Cargando…

Effects and utility of an online forward triage tool during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a mixed method study and patient perspectives, Switzerland

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects (quantitatively) and the utility (qualitatively) of a COVID-19 online forward triage tool (OFTT) in a pandemic context. DESIGN: A mixed method sequential explanatory study was employed. Quantitative data of all OFTT users, between 2 March 2020 and 12 May 2020, were c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michel, Janet, Mettler, Annette, Stuber, Raphael, Müller, Martin, Ricklin, Meret E, Jent, Philipp, Hautz, Wolf E, Sauter, Thomas C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059765
_version_ 1784745224846704640
author Michel, Janet
Mettler, Annette
Stuber, Raphael
Müller, Martin
Ricklin, Meret E
Jent, Philipp
Hautz, Wolf E
Sauter, Thomas C
author_facet Michel, Janet
Mettler, Annette
Stuber, Raphael
Müller, Martin
Ricklin, Meret E
Jent, Philipp
Hautz, Wolf E
Sauter, Thomas C
author_sort Michel, Janet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects (quantitatively) and the utility (qualitatively) of a COVID-19 online forward triage tool (OFTT) in a pandemic context. DESIGN: A mixed method sequential explanatory study was employed. Quantitative data of all OFTT users, between 2 March 2020 and 12 May 2020, were collected. Second, qualitative data were collected through key informant interviews (n=19) to explain the quantitative findings, explore tool utility, user experience and elicit recommendations. SETTING: The working group e-emergency medicine at the emergency department developed an OFTT, which was made available online. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included all users above the age of 18 that used the OFTT between 2 March 2020 and 12 May 2020. INTERVENTION: An OFTT that displayed the current test recommendations of the Federal Office of Public Health on whether someone needed testing for COVID-19 or not. No diagnosis was provided. RESULTS: In the study period, 6272 users consulted our OFTT; 40.2% (1626/4049) would have contacted a healthcare provider had the tool not existed. 560 participants consented to a follow-up survey and provided a valid email address. 31.4% (176/560) participants returned a complete follow-up questionnaire. 84.7% (149/176) followed the recommendations given. 41.5% (73/176) reported that their fear was allayed after using the tool. Qualitatively, seven overarching themes emerged namely (1) accessibility of tool, (2) user-friendliness of tool, (3) utility of tool as an information source, (4) utility of tool in allaying fear and anxiety, (5) utility of tool in medical decision-making (6) utility of tool in reducing the potential for onward transmissions and (7) utility of tool in reducing health system burden. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that a COVID-19 OFTT does not only reduce the health system burden but can also serve as an information source, reduce anxiety and fear, reduce potential for cross infections and facilitate medical decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9274020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92740202022-07-14 Effects and utility of an online forward triage tool during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a mixed method study and patient perspectives, Switzerland Michel, Janet Mettler, Annette Stuber, Raphael Müller, Martin Ricklin, Meret E Jent, Philipp Hautz, Wolf E Sauter, Thomas C BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects (quantitatively) and the utility (qualitatively) of a COVID-19 online forward triage tool (OFTT) in a pandemic context. DESIGN: A mixed method sequential explanatory study was employed. Quantitative data of all OFTT users, between 2 March 2020 and 12 May 2020, were collected. Second, qualitative data were collected through key informant interviews (n=19) to explain the quantitative findings, explore tool utility, user experience and elicit recommendations. SETTING: The working group e-emergency medicine at the emergency department developed an OFTT, which was made available online. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included all users above the age of 18 that used the OFTT between 2 March 2020 and 12 May 2020. INTERVENTION: An OFTT that displayed the current test recommendations of the Federal Office of Public Health on whether someone needed testing for COVID-19 or not. No diagnosis was provided. RESULTS: In the study period, 6272 users consulted our OFTT; 40.2% (1626/4049) would have contacted a healthcare provider had the tool not existed. 560 participants consented to a follow-up survey and provided a valid email address. 31.4% (176/560) participants returned a complete follow-up questionnaire. 84.7% (149/176) followed the recommendations given. 41.5% (73/176) reported that their fear was allayed after using the tool. Qualitatively, seven overarching themes emerged namely (1) accessibility of tool, (2) user-friendliness of tool, (3) utility of tool as an information source, (4) utility of tool in allaying fear and anxiety, (5) utility of tool in medical decision-making (6) utility of tool in reducing the potential for onward transmissions and (7) utility of tool in reducing health system burden. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that a COVID-19 OFTT does not only reduce the health system burden but can also serve as an information source, reduce anxiety and fear, reduce potential for cross infections and facilitate medical decision-making. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9274020/ /pubmed/35820749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059765 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Michel, Janet
Mettler, Annette
Stuber, Raphael
Müller, Martin
Ricklin, Meret E
Jent, Philipp
Hautz, Wolf E
Sauter, Thomas C
Effects and utility of an online forward triage tool during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a mixed method study and patient perspectives, Switzerland
title Effects and utility of an online forward triage tool during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a mixed method study and patient perspectives, Switzerland
title_full Effects and utility of an online forward triage tool during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a mixed method study and patient perspectives, Switzerland
title_fullStr Effects and utility of an online forward triage tool during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a mixed method study and patient perspectives, Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Effects and utility of an online forward triage tool during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a mixed method study and patient perspectives, Switzerland
title_short Effects and utility of an online forward triage tool during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a mixed method study and patient perspectives, Switzerland
title_sort effects and utility of an online forward triage tool during the sars-cov-2 pandemic: a mixed method study and patient perspectives, switzerland
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059765
work_keys_str_mv AT micheljanet effectsandutilityofanonlineforwardtriagetoolduringthesarscov2pandemicamixedmethodstudyandpatientperspectivesswitzerland
AT mettlerannette effectsandutilityofanonlineforwardtriagetoolduringthesarscov2pandemicamixedmethodstudyandpatientperspectivesswitzerland
AT stuberraphael effectsandutilityofanonlineforwardtriagetoolduringthesarscov2pandemicamixedmethodstudyandpatientperspectivesswitzerland
AT mullermartin effectsandutilityofanonlineforwardtriagetoolduringthesarscov2pandemicamixedmethodstudyandpatientperspectivesswitzerland
AT ricklinmerete effectsandutilityofanonlineforwardtriagetoolduringthesarscov2pandemicamixedmethodstudyandpatientperspectivesswitzerland
AT jentphilipp effectsandutilityofanonlineforwardtriagetoolduringthesarscov2pandemicamixedmethodstudyandpatientperspectivesswitzerland
AT hautzwolfe effectsandutilityofanonlineforwardtriagetoolduringthesarscov2pandemicamixedmethodstudyandpatientperspectivesswitzerland
AT sauterthomasc effectsandutilityofanonlineforwardtriagetoolduringthesarscov2pandemicamixedmethodstudyandpatientperspectivesswitzerland