Cargando…
Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy
This document provides methodological guidance developed by the EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare to produce Scientific Opinions in response to mandates received from the European Commission in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy. The mandates relate to the welfare of (i) animals during t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846109 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7403 |
_version_ | 1784745437979213824 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Michel, Virginie Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Edwards, Sandra Ashe, Sean Candiani, Denise Fabris, Chiara Lima, Eliana Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Gimeno, Cristina Rojo Van der Stede, Yves Vitali, Marika Winckler, Christoph |
author_facet | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Michel, Virginie Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Edwards, Sandra Ashe, Sean Candiani, Denise Fabris, Chiara Lima, Eliana Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Gimeno, Cristina Rojo Van der Stede, Yves Vitali, Marika Winckler, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | This document provides methodological guidance developed by the EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare to produce Scientific Opinions in response to mandates received from the European Commission in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy. The mandates relate to the welfare of (i) animals during transport, (ii) calves, (iii) laying hens, (iv) broilers, (v) pigs, (vi) ducks, geese and quails, and (vii) dairy cows. This guidance was developed in order to define the methods and strategy to be applied for responding to the Terms of Reference (ToRs) of the mandates. The mandates each consist of a set of General ToRs which refer to the husbandry systems used in the production of each animal species or the current transport practices for free moving animals and animals transported in cages, and a set of specific ToRs for which difficulties in ensuring animal welfare have been identified and where specific scenarios are envisaged. Part I of the guidance includes a description of welfare consequences for the animals. Part II includes a new methodology for providing quantitative recommendations regarding animal welfare. The proposed methodology follows the assumption that the effect of an exposure variable (e.g. space allowance) on animal welfare can be quantified by comparing the expression of an animal‐based measure (ABM) under ‘unexposed conditions’ (e.g. unlimited space) and under high exposure (e.g. restrictive conditions). The level of welfare as assessed through this ABM can be quantified for different levels of the exposure variable (e.g. at increasing space allowances) and quantitative recommendations can thus be provided. The final version of the methodological guidance was endorsed for public consultation, which took place between 14 February 2022 and 31 March 2022. The comments received are integrated in this document. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9275173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92751732022-07-15 Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Michel, Virginie Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Edwards, Sandra Ashe, Sean Candiani, Denise Fabris, Chiara Lima, Eliana Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Gimeno, Cristina Rojo Van der Stede, Yves Vitali, Marika Winckler, Christoph EFSA J Scientific Opinion This document provides methodological guidance developed by the EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare to produce Scientific Opinions in response to mandates received from the European Commission in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy. The mandates relate to the welfare of (i) animals during transport, (ii) calves, (iii) laying hens, (iv) broilers, (v) pigs, (vi) ducks, geese and quails, and (vii) dairy cows. This guidance was developed in order to define the methods and strategy to be applied for responding to the Terms of Reference (ToRs) of the mandates. The mandates each consist of a set of General ToRs which refer to the husbandry systems used in the production of each animal species or the current transport practices for free moving animals and animals transported in cages, and a set of specific ToRs for which difficulties in ensuring animal welfare have been identified and where specific scenarios are envisaged. Part I of the guidance includes a description of welfare consequences for the animals. Part II includes a new methodology for providing quantitative recommendations regarding animal welfare. The proposed methodology follows the assumption that the effect of an exposure variable (e.g. space allowance) on animal welfare can be quantified by comparing the expression of an animal‐based measure (ABM) under ‘unexposed conditions’ (e.g. unlimited space) and under high exposure (e.g. restrictive conditions). The level of welfare as assessed through this ABM can be quantified for different levels of the exposure variable (e.g. at increasing space allowances) and quantitative recommendations can thus be provided. The final version of the methodological guidance was endorsed for public consultation, which took place between 14 February 2022 and 31 March 2022. The comments received are integrated in this document. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9275173/ /pubmed/35846109 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7403 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Michel, Virginie Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Edwards, Sandra Ashe, Sean Candiani, Denise Fabris, Chiara Lima, Eliana Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Gimeno, Cristina Rojo Van der Stede, Yves Vitali, Marika Winckler, Christoph Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy |
title | Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy |
title_full | Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy |
title_fullStr | Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy |
title_full_unstemmed | Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy |
title_short | Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy |
title_sort | methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the farm to fork strategy |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846109 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT nielsensørensaxmose methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT alvarezjulio methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT bicoutdominiquejoseph methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT calistripaolo methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT canalielisabetta methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT drewejulianashley methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT garinbastujibruno methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT gortazarschmidtchristian methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT herskinmette methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT mirandachuecamiguelangel methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT michelvirginie methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT padalinobarbara methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT pasqualipaolo methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT robertshelenclare methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT spoolderhans methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT stahlkarl methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT velardeantonio methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT viltroparvo methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT edwardssandra methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT ashesean methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT candianidenise methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT fabrischiara methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT limaeliana methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT mosbachschulzolaf methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT gimenocristinarojo methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT vanderstedeyves methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT vitalimarika methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy AT wincklerchristoph methodologicalguidanceforthedevelopmentofanimalwelfaremandatesinthecontextofthefarmtoforkstrategy |