Cargando…

Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients presenting with falls are known to carry an extremely high risk of future fragility fractures. Current osteoporosis guidelines recommend using fracture risk calculators such as FRAX, QFracture or Garvan to guide management. However, they differ considerably in their input...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Todorov, Georgi, Brook, Susan, Quah Qin Xian, Nicole, Von Widekind, Sophia, Freudenthal, Bernard, Comninos, Alexander N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060282
_version_ 1784745323811307520
author Todorov, Georgi
Brook, Susan
Quah Qin Xian, Nicole
Von Widekind, Sophia
Freudenthal, Bernard
Comninos, Alexander N
author_facet Todorov, Georgi
Brook, Susan
Quah Qin Xian, Nicole
Von Widekind, Sophia
Freudenthal, Bernard
Comninos, Alexander N
author_sort Todorov, Georgi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients presenting with falls are known to carry an extremely high risk of future fragility fractures. Current osteoporosis guidelines recommend using fracture risk calculators such as FRAX, QFracture or Garvan to guide management. However, they differ considerably in their inputs and may therefore provide contrasting risk estimations in certain individuals. In this study, we compare these risk calculators in a high-risk cohort of elderly patients admitted to hospital with falls. DESIGN: Hospital-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: Secondary care, London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 120 consecutive elderly patients who had falls presenting to a single hospital over 4 months were collected. 10-year major and hip fracture risks were calculated using FRAX, QFracture and Garvan. 1-year major and hip fracture risks from QFracture were assessed against prospective incidence of fracture. RESULTS: Median 10-year major fracture risk was: FRAX 19.5%, QFracture 26.0%, Garvan 32.5%. Median 10-year hip fracture risk was: FRAX 9.6%, QFracture 21.1%, Garvan 6.5%. Correlation between FRAX and QFracture was r=0.672 for major, r=0.676 for hip fracture (both p<0.0001); FRAX and Garvan r=0.778 (p<0.0001) for major, r=0.128 (p=0.206) for hip fracture; QFracture and Garvan r=0.658 (p<0.0001) for major, r=0.318 (p<0.001) for hip fracture. QFracture 1-year predicted major and hip fracture rates were 1.8% and 1.2%, respectively, compared with actual rates of 2.1% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although strong correlations between calculators were observed in the study cohort, there were differences of up to 13% between estimated risks. QFracture captured several elderly-specific inputs not considered by other calculators and so projected higher fracture risk than the other calculators. QFracture provided 1-year fracture risks that were comparable with the prospective observed fracture incidence in the cohort. This study has important clinical implications for the use of fracture risk calculators to guide treatment decisions, particularly in the high-risk cohort of elderly patients admitted to hospital following falls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9274535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92745352022-07-28 Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study Todorov, Georgi Brook, Susan Quah Qin Xian, Nicole Von Widekind, Sophia Freudenthal, Bernard Comninos, Alexander N BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients presenting with falls are known to carry an extremely high risk of future fragility fractures. Current osteoporosis guidelines recommend using fracture risk calculators such as FRAX, QFracture or Garvan to guide management. However, they differ considerably in their inputs and may therefore provide contrasting risk estimations in certain individuals. In this study, we compare these risk calculators in a high-risk cohort of elderly patients admitted to hospital with falls. DESIGN: Hospital-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: Secondary care, London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 120 consecutive elderly patients who had falls presenting to a single hospital over 4 months were collected. 10-year major and hip fracture risks were calculated using FRAX, QFracture and Garvan. 1-year major and hip fracture risks from QFracture were assessed against prospective incidence of fracture. RESULTS: Median 10-year major fracture risk was: FRAX 19.5%, QFracture 26.0%, Garvan 32.5%. Median 10-year hip fracture risk was: FRAX 9.6%, QFracture 21.1%, Garvan 6.5%. Correlation between FRAX and QFracture was r=0.672 for major, r=0.676 for hip fracture (both p<0.0001); FRAX and Garvan r=0.778 (p<0.0001) for major, r=0.128 (p=0.206) for hip fracture; QFracture and Garvan r=0.658 (p<0.0001) for major, r=0.318 (p<0.001) for hip fracture. QFracture 1-year predicted major and hip fracture rates were 1.8% and 1.2%, respectively, compared with actual rates of 2.1% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although strong correlations between calculators were observed in the study cohort, there were differences of up to 13% between estimated risks. QFracture captured several elderly-specific inputs not considered by other calculators and so projected higher fracture risk than the other calculators. QFracture provided 1-year fracture risks that were comparable with the prospective observed fracture incidence in the cohort. This study has important clinical implications for the use of fracture risk calculators to guide treatment decisions, particularly in the high-risk cohort of elderly patients admitted to hospital following falls. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9274535/ /pubmed/35820750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060282 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Todorov, Georgi
Brook, Susan
Quah Qin Xian, Nicole
Von Widekind, Sophia
Freudenthal, Bernard
Comninos, Alexander N
Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
title Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
title_full Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
title_short Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
title_sort comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060282
work_keys_str_mv AT todorovgeorgi comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT brooksusan comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT quahqinxiannicole comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT vonwidekindsophia comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT freudenthalbernard comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT comninosalexandern comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy