Cargando…

Pathologic examination of the placenta and its benefits in treatment plan or follow-up of patients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The placental examination provides important information about the effect of maternal abnormalities on the placenta or the cause of preterm delivery, fetal growth restriction, or fetal neurodevelopmental damage. In this study, the frequency of placental pathologies of patients in a terti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akhavan, Setareh, Borna, Sedigheh, Abdollahi, Alireza, Shariat, Mamak, Zamani, Narges
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00743-7
_version_ 1784745327239102464
author Akhavan, Setareh
Borna, Sedigheh
Abdollahi, Alireza
Shariat, Mamak
Zamani, Narges
author_facet Akhavan, Setareh
Borna, Sedigheh
Abdollahi, Alireza
Shariat, Mamak
Zamani, Narges
author_sort Akhavan, Setareh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The placental examination provides important information about the effect of maternal abnormalities on the placenta or the cause of preterm delivery, fetal growth restriction, or fetal neurodevelopmental damage. In this study, the frequency of placental pathologies of patients in a tertiary hospital was investigated. METHODS: In this longitudinal and cross-sectional study, all removed placentas after any type of pregnancy termination referred to a pathological examination, within 1 year (2019–2020). All placentas were examined macroscopically and microscopically by two pathologists. RESULTS: Unfortunately, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of pregnant women in our hospital declined. A total of 258 placentas were examined. The type of delivery in 193 cases (79.4%) was cesarean section and 50 cases (20.6%) had a vaginal delivery. In the pathological assessment of placentas, 238 (92.2%) cases were normal and 20 cases (7.8%) were abnormal. Infarct and chorioamnionitis were the pathologies with higher frequencies (4.3% and 2.7%, respectively). Intra-uterine fetal death (p = 0.701), preeclampsia (p = 0.51) had no significant difference was seen in normal and abnormal placentas. Maternal age (p = 0.83), gestational age based on the last menstrual period (p = 0.38), and gestational age based on the first ultrasound (p = 0.78) did not show a significant relationship with any of the pathological complications categories. CONCLUSIONS: Pathological examination of the placenta from all live-birth deliveries is not worthwhile, and it’s recommended to modify the guidelines as to when the placenta is submitted for pathological evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9274628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92746282022-07-12 Pathologic examination of the placenta and its benefits in treatment plan or follow-up of patients: a cross-sectional study Akhavan, Setareh Borna, Sedigheh Abdollahi, Alireza Shariat, Mamak Zamani, Narges Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The placental examination provides important information about the effect of maternal abnormalities on the placenta or the cause of preterm delivery, fetal growth restriction, or fetal neurodevelopmental damage. In this study, the frequency of placental pathologies of patients in a tertiary hospital was investigated. METHODS: In this longitudinal and cross-sectional study, all removed placentas after any type of pregnancy termination referred to a pathological examination, within 1 year (2019–2020). All placentas were examined macroscopically and microscopically by two pathologists. RESULTS: Unfortunately, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of pregnant women in our hospital declined. A total of 258 placentas were examined. The type of delivery in 193 cases (79.4%) was cesarean section and 50 cases (20.6%) had a vaginal delivery. In the pathological assessment of placentas, 238 (92.2%) cases were normal and 20 cases (7.8%) were abnormal. Infarct and chorioamnionitis were the pathologies with higher frequencies (4.3% and 2.7%, respectively). Intra-uterine fetal death (p = 0.701), preeclampsia (p = 0.51) had no significant difference was seen in normal and abnormal placentas. Maternal age (p = 0.83), gestational age based on the last menstrual period (p = 0.38), and gestational age based on the first ultrasound (p = 0.78) did not show a significant relationship with any of the pathological complications categories. CONCLUSIONS: Pathological examination of the placenta from all live-birth deliveries is not worthwhile, and it’s recommended to modify the guidelines as to when the placenta is submitted for pathological evaluation. BioMed Central 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9274628/ /pubmed/35820933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00743-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Akhavan, Setareh
Borna, Sedigheh
Abdollahi, Alireza
Shariat, Mamak
Zamani, Narges
Pathologic examination of the placenta and its benefits in treatment plan or follow-up of patients: a cross-sectional study
title Pathologic examination of the placenta and its benefits in treatment plan or follow-up of patients: a cross-sectional study
title_full Pathologic examination of the placenta and its benefits in treatment plan or follow-up of patients: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Pathologic examination of the placenta and its benefits in treatment plan or follow-up of patients: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Pathologic examination of the placenta and its benefits in treatment plan or follow-up of patients: a cross-sectional study
title_short Pathologic examination of the placenta and its benefits in treatment plan or follow-up of patients: a cross-sectional study
title_sort pathologic examination of the placenta and its benefits in treatment plan or follow-up of patients: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00743-7
work_keys_str_mv AT akhavansetareh pathologicexaminationoftheplacentaanditsbenefitsintreatmentplanorfollowupofpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT bornasedigheh pathologicexaminationoftheplacentaanditsbenefitsintreatmentplanorfollowupofpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT abdollahialireza pathologicexaminationoftheplacentaanditsbenefitsintreatmentplanorfollowupofpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT shariatmamak pathologicexaminationoftheplacentaanditsbenefitsintreatmentplanorfollowupofpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT zamaninarges pathologicexaminationoftheplacentaanditsbenefitsintreatmentplanorfollowupofpatientsacrosssectionalstudy