Cargando…

Assessing proprioceptive acuity in people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: Proprioceptive acuity and impairments in proprioceptively guided reaches have not been comprehensively examined in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To examine proprioceptive acuity in people with MS who self-report and who do not self-report upper limb (UL) impairment, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldlist, Serena, Wijeyaratnam, Darrin O, Edwards, Thomas, Pilutti, Lara A, Cressman, Erin K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35837242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552173221111761
_version_ 1784745368158732288
author Goldlist, Serena
Wijeyaratnam, Darrin O
Edwards, Thomas
Pilutti, Lara A
Cressman, Erin K
author_facet Goldlist, Serena
Wijeyaratnam, Darrin O
Edwards, Thomas
Pilutti, Lara A
Cressman, Erin K
author_sort Goldlist, Serena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proprioceptive acuity and impairments in proprioceptively guided reaches have not been comprehensively examined in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To examine proprioceptive acuity in people with MS who self-report and who do not self-report upper limb (UL) impairment, and to determine how people with MS reach proprioceptive targets. METHODS: Twenty-four participants with MS were recruited into two groups based on self-reported UL impairment: MS-R (i.e. report UL impairment; n  =  12) vs. MS-NR (i.e. do not report UL impairment; n  =  12). Proprioception was assessed using ipsilateral and contralateral robotic proprioceptive matching tasks. RESULTS: Participants in the MS-R group demonstrated worse proprioceptive acuity compared to the MS-NR group on the ipsilateral and contralateral robotic matching tasks. Analyses of reaches to proprioceptive targets further revealed that participants in the MS-R group exhibited deficits in movement planning, as demonstrated by greater errors at peak velocity in the contralateral matching task in comparison to the MS-NR group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that people with MS who self-report UL impairment demonstrate worse proprioceptive acuity, as well as poorer movement planning in comparison to people with MS who do not report UL impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9274812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92748122022-07-13 Assessing proprioceptive acuity in people with multiple sclerosis Goldlist, Serena Wijeyaratnam, Darrin O Edwards, Thomas Pilutti, Lara A Cressman, Erin K Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Proprioceptive acuity and impairments in proprioceptively guided reaches have not been comprehensively examined in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To examine proprioceptive acuity in people with MS who self-report and who do not self-report upper limb (UL) impairment, and to determine how people with MS reach proprioceptive targets. METHODS: Twenty-four participants with MS were recruited into two groups based on self-reported UL impairment: MS-R (i.e. report UL impairment; n  =  12) vs. MS-NR (i.e. do not report UL impairment; n  =  12). Proprioception was assessed using ipsilateral and contralateral robotic proprioceptive matching tasks. RESULTS: Participants in the MS-R group demonstrated worse proprioceptive acuity compared to the MS-NR group on the ipsilateral and contralateral robotic matching tasks. Analyses of reaches to proprioceptive targets further revealed that participants in the MS-R group exhibited deficits in movement planning, as demonstrated by greater errors at peak velocity in the contralateral matching task in comparison to the MS-NR group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that people with MS who self-report UL impairment demonstrate worse proprioceptive acuity, as well as poorer movement planning in comparison to people with MS who do not report UL impairment. SAGE Publications 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9274812/ /pubmed/35837242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552173221111761 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Goldlist, Serena
Wijeyaratnam, Darrin O
Edwards, Thomas
Pilutti, Lara A
Cressman, Erin K
Assessing proprioceptive acuity in people with multiple sclerosis
title Assessing proprioceptive acuity in people with multiple sclerosis
title_full Assessing proprioceptive acuity in people with multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Assessing proprioceptive acuity in people with multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Assessing proprioceptive acuity in people with multiple sclerosis
title_short Assessing proprioceptive acuity in people with multiple sclerosis
title_sort assessing proprioceptive acuity in people with multiple sclerosis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35837242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552173221111761
work_keys_str_mv AT goldlistserena assessingproprioceptiveacuityinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT wijeyaratnamdarrino assessingproprioceptiveacuityinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT edwardsthomas assessingproprioceptiveacuityinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT piluttilaraa assessingproprioceptiveacuityinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT cressmanerink assessingproprioceptiveacuityinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis