Cargando…

Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and nanohybrid composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples were prepared by filling the stainless steel mold of dimension 2 mm × 2 mm × 25 mm with cement/composite immedia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiremath, Geeta, Horati, Priya, Naik, Balaram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836560
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_627_21
_version_ 1784745343487836160
author Hiremath, Geeta
Horati, Priya
Naik, Balaram
author_facet Hiremath, Geeta
Horati, Priya
Naik, Balaram
author_sort Hiremath, Geeta
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and nanohybrid composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples were prepared by filling the stainless steel mold of dimension 2 mm × 2 mm × 25 mm with cement/composite immediately after mixing. Excess flash if any was removed by abrading it with abrasive paper. Then, the specimens were subjected to flexural strength measurement using universal testing machine. The results were then tabulated and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple post hoc test. RESULTS: The average flexural strength of NT Premium, Vitremer, and Cention N was 90.39 MPa, 46.59 MPa, and 62.88 MPa, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between NT Premium and Cention N and NT Premium and Vitremer with P = 0.0002 and 0.0001, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: The flexural strength study can help us to choose a material for restoring Class V lesions and can also confirm whether Cention N, a new material, be a definite replacement for amalgam. CONCLUSION: Cention N has proved to be a better material and can be a replacement for amagam and GIC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9274698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92746982022-07-13 Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study Hiremath, Geeta Horati, Priya Naik, Balaram J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and nanohybrid composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples were prepared by filling the stainless steel mold of dimension 2 mm × 2 mm × 25 mm with cement/composite immediately after mixing. Excess flash if any was removed by abrading it with abrasive paper. Then, the specimens were subjected to flexural strength measurement using universal testing machine. The results were then tabulated and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple post hoc test. RESULTS: The average flexural strength of NT Premium, Vitremer, and Cention N was 90.39 MPa, 46.59 MPa, and 62.88 MPa, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between NT Premium and Cention N and NT Premium and Vitremer with P = 0.0002 and 0.0001, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: The flexural strength study can help us to choose a material for restoring Class V lesions and can also confirm whether Cention N, a new material, be a definite replacement for amalgam. CONCLUSION: Cention N has proved to be a better material and can be a replacement for amagam and GIC. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9274698/ /pubmed/35836560 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_627_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hiremath, Geeta
Horati, Priya
Naik, Balaram
Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study
title Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study
title_full Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study
title_fullStr Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study
title_short Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study
title_sort evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of cention n with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836560
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_627_21
work_keys_str_mv AT hiremathgeeta evaluationandcomparisonofflexuralstrengthofcentionnwithresinmodifiedglassionomercementandcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT horatipriya evaluationandcomparisonofflexuralstrengthofcentionnwithresinmodifiedglassionomercementandcompositeaninvitrostudy
AT naikbalaram evaluationandcomparisonofflexuralstrengthofcentionnwithresinmodifiedglassionomercementandcompositeaninvitrostudy