Cargando…
Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and nanohybrid composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples were prepared by filling the stainless steel mold of dimension 2 mm × 2 mm × 25 mm with cement/composite immedia...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836560 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_627_21 |
_version_ | 1784745343487836160 |
---|---|
author | Hiremath, Geeta Horati, Priya Naik, Balaram |
author_facet | Hiremath, Geeta Horati, Priya Naik, Balaram |
author_sort | Hiremath, Geeta |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and nanohybrid composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples were prepared by filling the stainless steel mold of dimension 2 mm × 2 mm × 25 mm with cement/composite immediately after mixing. Excess flash if any was removed by abrading it with abrasive paper. Then, the specimens were subjected to flexural strength measurement using universal testing machine. The results were then tabulated and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple post hoc test. RESULTS: The average flexural strength of NT Premium, Vitremer, and Cention N was 90.39 MPa, 46.59 MPa, and 62.88 MPa, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between NT Premium and Cention N and NT Premium and Vitremer with P = 0.0002 and 0.0001, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: The flexural strength study can help us to choose a material for restoring Class V lesions and can also confirm whether Cention N, a new material, be a definite replacement for amalgam. CONCLUSION: Cention N has proved to be a better material and can be a replacement for amagam and GIC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9274698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92746982022-07-13 Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study Hiremath, Geeta Horati, Priya Naik, Balaram J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and nanohybrid composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples were prepared by filling the stainless steel mold of dimension 2 mm × 2 mm × 25 mm with cement/composite immediately after mixing. Excess flash if any was removed by abrading it with abrasive paper. Then, the specimens were subjected to flexural strength measurement using universal testing machine. The results were then tabulated and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple post hoc test. RESULTS: The average flexural strength of NT Premium, Vitremer, and Cention N was 90.39 MPa, 46.59 MPa, and 62.88 MPa, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between NT Premium and Cention N and NT Premium and Vitremer with P = 0.0002 and 0.0001, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: The flexural strength study can help us to choose a material for restoring Class V lesions and can also confirm whether Cention N, a new material, be a definite replacement for amalgam. CONCLUSION: Cention N has proved to be a better material and can be a replacement for amagam and GIC. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9274698/ /pubmed/35836560 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_627_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hiremath, Geeta Horati, Priya Naik, Balaram Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study |
title | Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study |
title_full | Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study |
title_short | Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – An in vitro study |
title_sort | evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of cention n with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite – an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836560 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_627_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hiremathgeeta evaluationandcomparisonofflexuralstrengthofcentionnwithresinmodifiedglassionomercementandcompositeaninvitrostudy AT horatipriya evaluationandcomparisonofflexuralstrengthofcentionnwithresinmodifiedglassionomercementandcompositeaninvitrostudy AT naikbalaram evaluationandcomparisonofflexuralstrengthofcentionnwithresinmodifiedglassionomercementandcompositeaninvitrostudy |