Cargando…

Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy

This document provides methodological guidance developed by the EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare to produce Scientific Opinions in response to mandates received from the European Commission in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy. The mandates relate to the welfare of (i) animals during t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Alvarez, Julio, Bicout, Dominique Joseph, Calistri, Paolo, Canali, Elisabetta, Drewe, Julian Ashley, Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno, Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis, Gortázar Schmidt, Christian, Herskin, Mette, Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel, Michel, Virginie, Padalino, Barbara, Pasquali, Paolo, Roberts, Helen Clare, Spoolder, Hans, Stahl, Karl, Velarde, Antonio, Viltrop, Arvo, Edwards, Sandra, Ashe, Sean, Candiani, Denise, Fabris, Chiara, Lima, Eliana, Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf, Gimeno, Cristina Rojo, Van der Stede, Yves, Vitali, Marika, Winckler, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846109
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7403
_version_ 1784745437979213824
author Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Michel, Virginie
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Edwards, Sandra
Ashe, Sean
Candiani, Denise
Fabris, Chiara
Lima, Eliana
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Gimeno, Cristina Rojo
Van der Stede, Yves
Vitali, Marika
Winckler, Christoph
author_facet Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Michel, Virginie
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Edwards, Sandra
Ashe, Sean
Candiani, Denise
Fabris, Chiara
Lima, Eliana
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Gimeno, Cristina Rojo
Van der Stede, Yves
Vitali, Marika
Winckler, Christoph
collection PubMed
description This document provides methodological guidance developed by the EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare to produce Scientific Opinions in response to mandates received from the European Commission in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy. The mandates relate to the welfare of (i) animals during transport, (ii) calves, (iii) laying hens, (iv) broilers, (v) pigs, (vi) ducks, geese and quails, and (vii) dairy cows. This guidance was developed in order to define the methods and strategy to be applied for responding to the Terms of Reference (ToRs) of the mandates. The mandates each consist of a set of General ToRs which refer to the husbandry systems used in the production of each animal species or the current transport practices for free moving animals and animals transported in cages, and a set of specific ToRs for which difficulties in ensuring animal welfare have been identified and where specific scenarios are envisaged. Part I of the guidance includes a description of welfare consequences for the animals. Part II includes a new methodology for providing quantitative recommendations regarding animal welfare. The proposed methodology follows the assumption that the effect of an exposure variable (e.g. space allowance) on animal welfare can be quantified by comparing the expression of an animal‐based measure (ABM) under ‘unexposed conditions’ (e.g. unlimited space) and under high exposure (e.g. restrictive conditions). The level of welfare as assessed through this ABM can be quantified for different levels of the exposure variable (e.g. at increasing space allowances) and quantitative recommendations can thus be provided. The final version of the methodological guidance was endorsed for public consultation, which took place between 14 February 2022 and 31 March 2022. The comments received are integrated in this document.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9275173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92751732022-07-15 Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Michel, Virginie Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Edwards, Sandra Ashe, Sean Candiani, Denise Fabris, Chiara Lima, Eliana Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Gimeno, Cristina Rojo Van der Stede, Yves Vitali, Marika Winckler, Christoph EFSA J Scientific Opinion This document provides methodological guidance developed by the EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare to produce Scientific Opinions in response to mandates received from the European Commission in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy. The mandates relate to the welfare of (i) animals during transport, (ii) calves, (iii) laying hens, (iv) broilers, (v) pigs, (vi) ducks, geese and quails, and (vii) dairy cows. This guidance was developed in order to define the methods and strategy to be applied for responding to the Terms of Reference (ToRs) of the mandates. The mandates each consist of a set of General ToRs which refer to the husbandry systems used in the production of each animal species or the current transport practices for free moving animals and animals transported in cages, and a set of specific ToRs for which difficulties in ensuring animal welfare have been identified and where specific scenarios are envisaged. Part I of the guidance includes a description of welfare consequences for the animals. Part II includes a new methodology for providing quantitative recommendations regarding animal welfare. The proposed methodology follows the assumption that the effect of an exposure variable (e.g. space allowance) on animal welfare can be quantified by comparing the expression of an animal‐based measure (ABM) under ‘unexposed conditions’ (e.g. unlimited space) and under high exposure (e.g. restrictive conditions). The level of welfare as assessed through this ABM can be quantified for different levels of the exposure variable (e.g. at increasing space allowances) and quantitative recommendations can thus be provided. The final version of the methodological guidance was endorsed for public consultation, which took place between 14 February 2022 and 31 March 2022. The comments received are integrated in this document. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9275173/ /pubmed/35846109 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7403 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Michel, Virginie
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Edwards, Sandra
Ashe, Sean
Candiani, Denise
Fabris, Chiara
Lima, Eliana
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Gimeno, Cristina Rojo
Van der Stede, Yves
Vitali, Marika
Winckler, Christoph
Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy
title Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy
title_full Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy
title_fullStr Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy
title_short Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy
title_sort methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the farm to fork strategy
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846109
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7403
work_keys_str_mv AT methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT nielsensørensaxmose methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT alvarezjulio methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT bicoutdominiquejoseph methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT calistripaolo methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT canalielisabetta methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT drewejulianashley methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT garinbastujibruno methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT gortazarschmidtchristian methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT herskinmette methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT mirandachuecamiguelangel methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT michelvirginie methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT padalinobarbara methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT pasqualipaolo methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT robertshelenclare methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT spoolderhans methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT stahlkarl methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT velardeantonio methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT viltroparvo methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT edwardssandra methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT ashesean methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT candianidenise methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT fabrischiara methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT limaeliana methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT mosbachschulzolaf methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT gimenocristinarojo methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT vanderstedeyves methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT vitalimarika methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy
AT wincklerchristoph methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy