Cargando…

Is there different prognosis between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma in a propensity score matching study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database?

BACKGROUND: There has been lack of guidance for stratify treatment between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EC) and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma (AC), therefore understanding the difference of prognosis between EC and AC is important for individualized therapy for these patients. METHODS: I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Fubin, Jin, Bohong, Yan, Hui, Zhu, Tianhong, Ding, Huiqing, Chen, Xueqin, Guan, Yutao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836529
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-1180
_version_ 1784745126144245760
author Zhang, Fubin
Jin, Bohong
Yan, Hui
Zhu, Tianhong
Ding, Huiqing
Chen, Xueqin
Guan, Yutao
author_facet Zhang, Fubin
Jin, Bohong
Yan, Hui
Zhu, Tianhong
Ding, Huiqing
Chen, Xueqin
Guan, Yutao
author_sort Zhang, Fubin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been lack of guidance for stratify treatment between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EC) and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma (AC), therefore understanding the difference of prognosis between EC and AC is important for individualized therapy for these patients. METHODS: In this study, we compare the survival outcomes between cervical EC and AC patients from the SEER database. we analyzed 2,554 patients for overall survival (OS) and 2,527 patients for disease-specific survival (DSS), Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted to analyze the survival outcomes of the AC and EC patients, a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to match patients and balance various factors, OS and DSS were analyzed among the subgroups before and after 1:1 PSM. RESULTS: In the unmatched cohort, in the multivariate analysis, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of OS (P=0.24) and DSS (P=0.20) between the EC and AC patients, The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 77.89% and 72.65% for the AC patients, and 83.38% and 75.64% for the EC patients respectively. The 3- and 5-year DSS rates were 84.93% and 79.69% for the EC patients, 83.97% and 76.78% for the AC patients, respectively. In the PSM cohort, 280 AC patients and 280 EC patients were included in the analysis of OS. 273 AC patients and 275 EC patients were included in the analysis of DSS, the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the multivariate analysis also produced similar results for the unmatched groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in OS and DSS between the cervical EC and AC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9273663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92736632022-07-13 Is there different prognosis between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma in a propensity score matching study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database? Zhang, Fubin Jin, Bohong Yan, Hui Zhu, Tianhong Ding, Huiqing Chen, Xueqin Guan, Yutao Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: There has been lack of guidance for stratify treatment between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EC) and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma (AC), therefore understanding the difference of prognosis between EC and AC is important for individualized therapy for these patients. METHODS: In this study, we compare the survival outcomes between cervical EC and AC patients from the SEER database. we analyzed 2,554 patients for overall survival (OS) and 2,527 patients for disease-specific survival (DSS), Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted to analyze the survival outcomes of the AC and EC patients, a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to match patients and balance various factors, OS and DSS were analyzed among the subgroups before and after 1:1 PSM. RESULTS: In the unmatched cohort, in the multivariate analysis, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of OS (P=0.24) and DSS (P=0.20) between the EC and AC patients, The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 77.89% and 72.65% for the AC patients, and 83.38% and 75.64% for the EC patients respectively. The 3- and 5-year DSS rates were 84.93% and 79.69% for the EC patients, 83.97% and 76.78% for the AC patients, respectively. In the PSM cohort, 280 AC patients and 280 EC patients were included in the analysis of OS. 273 AC patients and 275 EC patients were included in the analysis of DSS, the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the multivariate analysis also produced similar results for the unmatched groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in OS and DSS between the cervical EC and AC patients. AME Publishing Company 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9273663/ /pubmed/35836529 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-1180 Text en 2022 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Fubin
Jin, Bohong
Yan, Hui
Zhu, Tianhong
Ding, Huiqing
Chen, Xueqin
Guan, Yutao
Is there different prognosis between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma in a propensity score matching study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database?
title Is there different prognosis between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma in a propensity score matching study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database?
title_full Is there different prognosis between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma in a propensity score matching study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database?
title_fullStr Is there different prognosis between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma in a propensity score matching study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database?
title_full_unstemmed Is there different prognosis between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma in a propensity score matching study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database?
title_short Is there different prognosis between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma in a propensity score matching study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database?
title_sort is there different prognosis between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma in a propensity score matching study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (seer) database?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836529
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-1180
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangfubin istheredifferentprognosisbetweencervicalendometrioidadenocarcinomaandordinarycervicaladenocarcinomainapropensityscorematchingstudybasedonthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase
AT jinbohong istheredifferentprognosisbetweencervicalendometrioidadenocarcinomaandordinarycervicaladenocarcinomainapropensityscorematchingstudybasedonthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase
AT yanhui istheredifferentprognosisbetweencervicalendometrioidadenocarcinomaandordinarycervicaladenocarcinomainapropensityscorematchingstudybasedonthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase
AT zhutianhong istheredifferentprognosisbetweencervicalendometrioidadenocarcinomaandordinarycervicaladenocarcinomainapropensityscorematchingstudybasedonthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase
AT dinghuiqing istheredifferentprognosisbetweencervicalendometrioidadenocarcinomaandordinarycervicaladenocarcinomainapropensityscorematchingstudybasedonthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase
AT chenxueqin istheredifferentprognosisbetweencervicalendometrioidadenocarcinomaandordinarycervicaladenocarcinomainapropensityscorematchingstudybasedonthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase
AT guanyutao istheredifferentprognosisbetweencervicalendometrioidadenocarcinomaandordinarycervicaladenocarcinomainapropensityscorematchingstudybasedonthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdatabase