Cargando…
Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients presenting with falls are known to carry an extremely high risk of future fragility fractures. Current osteoporosis guidelines recommend using fracture risk calculators such as FRAX, QFracture or Garvan to guide management. However, they differ considerably in their input...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060282 |
_version_ | 1784745323811307520 |
---|---|
author | Todorov, Georgi Brook, Susan Quah Qin Xian, Nicole Von Widekind, Sophia Freudenthal, Bernard Comninos, Alexander N |
author_facet | Todorov, Georgi Brook, Susan Quah Qin Xian, Nicole Von Widekind, Sophia Freudenthal, Bernard Comninos, Alexander N |
author_sort | Todorov, Georgi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients presenting with falls are known to carry an extremely high risk of future fragility fractures. Current osteoporosis guidelines recommend using fracture risk calculators such as FRAX, QFracture or Garvan to guide management. However, they differ considerably in their inputs and may therefore provide contrasting risk estimations in certain individuals. In this study, we compare these risk calculators in a high-risk cohort of elderly patients admitted to hospital with falls. DESIGN: Hospital-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: Secondary care, London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 120 consecutive elderly patients who had falls presenting to a single hospital over 4 months were collected. 10-year major and hip fracture risks were calculated using FRAX, QFracture and Garvan. 1-year major and hip fracture risks from QFracture were assessed against prospective incidence of fracture. RESULTS: Median 10-year major fracture risk was: FRAX 19.5%, QFracture 26.0%, Garvan 32.5%. Median 10-year hip fracture risk was: FRAX 9.6%, QFracture 21.1%, Garvan 6.5%. Correlation between FRAX and QFracture was r=0.672 for major, r=0.676 for hip fracture (both p<0.0001); FRAX and Garvan r=0.778 (p<0.0001) for major, r=0.128 (p=0.206) for hip fracture; QFracture and Garvan r=0.658 (p<0.0001) for major, r=0.318 (p<0.001) for hip fracture. QFracture 1-year predicted major and hip fracture rates were 1.8% and 1.2%, respectively, compared with actual rates of 2.1% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although strong correlations between calculators were observed in the study cohort, there were differences of up to 13% between estimated risks. QFracture captured several elderly-specific inputs not considered by other calculators and so projected higher fracture risk than the other calculators. QFracture provided 1-year fracture risks that were comparable with the prospective observed fracture incidence in the cohort. This study has important clinical implications for the use of fracture risk calculators to guide treatment decisions, particularly in the high-risk cohort of elderly patients admitted to hospital following falls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9274535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92745352022-07-28 Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study Todorov, Georgi Brook, Susan Quah Qin Xian, Nicole Von Widekind, Sophia Freudenthal, Bernard Comninos, Alexander N BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients presenting with falls are known to carry an extremely high risk of future fragility fractures. Current osteoporosis guidelines recommend using fracture risk calculators such as FRAX, QFracture or Garvan to guide management. However, they differ considerably in their inputs and may therefore provide contrasting risk estimations in certain individuals. In this study, we compare these risk calculators in a high-risk cohort of elderly patients admitted to hospital with falls. DESIGN: Hospital-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: Secondary care, London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 120 consecutive elderly patients who had falls presenting to a single hospital over 4 months were collected. 10-year major and hip fracture risks were calculated using FRAX, QFracture and Garvan. 1-year major and hip fracture risks from QFracture were assessed against prospective incidence of fracture. RESULTS: Median 10-year major fracture risk was: FRAX 19.5%, QFracture 26.0%, Garvan 32.5%. Median 10-year hip fracture risk was: FRAX 9.6%, QFracture 21.1%, Garvan 6.5%. Correlation between FRAX and QFracture was r=0.672 for major, r=0.676 for hip fracture (both p<0.0001); FRAX and Garvan r=0.778 (p<0.0001) for major, r=0.128 (p=0.206) for hip fracture; QFracture and Garvan r=0.658 (p<0.0001) for major, r=0.318 (p<0.001) for hip fracture. QFracture 1-year predicted major and hip fracture rates were 1.8% and 1.2%, respectively, compared with actual rates of 2.1% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although strong correlations between calculators were observed in the study cohort, there were differences of up to 13% between estimated risks. QFracture captured several elderly-specific inputs not considered by other calculators and so projected higher fracture risk than the other calculators. QFracture provided 1-year fracture risks that were comparable with the prospective observed fracture incidence in the cohort. This study has important clinical implications for the use of fracture risk calculators to guide treatment decisions, particularly in the high-risk cohort of elderly patients admitted to hospital following falls. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9274535/ /pubmed/35820750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060282 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Diabetes and Endocrinology Todorov, Georgi Brook, Susan Quah Qin Xian, Nicole Von Widekind, Sophia Freudenthal, Bernard Comninos, Alexander N Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study |
title | Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study |
title_full | Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study |
title_short | Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study |
title_sort | comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study |
topic | Diabetes and Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT todorovgeorgi comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT brooksusan comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT quahqinxiannicole comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT vonwidekindsophia comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT freudenthalbernard comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT comninosalexandern comparisonoffractureriskcalculatorsinelderlyfallersahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy |