Cargando…

An experience with Goel-Harms C1-C2 fixation for type II odontoid fractures

OBJECTIVE: Type II odontoid fractures need surgical stabilization for disabling neck pain and instability. Anterior odontoid screw fixation is a well-known technique. However, certain patients require posterior fixation. We present our surgical results and experiences with nine cases managed by the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Amit Kumar, Tawari, Manish, Rathore, Lavlesh, Sahana, Debabrata, Mishra, Harshit, Kumar, Sanjeev, Sahu, Rajiv Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35837432
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_22_22
_version_ 1784745340024389632
author Jain, Amit Kumar
Tawari, Manish
Rathore, Lavlesh
Sahana, Debabrata
Mishra, Harshit
Kumar, Sanjeev
Sahu, Rajiv Kumar
author_facet Jain, Amit Kumar
Tawari, Manish
Rathore, Lavlesh
Sahana, Debabrata
Mishra, Harshit
Kumar, Sanjeev
Sahu, Rajiv Kumar
author_sort Jain, Amit Kumar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Type II odontoid fractures need surgical stabilization for disabling neck pain and instability. Anterior odontoid screw fixation is a well-known technique. However, certain patients require posterior fixation. We present our surgical results and experiences with nine cases managed by the Goel-Harms technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of nine patients operated on between January 2019 and December 2021 for Type II odontoid fractures with posterior fixation technique. Their clinical profile was collected from case files. The radiological data were retrieved from radiology archives. The indications for surgery were instability and refractory neck pain. The surgical decision for posterior fixation was guided by fracture morphology. RESULTS: The mean age of presentation was 37.22 ± 9.85 years. Seven patients had Type II, and two had Type IIa odontoid fracture. All patients presented with unbearable neck pain. One patient had a quadriparesis. The fracture line was anterior-inferior sloping in six, posterior-inferior sloping in two, and transverse in one case. The anterior-posterior displacement of fracture ranged from 0 to 7 mm (mean 2.44 ± 2.18 mm). Partial transverse ligament tear without the Atlanto Axial Dislocation was present in three patients. The C1-C2 joint distraction was required in five cases. C1-C2 joint spacer was required in two cases. Following surgery, neck pain was relieved in all cases. Complete fracture alignment was achieved in eight patients. There were no postoperative complications. At the mean follow-up of 16.22 ± 9.61 months, there was no implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior C1-C2 fixation by the Goel-Harms technique is an excellent alternative to anterior fixation in selected cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9274684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92746842022-07-13 An experience with Goel-Harms C1-C2 fixation for type II odontoid fractures Jain, Amit Kumar Tawari, Manish Rathore, Lavlesh Sahana, Debabrata Mishra, Harshit Kumar, Sanjeev Sahu, Rajiv Kumar J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article OBJECTIVE: Type II odontoid fractures need surgical stabilization for disabling neck pain and instability. Anterior odontoid screw fixation is a well-known technique. However, certain patients require posterior fixation. We present our surgical results and experiences with nine cases managed by the Goel-Harms technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of nine patients operated on between January 2019 and December 2021 for Type II odontoid fractures with posterior fixation technique. Their clinical profile was collected from case files. The radiological data were retrieved from radiology archives. The indications for surgery were instability and refractory neck pain. The surgical decision for posterior fixation was guided by fracture morphology. RESULTS: The mean age of presentation was 37.22 ± 9.85 years. Seven patients had Type II, and two had Type IIa odontoid fracture. All patients presented with unbearable neck pain. One patient had a quadriparesis. The fracture line was anterior-inferior sloping in six, posterior-inferior sloping in two, and transverse in one case. The anterior-posterior displacement of fracture ranged from 0 to 7 mm (mean 2.44 ± 2.18 mm). Partial transverse ligament tear without the Atlanto Axial Dislocation was present in three patients. The C1-C2 joint distraction was required in five cases. C1-C2 joint spacer was required in two cases. Following surgery, neck pain was relieved in all cases. Complete fracture alignment was achieved in eight patients. There were no postoperative complications. At the mean follow-up of 16.22 ± 9.61 months, there was no implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior C1-C2 fixation by the Goel-Harms technique is an excellent alternative to anterior fixation in selected cases. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9274684/ /pubmed/35837432 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_22_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jain, Amit Kumar
Tawari, Manish
Rathore, Lavlesh
Sahana, Debabrata
Mishra, Harshit
Kumar, Sanjeev
Sahu, Rajiv Kumar
An experience with Goel-Harms C1-C2 fixation for type II odontoid fractures
title An experience with Goel-Harms C1-C2 fixation for type II odontoid fractures
title_full An experience with Goel-Harms C1-C2 fixation for type II odontoid fractures
title_fullStr An experience with Goel-Harms C1-C2 fixation for type II odontoid fractures
title_full_unstemmed An experience with Goel-Harms C1-C2 fixation for type II odontoid fractures
title_short An experience with Goel-Harms C1-C2 fixation for type II odontoid fractures
title_sort experience with goel-harms c1-c2 fixation for type ii odontoid fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35837432
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_22_22
work_keys_str_mv AT jainamitkumar anexperiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT tawarimanish anexperiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT rathorelavlesh anexperiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT sahanadebabrata anexperiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT mishraharshit anexperiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT kumarsanjeev anexperiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT sahurajivkumar anexperiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT jainamitkumar experiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT tawarimanish experiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT rathorelavlesh experiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT sahanadebabrata experiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT mishraharshit experiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT kumarsanjeev experiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures
AT sahurajivkumar experiencewithgoelharmsc1c2fixationfortypeiiodontoidfractures