Cargando…

The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa is manifested by painful abscesses and scarring of sweat glands. Axillary, inguinal and genital regions are mostly affected. Multiple options exist in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. The aim of this retrospective, mono-center cohort study was to analyz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stumpfe, M. C., Horch, R. E., Arkudas, A., Cai, A., Müller-Seubert, W., Hauck, T., Ludolph, I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.867487
_version_ 1784745177903005696
author Stumpfe, M. C.
Horch, R. E.
Arkudas, A.
Cai, A.
Müller-Seubert, W.
Hauck, T.
Ludolph, I.
author_facet Stumpfe, M. C.
Horch, R. E.
Arkudas, A.
Cai, A.
Müller-Seubert, W.
Hauck, T.
Ludolph, I.
author_sort Stumpfe, M. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa is manifested by painful abscesses and scarring of sweat glands. Axillary, inguinal and genital regions are mostly affected. Multiple options exist in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. The aim of this retrospective, mono-center cohort study was to analyze the outcome of different treatment methods after radical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the treatment strategy and recurrence rate of hidradenitis suppurativa. We included all eligible patients of legal age between February 2003 and October 2021, with the diagnosis of Hidradenitis suppurativa and the necessity for surgical treatment. All patients with surgical treatment and direct wound closure by suture were excluded. Bacterial load and flora were analyzed for primary and secondary reconstruction in combination with negative-pressure wound therapy. Patient data were analyzed for recurrence rate and remission time according to different reconstructive techniques. RESULTS: In 44 affected anatomical sites (n = 23 patients) we treated 15 patients with negative-pressure wound therapy. Bacterial load and flora were lower in the last wound swab of patients with multi-surgical procedures (22 localizations) compared to the first wound swab independent of the use of negative-pressure wound therapy. Wound closure, independent of a direct and multi-stage procedure was achieved by local fasciocutaneous flaps (n = 12), secondary intention healing (n = 7), secondary intention healing with buried chip skin grafts (n = 10), or split-thickness skin grafts (n = 15). Radical excision combined with split-thickness skin grafts showed the lowest recurrence rate in the follow-up (16%; n = 4). CONCLUSION: Radical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa as gold standard for surgical treatment combined with negative-pressure wound therapy as multi-stage procedures ultimately reduced bacterial load and flora in our study. The use of split-thickness skin grafts showed the lowest recurrence rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9273893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92738932022-07-13 The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options Stumpfe, M. C. Horch, R. E. Arkudas, A. Cai, A. Müller-Seubert, W. Hauck, T. Ludolph, I. Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa is manifested by painful abscesses and scarring of sweat glands. Axillary, inguinal and genital regions are mostly affected. Multiple options exist in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. The aim of this retrospective, mono-center cohort study was to analyze the outcome of different treatment methods after radical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the treatment strategy and recurrence rate of hidradenitis suppurativa. We included all eligible patients of legal age between February 2003 and October 2021, with the diagnosis of Hidradenitis suppurativa and the necessity for surgical treatment. All patients with surgical treatment and direct wound closure by suture were excluded. Bacterial load and flora were analyzed for primary and secondary reconstruction in combination with negative-pressure wound therapy. Patient data were analyzed for recurrence rate and remission time according to different reconstructive techniques. RESULTS: In 44 affected anatomical sites (n = 23 patients) we treated 15 patients with negative-pressure wound therapy. Bacterial load and flora were lower in the last wound swab of patients with multi-surgical procedures (22 localizations) compared to the first wound swab independent of the use of negative-pressure wound therapy. Wound closure, independent of a direct and multi-stage procedure was achieved by local fasciocutaneous flaps (n = 12), secondary intention healing (n = 7), secondary intention healing with buried chip skin grafts (n = 10), or split-thickness skin grafts (n = 15). Radical excision combined with split-thickness skin grafts showed the lowest recurrence rate in the follow-up (16%; n = 4). CONCLUSION: Radical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa as gold standard for surgical treatment combined with negative-pressure wound therapy as multi-stage procedures ultimately reduced bacterial load and flora in our study. The use of split-thickness skin grafts showed the lowest recurrence rate. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9273893/ /pubmed/35836613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.867487 Text en Copyright © 2022 Stumpfe, Horch, Arkudas, Cai, Mueller-Seubert, Hauck and Ludolph. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Stumpfe, M. C.
Horch, R. E.
Arkudas, A.
Cai, A.
Müller-Seubert, W.
Hauck, T.
Ludolph, I.
The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options
title The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options
title_full The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options
title_fullStr The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options
title_short The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa – A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options
title_sort value of negative-pressure wound therapy and flap surgery in hidradenitis suppurativa – a single center analysis of different treatment options
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.867487
work_keys_str_mv AT stumpfemc thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT horchre thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT arkudasa thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT caia thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT mullerseubertw thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT hauckt thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT ludolphi thevalueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT stumpfemc valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT horchre valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT arkudasa valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT caia valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT mullerseubertw valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT hauckt valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions
AT ludolphi valueofnegativepressurewoundtherapyandflapsurgeryinhidradenitissuppurativaasinglecenteranalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptions