Cargando…

Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study

AIM: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation techniques EndoVac, RinsEndo, Canal CleanMax (CCMax), SonicMax, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), and Manual Needle Irrigation (MNI) on dentin erosion and smear layer removal using Scanning electron mic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akçay, Alper, Gorduysus, Melahat, Aydin, Berdan, Gorduysus, Mehmet Omer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836563
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_127_21
_version_ 1784745344224985088
author Akçay, Alper
Gorduysus, Melahat
Aydin, Berdan
Gorduysus, Mehmet Omer
author_facet Akçay, Alper
Gorduysus, Melahat
Aydin, Berdan
Gorduysus, Mehmet Omer
author_sort Akçay, Alper
collection PubMed
description AIM: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation techniques EndoVac, RinsEndo, Canal CleanMax (CCMax), SonicMax, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), and Manual Needle Irrigation (MNI) on dentin erosion and smear layer removal using Scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy extracted single-rooted teeth were instrumented with ProTaper rotary instruments. The roots were randomly divided into six experimental groups (n = 10): EndoVac, RinsEndo, CCMax, SonicMax, PUI, and MNI. Final irrigation was performed with NaOCl followed by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and NaOCl. Six roots served as control and were irrigated with only NaOCl. Next, the roots were sectioned in a buccolingual direction and the halves were examined by SEM. Smear layer and erosion scores were recorded in the cervical, middle and apical third of the roots. Data analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests with a level of significance α = 0.05. RESULTS: PUI had the greatest amount of smear layer compared to other groups (P < 0.001). However, SonicMax had the greatest degree of erosion compared to RinsEndo, MNI, PUI, and EndoVac groups (P < 0.001) and CCMax group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RinsEndo and EndoVac techniques left the least amount of smear layer while causing erosion the least compared to CCMax, PUI, and MNI techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9274701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92747012022-07-13 Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study Akçay, Alper Gorduysus, Melahat Aydin, Berdan Gorduysus, Mehmet Omer J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation techniques EndoVac, RinsEndo, Canal CleanMax (CCMax), SonicMax, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), and Manual Needle Irrigation (MNI) on dentin erosion and smear layer removal using Scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy extracted single-rooted teeth were instrumented with ProTaper rotary instruments. The roots were randomly divided into six experimental groups (n = 10): EndoVac, RinsEndo, CCMax, SonicMax, PUI, and MNI. Final irrigation was performed with NaOCl followed by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and NaOCl. Six roots served as control and were irrigated with only NaOCl. Next, the roots were sectioned in a buccolingual direction and the halves were examined by SEM. Smear layer and erosion scores were recorded in the cervical, middle and apical third of the roots. Data analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests with a level of significance α = 0.05. RESULTS: PUI had the greatest amount of smear layer compared to other groups (P < 0.001). However, SonicMax had the greatest degree of erosion compared to RinsEndo, MNI, PUI, and EndoVac groups (P < 0.001) and CCMax group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RinsEndo and EndoVac techniques left the least amount of smear layer while causing erosion the least compared to CCMax, PUI, and MNI techniques. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9274701/ /pubmed/35836563 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_127_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Akçay, Alper
Gorduysus, Melahat
Aydin, Berdan
Gorduysus, Mehmet Omer
Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study
title Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study
title_full Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study
title_fullStr Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study
title_short Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study
title_sort evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: a scanning electron microscopy study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836563
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_127_21
work_keys_str_mv AT akcayalper evaluationofdifferentirrigationtechniquesondentinerosionandsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopystudy
AT gorduysusmelahat evaluationofdifferentirrigationtechniquesondentinerosionandsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopystudy
AT aydinberdan evaluationofdifferentirrigationtechniquesondentinerosionandsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopystudy
AT gorduysusmehmetomer evaluationofdifferentirrigationtechniquesondentinerosionandsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopystudy