Cargando…
Supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis
BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing surgical with nonsurgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) reported that surgery is superior to nonsurgical treatments, but intensive and adequate volume of physical therapy were rarely performed. The purpose of this study was to compare the 1-year fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05632-y |
_version_ | 1784745433464045568 |
---|---|
author | Minetama, Masakazu Kawakami, Mamoru Teraguchi, Masatoshi Enyo, Yoshio Nakagawa, Masafumi Yamamoto, Yoshio Matsuo, Sachika Nakatani, Tomohiro Sakon, Nana Nakagawa, Yukihiro |
author_facet | Minetama, Masakazu Kawakami, Mamoru Teraguchi, Masatoshi Enyo, Yoshio Nakagawa, Masafumi Yamamoto, Yoshio Matsuo, Sachika Nakatani, Tomohiro Sakon, Nana Nakagawa, Yukihiro |
author_sort | Minetama, Masakazu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing surgical with nonsurgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) reported that surgery is superior to nonsurgical treatments, but intensive and adequate volume of physical therapy were rarely performed. The purpose of this study was to compare the 1-year follow-up outcomes of patients with LSS treated with supervised physical therapy or surgery using propensity score-matched analysis. METHODS: A total of 224 patients with LSS who received supervised physical therapy (n = 38) or surgery (n = 186) were included, of which 66 were matched on baseline demographics, radiological findings, and patient-reported outcomes. The physical therapy group received supervised physical therapy twice weekly for 6 weeks. The physical therapy sessions included manual therapy, individually tailored exercises, cycling, and body-weight supported treadmill walking. The surgery group underwent decompression surgery with or without spinal fusion. A propensity score analysis was performed using a one-to-one nearest neighbor approach. RESULTS: The surgery group showed greater improvements in Zurich claudication questionnaire symptom severity and physical function, SF-36 physical functioning, bodily pain, and mental health, but had more severe stenosis and symptoms and mental health problems than the physical therapy group at baseline (P < 0.05). After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, and all clinical outcomes at 1 year, except for a higher percentage of responders achieving minimum clinically important difference in the role-emotional subscale of SF-36 in the surgery group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When baseline characteristics were considered, supervised physical therapy yielded similar effects to lumbar surgery. These results suggest that supervised physical therapy is preferred over surgery as first-choice treatment, to prevent complications and to minimize health care costs, especially in mild to moderate cases of LSS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9275154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92751542022-07-13 Supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis Minetama, Masakazu Kawakami, Mamoru Teraguchi, Masatoshi Enyo, Yoshio Nakagawa, Masafumi Yamamoto, Yoshio Matsuo, Sachika Nakatani, Tomohiro Sakon, Nana Nakagawa, Yukihiro BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing surgical with nonsurgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) reported that surgery is superior to nonsurgical treatments, but intensive and adequate volume of physical therapy were rarely performed. The purpose of this study was to compare the 1-year follow-up outcomes of patients with LSS treated with supervised physical therapy or surgery using propensity score-matched analysis. METHODS: A total of 224 patients with LSS who received supervised physical therapy (n = 38) or surgery (n = 186) were included, of which 66 were matched on baseline demographics, radiological findings, and patient-reported outcomes. The physical therapy group received supervised physical therapy twice weekly for 6 weeks. The physical therapy sessions included manual therapy, individually tailored exercises, cycling, and body-weight supported treadmill walking. The surgery group underwent decompression surgery with or without spinal fusion. A propensity score analysis was performed using a one-to-one nearest neighbor approach. RESULTS: The surgery group showed greater improvements in Zurich claudication questionnaire symptom severity and physical function, SF-36 physical functioning, bodily pain, and mental health, but had more severe stenosis and symptoms and mental health problems than the physical therapy group at baseline (P < 0.05). After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, and all clinical outcomes at 1 year, except for a higher percentage of responders achieving minimum clinically important difference in the role-emotional subscale of SF-36 in the surgery group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When baseline characteristics were considered, supervised physical therapy yielded similar effects to lumbar surgery. These results suggest that supervised physical therapy is preferred over surgery as first-choice treatment, to prevent complications and to minimize health care costs, especially in mild to moderate cases of LSS. BioMed Central 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9275154/ /pubmed/35820887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05632-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Minetama, Masakazu Kawakami, Mamoru Teraguchi, Masatoshi Enyo, Yoshio Nakagawa, Masafumi Yamamoto, Yoshio Matsuo, Sachika Nakatani, Tomohiro Sakon, Nana Nakagawa, Yukihiro Supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title | Supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full | Supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_fullStr | Supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_short | Supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_sort | supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05632-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minetamamasakazu supervisedphysicaltherapyversussurgeryforpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT kawakamimamoru supervisedphysicaltherapyversussurgeryforpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT teraguchimasatoshi supervisedphysicaltherapyversussurgeryforpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT enyoyoshio supervisedphysicaltherapyversussurgeryforpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT nakagawamasafumi supervisedphysicaltherapyversussurgeryforpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT yamamotoyoshio supervisedphysicaltherapyversussurgeryforpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT matsuosachika supervisedphysicaltherapyversussurgeryforpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT nakatanitomohiro supervisedphysicaltherapyversussurgeryforpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT sakonnana supervisedphysicaltherapyversussurgeryforpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT nakagawayukihiro supervisedphysicaltherapyversussurgeryforpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisapropensityscorematchedanalysis |