Cargando…

Radiomic Machine Learning and External Validation Based on 3.0 T mpMRI for Prediction of Intraductal Carcinoma of Prostate With Different Proportion

PURPOSE: To assess the association of radiomics features based on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with the proportion of intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC-P) and validate the predictive models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included pre-treatment MR images of prostate cancer (PCa) with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Ling, Li, Zhengyan, Liang, Xu, Xu, Jingxu, Cai, Yusen, Huang, Chencui, Zhang, Mengni, Yao, Jin, Song, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35837116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.934291
_version_ 1784745238525378560
author Yang, Ling
Li, Zhengyan
Liang, Xu
Xu, Jingxu
Cai, Yusen
Huang, Chencui
Zhang, Mengni
Yao, Jin
Song, Bin
author_facet Yang, Ling
Li, Zhengyan
Liang, Xu
Xu, Jingxu
Cai, Yusen
Huang, Chencui
Zhang, Mengni
Yao, Jin
Song, Bin
author_sort Yang, Ling
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the association of radiomics features based on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with the proportion of intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC-P) and validate the predictive models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included pre-treatment MR images of prostate cancer (PCa) with IDC components of high proportion (≥10%, hpIDC-P), low proportion (<10%, lpIDC-P), and pure acinar adenocarcinoma (PAC) from our institution for training and internal validation and cooperated cohort for external validation. Normalized images of T2WI, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map, and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) sequences were used for radiomics modeling. The clinical model was built based on serum total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) and Gleason score (GS), and the integrated model was the combination of Rad-score and clinicopathological data. The discrimination ability was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) in the internal and external validation sets and compared by DeLong test. RESULTS: Overall, 97 patients with hpIDC-P, 87 lpIDC-P, and 78 PAC were included for training and internal validation, and 11, 16, and 19 patients for external validation. The integrated model for predicting hpIDC-P got the best ROC-AUC of 0.88 (95%CI = 0.83-0.93) in internal and 0.86 (95%CI = 0.72-1.0) in external validation, which both outperformed clinical models (AUC=0.78, 95% CI = 0.72-0.85, AUC=0.69, 95% CI = 0.5-0.85, respectively) based solely on GS, and the radiomics model (AUC=0.85, 95% CI = 0.79-0.91) was slightly inferior to the integrated model and better than the clinical model in internal dataset. The integrated model for predicting lpIDC-P outperformed both radiomics and clinical models in the internal dataset, while slightly inferior to the integrated model for predicting hpIDC-P. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics signature improved differentiation of both hpIDC-P and lpIDC-P versus PAC when compared with the clinical model based on Gleason score, and was validated in an external cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9274129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92741292022-07-13 Radiomic Machine Learning and External Validation Based on 3.0 T mpMRI for Prediction of Intraductal Carcinoma of Prostate With Different Proportion Yang, Ling Li, Zhengyan Liang, Xu Xu, Jingxu Cai, Yusen Huang, Chencui Zhang, Mengni Yao, Jin Song, Bin Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: To assess the association of radiomics features based on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with the proportion of intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC-P) and validate the predictive models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included pre-treatment MR images of prostate cancer (PCa) with IDC components of high proportion (≥10%, hpIDC-P), low proportion (<10%, lpIDC-P), and pure acinar adenocarcinoma (PAC) from our institution for training and internal validation and cooperated cohort for external validation. Normalized images of T2WI, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map, and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) sequences were used for radiomics modeling. The clinical model was built based on serum total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) and Gleason score (GS), and the integrated model was the combination of Rad-score and clinicopathological data. The discrimination ability was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) in the internal and external validation sets and compared by DeLong test. RESULTS: Overall, 97 patients with hpIDC-P, 87 lpIDC-P, and 78 PAC were included for training and internal validation, and 11, 16, and 19 patients for external validation. The integrated model for predicting hpIDC-P got the best ROC-AUC of 0.88 (95%CI = 0.83-0.93) in internal and 0.86 (95%CI = 0.72-1.0) in external validation, which both outperformed clinical models (AUC=0.78, 95% CI = 0.72-0.85, AUC=0.69, 95% CI = 0.5-0.85, respectively) based solely on GS, and the radiomics model (AUC=0.85, 95% CI = 0.79-0.91) was slightly inferior to the integrated model and better than the clinical model in internal dataset. The integrated model for predicting lpIDC-P outperformed both radiomics and clinical models in the internal dataset, while slightly inferior to the integrated model for predicting hpIDC-P. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics signature improved differentiation of both hpIDC-P and lpIDC-P versus PAC when compared with the clinical model based on Gleason score, and was validated in an external cohort. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9274129/ /pubmed/35837116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.934291 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yang, Li, Liang, Xu, Cai, Huang, Zhang, Yao and Song https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Yang, Ling
Li, Zhengyan
Liang, Xu
Xu, Jingxu
Cai, Yusen
Huang, Chencui
Zhang, Mengni
Yao, Jin
Song, Bin
Radiomic Machine Learning and External Validation Based on 3.0 T mpMRI for Prediction of Intraductal Carcinoma of Prostate With Different Proportion
title Radiomic Machine Learning and External Validation Based on 3.0 T mpMRI for Prediction of Intraductal Carcinoma of Prostate With Different Proportion
title_full Radiomic Machine Learning and External Validation Based on 3.0 T mpMRI for Prediction of Intraductal Carcinoma of Prostate With Different Proportion
title_fullStr Radiomic Machine Learning and External Validation Based on 3.0 T mpMRI for Prediction of Intraductal Carcinoma of Prostate With Different Proportion
title_full_unstemmed Radiomic Machine Learning and External Validation Based on 3.0 T mpMRI for Prediction of Intraductal Carcinoma of Prostate With Different Proportion
title_short Radiomic Machine Learning and External Validation Based on 3.0 T mpMRI for Prediction of Intraductal Carcinoma of Prostate With Different Proportion
title_sort radiomic machine learning and external validation based on 3.0 t mpmri for prediction of intraductal carcinoma of prostate with different proportion
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35837116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.934291
work_keys_str_mv AT yangling radiomicmachinelearningandexternalvalidationbasedon30tmpmriforpredictionofintraductalcarcinomaofprostatewithdifferentproportion
AT lizhengyan radiomicmachinelearningandexternalvalidationbasedon30tmpmriforpredictionofintraductalcarcinomaofprostatewithdifferentproportion
AT liangxu radiomicmachinelearningandexternalvalidationbasedon30tmpmriforpredictionofintraductalcarcinomaofprostatewithdifferentproportion
AT xujingxu radiomicmachinelearningandexternalvalidationbasedon30tmpmriforpredictionofintraductalcarcinomaofprostatewithdifferentproportion
AT caiyusen radiomicmachinelearningandexternalvalidationbasedon30tmpmriforpredictionofintraductalcarcinomaofprostatewithdifferentproportion
AT huangchencui radiomicmachinelearningandexternalvalidationbasedon30tmpmriforpredictionofintraductalcarcinomaofprostatewithdifferentproportion
AT zhangmengni radiomicmachinelearningandexternalvalidationbasedon30tmpmriforpredictionofintraductalcarcinomaofprostatewithdifferentproportion
AT yaojin radiomicmachinelearningandexternalvalidationbasedon30tmpmriforpredictionofintraductalcarcinomaofprostatewithdifferentproportion
AT songbin radiomicmachinelearningandexternalvalidationbasedon30tmpmriforpredictionofintraductalcarcinomaofprostatewithdifferentproportion