Cargando…
The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options
BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa is manifested by painful abscesses and scarring of sweat glands. Axillary, inguinal and genital regions are mostly affected. Multiple options exist in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. The aim of this retrospective, mono-center cohort study was to analyz...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.867487 |
_version_ | 1784745177903005696 |
---|---|
author | Stumpfe, M. C. Horch, R. E. Arkudas, A. Cai, A. Müller-Seubert, W. Hauck, T. Ludolph, I. |
author_facet | Stumpfe, M. C. Horch, R. E. Arkudas, A. Cai, A. Müller-Seubert, W. Hauck, T. Ludolph, I. |
author_sort | Stumpfe, M. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa is manifested by painful abscesses and scarring of sweat glands. Axillary, inguinal and genital regions are mostly affected. Multiple options exist in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. The aim of this retrospective, mono-center cohort study was to analyze the outcome of different treatment methods after radical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the treatment strategy and recurrence rate of hidradenitis suppurativa. We included all eligible patients of legal age between February 2003 and October 2021, with the diagnosis of Hidradenitis suppurativa and the necessity for surgical treatment. All patients with surgical treatment and direct wound closure by suture were excluded. Bacterial load and flora were analyzed for primary and secondary reconstruction in combination with negative-pressure wound therapy. Patient data were analyzed for recurrence rate and remission time according to different reconstructive techniques. RESULTS: In 44 affected anatomical sites (n = 23 patients) we treated 15 patients with negative-pressure wound therapy. Bacterial load and flora were lower in the last wound swab of patients with multi-surgical procedures (22 localizations) compared to the first wound swab independent of the use of negative-pressure wound therapy. Wound closure, independent of a direct and multi-stage procedure was achieved by local fasciocutaneous flaps (n = 12), secondary intention healing (n = 7), secondary intention healing with buried chip skin grafts (n = 10), or split-thickness skin grafts (n = 15). Radical excision combined with split-thickness skin grafts showed the lowest recurrence rate in the follow-up (16%; n = 4). CONCLUSION: Radical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa as gold standard for surgical treatment combined with negative-pressure wound therapy as multi-stage procedures ultimately reduced bacterial load and flora in our study. The use of split-thickness skin grafts showed the lowest recurrence rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9273893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92738932022-07-13 The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options Stumpfe, M. C. Horch, R. E. Arkudas, A. Cai, A. Müller-Seubert, W. Hauck, T. Ludolph, I. Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa is manifested by painful abscesses and scarring of sweat glands. Axillary, inguinal and genital regions are mostly affected. Multiple options exist in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. The aim of this retrospective, mono-center cohort study was to analyze the outcome of different treatment methods after radical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the treatment strategy and recurrence rate of hidradenitis suppurativa. We included all eligible patients of legal age between February 2003 and October 2021, with the diagnosis of Hidradenitis suppurativa and the necessity for surgical treatment. All patients with surgical treatment and direct wound closure by suture were excluded. Bacterial load and flora were analyzed for primary and secondary reconstruction in combination with negative-pressure wound therapy. Patient data were analyzed for recurrence rate and remission time according to different reconstructive techniques. RESULTS: In 44 affected anatomical sites (n = 23 patients) we treated 15 patients with negative-pressure wound therapy. Bacterial load and flora were lower in the last wound swab of patients with multi-surgical procedures (22 localizations) compared to the first wound swab independent of the use of negative-pressure wound therapy. Wound closure, independent of a direct and multi-stage procedure was achieved by local fasciocutaneous flaps (n = 12), secondary intention healing (n = 7), secondary intention healing with buried chip skin grafts (n = 10), or split-thickness skin grafts (n = 15). Radical excision combined with split-thickness skin grafts showed the lowest recurrence rate in the follow-up (16%; n = 4). CONCLUSION: Radical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa as gold standard for surgical treatment combined with negative-pressure wound therapy as multi-stage procedures ultimately reduced bacterial load and flora in our study. The use of split-thickness skin grafts showed the lowest recurrence rate. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9273893/ /pubmed/35836613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.867487 Text en Copyright © 2022 Stumpfe, Horch, Arkudas, Cai, Mueller-Seubert, Hauck and Ludolph. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Stumpfe, M. C. Horch, R. E. Arkudas, A. Cai, A. Müller-Seubert, W. Hauck, T. Ludolph, I. The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options |
title | The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options |
title_full | The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options |
title_fullStr | The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options |
title_full_unstemmed | The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options |
title_short | The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options |
title_sort | value of negative-pressure wound therapy and flap surgery in hidradenitis suppurativa – a single center analysis of different treatment options |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.867487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stumpfemc thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT horchre thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT arkudasa thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT caia thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT mullerseubertw thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT hauckt thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT ludolphi thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT stumpfemc valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT horchre valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT arkudasa valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT caia valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT mullerseubertw valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT hauckt valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions AT ludolphi valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions |