Cargando…
Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study
AIM: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation techniques EndoVac, RinsEndo, Canal CleanMax (CCMax), SonicMax, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), and Manual Needle Irrigation (MNI) on dentin erosion and smear layer removal using Scanning electron mic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836563 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_127_21 |
_version_ | 1784745344224985088 |
---|---|
author | Akçay, Alper Gorduysus, Melahat Aydin, Berdan Gorduysus, Mehmet Omer |
author_facet | Akçay, Alper Gorduysus, Melahat Aydin, Berdan Gorduysus, Mehmet Omer |
author_sort | Akçay, Alper |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation techniques EndoVac, RinsEndo, Canal CleanMax (CCMax), SonicMax, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), and Manual Needle Irrigation (MNI) on dentin erosion and smear layer removal using Scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy extracted single-rooted teeth were instrumented with ProTaper rotary instruments. The roots were randomly divided into six experimental groups (n = 10): EndoVac, RinsEndo, CCMax, SonicMax, PUI, and MNI. Final irrigation was performed with NaOCl followed by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and NaOCl. Six roots served as control and were irrigated with only NaOCl. Next, the roots were sectioned in a buccolingual direction and the halves were examined by SEM. Smear layer and erosion scores were recorded in the cervical, middle and apical third of the roots. Data analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests with a level of significance α = 0.05. RESULTS: PUI had the greatest amount of smear layer compared to other groups (P < 0.001). However, SonicMax had the greatest degree of erosion compared to RinsEndo, MNI, PUI, and EndoVac groups (P < 0.001) and CCMax group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RinsEndo and EndoVac techniques left the least amount of smear layer while causing erosion the least compared to CCMax, PUI, and MNI techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9274701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92747012022-07-13 Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study Akçay, Alper Gorduysus, Melahat Aydin, Berdan Gorduysus, Mehmet Omer J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation techniques EndoVac, RinsEndo, Canal CleanMax (CCMax), SonicMax, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), and Manual Needle Irrigation (MNI) on dentin erosion and smear layer removal using Scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy extracted single-rooted teeth were instrumented with ProTaper rotary instruments. The roots were randomly divided into six experimental groups (n = 10): EndoVac, RinsEndo, CCMax, SonicMax, PUI, and MNI. Final irrigation was performed with NaOCl followed by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and NaOCl. Six roots served as control and were irrigated with only NaOCl. Next, the roots were sectioned in a buccolingual direction and the halves were examined by SEM. Smear layer and erosion scores were recorded in the cervical, middle and apical third of the roots. Data analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests with a level of significance α = 0.05. RESULTS: PUI had the greatest amount of smear layer compared to other groups (P < 0.001). However, SonicMax had the greatest degree of erosion compared to RinsEndo, MNI, PUI, and EndoVac groups (P < 0.001) and CCMax group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RinsEndo and EndoVac techniques left the least amount of smear layer while causing erosion the least compared to CCMax, PUI, and MNI techniques. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9274701/ /pubmed/35836563 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_127_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Akçay, Alper Gorduysus, Melahat Aydin, Berdan Gorduysus, Mehmet Omer Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study |
title | Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study |
title_full | Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study |
title_short | Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study |
title_sort | evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: a scanning electron microscopy study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836563 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_127_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akcayalper evaluationofdifferentirrigationtechniquesondentinerosionandsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopystudy AT gorduysusmelahat evaluationofdifferentirrigationtechniquesondentinerosionandsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopystudy AT aydinberdan evaluationofdifferentirrigationtechniquesondentinerosionandsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopystudy AT gorduysusmehmetomer evaluationofdifferentirrigationtechniquesondentinerosionandsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopystudy |