Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study
INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Postoperative inflammation and endodontic failure occur due to apical extrusion of debris. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the amount of apically extruded debris during the root canal preparation using rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium instrumentation sy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836559 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_631_20 |
_version_ | 1784745340976496640 |
---|---|
author | Sowjanya, Thangi Parvathaneni, Krishna Prasad Raju, TBVG Varma, N. Mahendra Dondapati, Gowtham Dev Podili, Srivalli |
author_facet | Sowjanya, Thangi Parvathaneni, Krishna Prasad Raju, TBVG Varma, N. Mahendra Dondapati, Gowtham Dev Podili, Srivalli |
author_sort | Sowjanya, Thangi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Postoperative inflammation and endodontic failure occur due to apical extrusion of debris. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the amount of apically extruded debris during the root canal preparation using rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium instrumentation systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mesiobuccal canals of seventy five mature, human mandibular molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 25 teeth/group). Each group was instrumented using one of the three different instrumentation systems: Hyflex EDM (HEDM) rotary file, Flexicon X7 rotary, and Flexicon X1 reciprocating files. The canals were irrigated using distilled water. The debris extruded apically was collected in preweighed Eppendorf tubes and assessed with an electronic balance and compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and the intergroup comparison with single factor ANOVA. RESULTS: The Flexicon X1 reciprocating system showed the maximum amount of apical extrusion of debris among all the groups. The least amount of debris was observed in Flexicon X7 rotary instrument (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Flexicon X7 rotary extruded significantly lesser amount of debris than Flexicon X1 reciprocating and HEDM rotary file systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9274688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92746882022-07-13 Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study Sowjanya, Thangi Parvathaneni, Krishna Prasad Raju, TBVG Varma, N. Mahendra Dondapati, Gowtham Dev Podili, Srivalli J Conserv Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Postoperative inflammation and endodontic failure occur due to apical extrusion of debris. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the amount of apically extruded debris during the root canal preparation using rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium instrumentation systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mesiobuccal canals of seventy five mature, human mandibular molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 25 teeth/group). Each group was instrumented using one of the three different instrumentation systems: Hyflex EDM (HEDM) rotary file, Flexicon X7 rotary, and Flexicon X1 reciprocating files. The canals were irrigated using distilled water. The debris extruded apically was collected in preweighed Eppendorf tubes and assessed with an electronic balance and compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and the intergroup comparison with single factor ANOVA. RESULTS: The Flexicon X1 reciprocating system showed the maximum amount of apical extrusion of debris among all the groups. The least amount of debris was observed in Flexicon X7 rotary instrument (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Flexicon X7 rotary extruded significantly lesser amount of debris than Flexicon X1 reciprocating and HEDM rotary file systems. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9274688/ /pubmed/35836559 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_631_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sowjanya, Thangi Parvathaneni, Krishna Prasad Raju, TBVG Varma, N. Mahendra Dondapati, Gowtham Dev Podili, Srivalli Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study |
title | Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836559 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_631_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sowjanyathangi comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy AT parvathanenikrishnaprasad comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy AT rajutbvg comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy AT varmanmahendra comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy AT dondapatigowthamdev comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy AT podilisrivalli comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisusingthreedifferentthermomechanicallyheattreatedfilesystemswithtwodifferentmotionsaninvitrostudy |