparativeefficacyofpostbioticprobioticandantibioticagainstnecroticenteritisinbroilerchickens
AT chapmanrobert comparativeefficacyofpostbioticprobioticandantibioticagainstnecroticenteritisinbroilerchickens
AT sakailisa comparativeefficacyofpostbioticprobioticandantibioticagainstnecroticenteritisinbroilerchickens
AT elbestawyahmedr comparativeefficacyofpostbioticprobioticandantibioticagainstnecroticenteritisinbroilerchickens