Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Postoperative inflammation and endodontic failure occur due to apical extrusion of debris. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the amount of apically extruded debris during the root canal preparation using rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium instrumentation sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sowjanya, Thangi, Parvathaneni, Krishna Prasad, Raju, TBVG, Varma, N. Mahendra, Dondapati, Gowtham Dev, Podili, Srivalli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836559
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_631_20
_version_ 1784745340976496640
author Sowjanya, Thangi
Parvathaneni, Krishna Prasad
Raju, TBVG
Varma, N. Mahendra
Dondapati, Gowtham Dev
Podili, Srivalli
author_facet Sowjanya, Thangi
Parvathaneni, Krishna Prasad
Raju, TBVG
Varma, N. Mahendra
Dondapati, Gowtham Dev
Podili, Srivalli
author_sort Sowjanya, Thangi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Postoperative inflammation and endodontic failure occur due to apical extrusion of debris. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the amount of apically extruded debris during the root canal preparation using rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium instrumentation systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mesiobuccal canals of seventy five mature, human mandibular molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 25 teeth/group). Each group was instrumented using one of the three different instrumentation systems: Hyflex EDM (HEDM) rotary file, Flexicon X7 rotary, and Flexicon X1 reciprocating files. The canals were irrigated using distilled water. The debris extruded apically was collected in preweighed Eppendorf tubes and assessed with an electronic balance and compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and the intergroup comparison with single factor ANOVA. RESULTS: The Flexicon X1 reciprocating system showed the maximum amount of apical extrusion of debris among all the groups. The least amount of debris was observed in Flexicon X7 rotary instrument (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Flexicon X7 rotary extruded significantly lesser amount of debris than Flexicon X1 reciprocating and HEDM rotary file systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9274688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92746882022-07-13 Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study Sowjanya, Thangi Parvathaneni, Krishna Prasad Raju, TBVG Varma, N. Mahendra Dondapati, Gowtham Dev Podili, Srivalli J Conserv Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Postoperative inflammation and endodontic failure occur due to apical extrusion of debris. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the amount of apically extruded debris during the root canal preparation using rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium instrumentation systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mesiobuccal canals of seventy five mature, human mandibular molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 25 teeth/group). Each group was instrumented using one of the three different instrumentation systems: Hyflex EDM (HEDM) rotary file, Flexicon X7 rotary, and Flexicon X1 reciprocating files. The canals were irrigated using distilled water. The debris extruded apically was collected in preweighed Eppendorf tubes and assessed with an electronic balance and compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and the intergroup comparison with single factor ANOVA. RESULTS: The Flexicon X1 reciprocating system showed the maximum amount of apical extrusion of debris among all the groups. The least amount of debris was observed in Flexicon X7 rotary instrument (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Flexicon X7 rotary extruded significantly lesser amount of debris than Flexicon X1 reciprocating and HEDM rotary file systems. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9274688/ /pubmed/35836559 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_631_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sowjanya, Thangi
Parvathaneni, Krishna Prasad
Raju, TBVG
Varma, N. Mahendra
Dondapati, Gowtham Dev
Podili, Srivalli
Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836559
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_631_20
work_keys_str_mv AT sowjanyathangi comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy
AT parvathanenikrishnaprasad comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy
AT rajutbvg comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy
AT varmanmahendra comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy
AT dondapatigowthamdev comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy
AT podilisrivalli comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy