Cargando…

Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings

PCR-based diagnostics generally require nucleic acid extraction from patient specimens prior to amplification. As highlighted early in the COVID-19 pandemic, extraction steps may be difficult to scale during times of massive demand and limited reagent supply. Forgoing an extraction step, we previous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Victoriano, Christia M., Pask, Megan E., Malofsky, Nicole A., Seegmiller, Adam, Simmons, Steve, Schmitz, Jonathan E., Haselton, Frederick R., Adams, Nicholas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35817781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15356-7
_version_ 1784744960611844096
author Victoriano, Christia M.
Pask, Megan E.
Malofsky, Nicole A.
Seegmiller, Adam
Simmons, Steve
Schmitz, Jonathan E.
Haselton, Frederick R.
Adams, Nicholas M.
author_facet Victoriano, Christia M.
Pask, Megan E.
Malofsky, Nicole A.
Seegmiller, Adam
Simmons, Steve
Schmitz, Jonathan E.
Haselton, Frederick R.
Adams, Nicholas M.
author_sort Victoriano, Christia M.
collection PubMed
description PCR-based diagnostics generally require nucleic acid extraction from patient specimens prior to amplification. As highlighted early in the COVID-19 pandemic, extraction steps may be difficult to scale during times of massive demand and limited reagent supply. Forgoing an extraction step, we previously reported that the N1 primer/probe-set of the widespread CDC COVID-19 assay maintains high categorical sensitivity (95%) and specificity (100%) with direct inoculation of viral transport media (VTM) into qRT-PCR reactions. In contrast, the N2 set demonstrated a prominent C(t) delay and low sensitivity (33%) without extraction. In the current study, we have improved the performance of this modified CDC assay (in particular the N2 set) by incorporating N1/N2/RNase P multiplexing and dissecting the effects of annealing temperature, VTM interference, and inoculum volume. The latter two factors exerted a more prominent effect on the performance of N2 than N1, although these effects were largely overcome through elevated annealing temperature. This unextracted/multiplex protocol was evaluated with 41 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 43 negative clinical samples, demonstrating a categorical sensitivity of 92.7% and specificity of 100% versus the unmodified CDC methodology. Overall, this work offers a generalizable strategy to maximize testing capabilities for COVID-19 or other emerging pathogens when resources are constrained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9272867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92728672022-07-11 Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings Victoriano, Christia M. Pask, Megan E. Malofsky, Nicole A. Seegmiller, Adam Simmons, Steve Schmitz, Jonathan E. Haselton, Frederick R. Adams, Nicholas M. Sci Rep Article PCR-based diagnostics generally require nucleic acid extraction from patient specimens prior to amplification. As highlighted early in the COVID-19 pandemic, extraction steps may be difficult to scale during times of massive demand and limited reagent supply. Forgoing an extraction step, we previously reported that the N1 primer/probe-set of the widespread CDC COVID-19 assay maintains high categorical sensitivity (95%) and specificity (100%) with direct inoculation of viral transport media (VTM) into qRT-PCR reactions. In contrast, the N2 set demonstrated a prominent C(t) delay and low sensitivity (33%) without extraction. In the current study, we have improved the performance of this modified CDC assay (in particular the N2 set) by incorporating N1/N2/RNase P multiplexing and dissecting the effects of annealing temperature, VTM interference, and inoculum volume. The latter two factors exerted a more prominent effect on the performance of N2 than N1, although these effects were largely overcome through elevated annealing temperature. This unextracted/multiplex protocol was evaluated with 41 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 43 negative clinical samples, demonstrating a categorical sensitivity of 92.7% and specificity of 100% versus the unmodified CDC methodology. Overall, this work offers a generalizable strategy to maximize testing capabilities for COVID-19 or other emerging pathogens when resources are constrained. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9272867/ /pubmed/35817781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15356-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Victoriano, Christia M.
Pask, Megan E.
Malofsky, Nicole A.
Seegmiller, Adam
Simmons, Steve
Schmitz, Jonathan E.
Haselton, Frederick R.
Adams, Nicholas M.
Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings
title Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings
title_full Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings
title_fullStr Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings
title_full_unstemmed Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings
title_short Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings
title_sort direct pcr with the cdc 2019 sars-cov-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35817781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15356-7
work_keys_str_mv AT victorianochristiam directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings
AT paskmegane directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings
AT malofskynicolea directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings
AT seegmilleradam directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings
AT simmonssteve directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings
AT schmitzjonathane directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings
AT haseltonfrederickr directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings
AT adamsnicholasm directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings