Cargando…
Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings
PCR-based diagnostics generally require nucleic acid extraction from patient specimens prior to amplification. As highlighted early in the COVID-19 pandemic, extraction steps may be difficult to scale during times of massive demand and limited reagent supply. Forgoing an extraction step, we previous...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35817781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15356-7 |
_version_ | 1784744960611844096 |
---|---|
author | Victoriano, Christia M. Pask, Megan E. Malofsky, Nicole A. Seegmiller, Adam Simmons, Steve Schmitz, Jonathan E. Haselton, Frederick R. Adams, Nicholas M. |
author_facet | Victoriano, Christia M. Pask, Megan E. Malofsky, Nicole A. Seegmiller, Adam Simmons, Steve Schmitz, Jonathan E. Haselton, Frederick R. Adams, Nicholas M. |
author_sort | Victoriano, Christia M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PCR-based diagnostics generally require nucleic acid extraction from patient specimens prior to amplification. As highlighted early in the COVID-19 pandemic, extraction steps may be difficult to scale during times of massive demand and limited reagent supply. Forgoing an extraction step, we previously reported that the N1 primer/probe-set of the widespread CDC COVID-19 assay maintains high categorical sensitivity (95%) and specificity (100%) with direct inoculation of viral transport media (VTM) into qRT-PCR reactions. In contrast, the N2 set demonstrated a prominent C(t) delay and low sensitivity (33%) without extraction. In the current study, we have improved the performance of this modified CDC assay (in particular the N2 set) by incorporating N1/N2/RNase P multiplexing and dissecting the effects of annealing temperature, VTM interference, and inoculum volume. The latter two factors exerted a more prominent effect on the performance of N2 than N1, although these effects were largely overcome through elevated annealing temperature. This unextracted/multiplex protocol was evaluated with 41 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 43 negative clinical samples, demonstrating a categorical sensitivity of 92.7% and specificity of 100% versus the unmodified CDC methodology. Overall, this work offers a generalizable strategy to maximize testing capabilities for COVID-19 or other emerging pathogens when resources are constrained. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9272867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92728672022-07-11 Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings Victoriano, Christia M. Pask, Megan E. Malofsky, Nicole A. Seegmiller, Adam Simmons, Steve Schmitz, Jonathan E. Haselton, Frederick R. Adams, Nicholas M. Sci Rep Article PCR-based diagnostics generally require nucleic acid extraction from patient specimens prior to amplification. As highlighted early in the COVID-19 pandemic, extraction steps may be difficult to scale during times of massive demand and limited reagent supply. Forgoing an extraction step, we previously reported that the N1 primer/probe-set of the widespread CDC COVID-19 assay maintains high categorical sensitivity (95%) and specificity (100%) with direct inoculation of viral transport media (VTM) into qRT-PCR reactions. In contrast, the N2 set demonstrated a prominent C(t) delay and low sensitivity (33%) without extraction. In the current study, we have improved the performance of this modified CDC assay (in particular the N2 set) by incorporating N1/N2/RNase P multiplexing and dissecting the effects of annealing temperature, VTM interference, and inoculum volume. The latter two factors exerted a more prominent effect on the performance of N2 than N1, although these effects were largely overcome through elevated annealing temperature. This unextracted/multiplex protocol was evaluated with 41 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 43 negative clinical samples, demonstrating a categorical sensitivity of 92.7% and specificity of 100% versus the unmodified CDC methodology. Overall, this work offers a generalizable strategy to maximize testing capabilities for COVID-19 or other emerging pathogens when resources are constrained. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9272867/ /pubmed/35817781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15356-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Victoriano, Christia M. Pask, Megan E. Malofsky, Nicole A. Seegmiller, Adam Simmons, Steve Schmitz, Jonathan E. Haselton, Frederick R. Adams, Nicholas M. Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings |
title | Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings |
title_full | Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings |
title_fullStr | Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings |
title_short | Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings |
title_sort | direct pcr with the cdc 2019 sars-cov-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35817781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15356-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT victorianochristiam directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings AT paskmegane directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings AT malofskynicolea directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings AT seegmilleradam directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings AT simmonssteve directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings AT schmitzjonathane directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings AT haseltonfrederickr directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings AT adamsnicholasm directpcrwiththecdc2019sarscov2assayoptimizationforlimitedresourcesettings |