Cargando…
Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential
INTRODUCTION: Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) contain recommendations that aim to guide physicians in the diagnosis of and therapeutic approach toward patients affected by gastrointestinal (GI) pathologies. These CPG systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35979247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000518322 |
_version_ | 1784745368909512704 |
---|---|
author | Correia, Catarina Almeida, Nuno Figueiredo, Pedro Narra |
author_facet | Correia, Catarina Almeida, Nuno Figueiredo, Pedro Narra |
author_sort | Correia, Catarina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) contain recommendations that aim to guide physicians in the diagnosis of and therapeutic approach toward patients affected by gastrointestinal (GI) pathologies. These CPG systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in recommendations that have been shown to improve patient care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: European and North American guidelines published in the area of gastroenterology in 2018 and 2019 were considered for inclusion. To standardize the results, only guidelines that used GRADE as an evidence system were included. Thus, in the end, 1,233 recommendations from 29 guidelines published between 2018 and 2019 were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 1,233 recommendations collected, 324 (26.3%) had a low level of evidence and 127 (10.3%) had a very low level of evidence, indicating little evidence or expert opinion. Of the 29 publications analyzed, 14 (48.3%) did not present any recommendation with a high level of evidence. Regarding the 1,233 individual recommendations expressed in these 29 publications, only 336 (27.25%) assumed a high level of evidence, with 277 (82.44%) referring to liver pathology. Of the recommendations evaluated, 77 were from North American societies and the remaining 1,156 were European recommendations. In relation to the first group, only 3 (3.9%) had a high level of evidence belonging to the Guidelines for Sedation and Anesthesia in GI Endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: More than 25% of all recommendations currently accepted to guide patients with gastroenterological disorders are based on low-quality evidence or expert opinion. Thus, these documents should guide our performance, but clinical sense and multidisciplinarity must not be overlooked in dubious cases and with weak scientific evidence. Research should focus on the development of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews to improve the evidence supporting the guidelines that guide clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9274816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | S. Karger AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92748162022-08-16 Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential Correia, Catarina Almeida, Nuno Figueiredo, Pedro Narra GE Port J Gastroenterol Research Article INTRODUCTION: Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) contain recommendations that aim to guide physicians in the diagnosis of and therapeutic approach toward patients affected by gastrointestinal (GI) pathologies. These CPG systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in recommendations that have been shown to improve patient care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: European and North American guidelines published in the area of gastroenterology in 2018 and 2019 were considered for inclusion. To standardize the results, only guidelines that used GRADE as an evidence system were included. Thus, in the end, 1,233 recommendations from 29 guidelines published between 2018 and 2019 were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 1,233 recommendations collected, 324 (26.3%) had a low level of evidence and 127 (10.3%) had a very low level of evidence, indicating little evidence or expert opinion. Of the 29 publications analyzed, 14 (48.3%) did not present any recommendation with a high level of evidence. Regarding the 1,233 individual recommendations expressed in these 29 publications, only 336 (27.25%) assumed a high level of evidence, with 277 (82.44%) referring to liver pathology. Of the recommendations evaluated, 77 were from North American societies and the remaining 1,156 were European recommendations. In relation to the first group, only 3 (3.9%) had a high level of evidence belonging to the Guidelines for Sedation and Anesthesia in GI Endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: More than 25% of all recommendations currently accepted to guide patients with gastroenterological disorders are based on low-quality evidence or expert opinion. Thus, these documents should guide our performance, but clinical sense and multidisciplinarity must not be overlooked in dubious cases and with weak scientific evidence. Research should focus on the development of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews to improve the evidence supporting the guidelines that guide clinical practice. S. Karger AG 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9274816/ /pubmed/35979247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000518322 Text en Copyright © 2021 by Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Correia, Catarina Almeida, Nuno Figueiredo, Pedro Narra Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential |
title | Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential |
title_full | Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential |
title_fullStr | Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential |
title_full_unstemmed | Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential |
title_short | Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential |
title_sort | guidelines in gastroenterology: careful interpretation is essential |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35979247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000518322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT correiacatarina guidelinesingastroenterologycarefulinterpretationisessential AT almeidanuno guidelinesingastroenterologycarefulinterpretationisessential AT figueiredopedronarra guidelinesingastroenterologycarefulinterpretationisessential |