Cargando…
The efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study
BACKGROUND: There is still a lack of consensus on which internal fixation method can better maintain the stability of femoral neck fractures (FNF), promote fracture healing, and reduce postoperative complications such as femoral head necrosis and nonunion. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05631-z |
_version_ | 1784745457031839744 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Jian-Zhong Xiao, Ya-Ping Li, Ling Bei, Ming-Jian |
author_facet | Chang, Jian-Zhong Xiao, Ya-Ping Li, Ling Bei, Ming-Jian |
author_sort | Chang, Jian-Zhong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is still a lack of consensus on which internal fixation method can better maintain the stability of femoral neck fractures (FNF), promote fracture healing, and reduce postoperative complications such as femoral head necrosis and nonunion. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the novel dynamic compression locking system (DCLS) versus dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of FNF. METHODS: Fifty cases of FNF from July 2018 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into DCLS group (26 cases) and DHS group (24 cases). Baseline data, intraoperative and postoperative clinical data, reoperation rate, and Harris score were collected to evaluate the clinical efficacy. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 24 months. All “fractures” were caused by fall. The baseline data of the two groups were comparable (P > 0.05). There weren’t significant differences in the length of hospital stay and mobility after two years postoperatively between the two groups (P > 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, incision length, fluoroscopy times and the degree of femoral neck shortening after two years postoperatively in the DCLS group were significantly less than those in the DHS group (all P < 0.05). Harris score after two years postoperatively in the DCLS group was significantly higher than that in the DHS group (P < 0.05). Although the reoperation rate in the DHS group was slightly higher than that in the DCLS group, it wasn’t statistical significance (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with DHS, DCLS in the treatment of FNF had less surgical trauma, shorter incision length, shorter operation time, lower radiation dose and higher Harris scores. Although the reoperation rate in the DHS group was slightly higher than that in the DCLS group, it wasn’t statistical difference. Further research is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9275283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92752832022-07-13 The efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study Chang, Jian-Zhong Xiao, Ya-Ping Li, Ling Bei, Ming-Jian BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: There is still a lack of consensus on which internal fixation method can better maintain the stability of femoral neck fractures (FNF), promote fracture healing, and reduce postoperative complications such as femoral head necrosis and nonunion. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the novel dynamic compression locking system (DCLS) versus dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of FNF. METHODS: Fifty cases of FNF from July 2018 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into DCLS group (26 cases) and DHS group (24 cases). Baseline data, intraoperative and postoperative clinical data, reoperation rate, and Harris score were collected to evaluate the clinical efficacy. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 24 months. All “fractures” were caused by fall. The baseline data of the two groups were comparable (P > 0.05). There weren’t significant differences in the length of hospital stay and mobility after two years postoperatively between the two groups (P > 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, incision length, fluoroscopy times and the degree of femoral neck shortening after two years postoperatively in the DCLS group were significantly less than those in the DHS group (all P < 0.05). Harris score after two years postoperatively in the DCLS group was significantly higher than that in the DHS group (P < 0.05). Although the reoperation rate in the DHS group was slightly higher than that in the DCLS group, it wasn’t statistical significance (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with DHS, DCLS in the treatment of FNF had less surgical trauma, shorter incision length, shorter operation time, lower radiation dose and higher Harris scores. Although the reoperation rate in the DHS group was slightly higher than that in the DCLS group, it wasn’t statistical difference. Further research is needed. BioMed Central 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9275283/ /pubmed/35820870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05631-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chang, Jian-Zhong Xiao, Ya-Ping Li, Ling Bei, Ming-Jian The efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study |
title | The efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study |
title_full | The efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study |
title_short | The efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study |
title_sort | efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05631-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changjianzhong theefficacyofdynamiccompressionlockingsystemvsdynamichipscrewinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesacomparativestudy AT xiaoyaping theefficacyofdynamiccompressionlockingsystemvsdynamichipscrewinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesacomparativestudy AT liling theefficacyofdynamiccompressionlockingsystemvsdynamichipscrewinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesacomparativestudy AT beimingjian theefficacyofdynamiccompressionlockingsystemvsdynamichipscrewinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesacomparativestudy AT changjianzhong efficacyofdynamiccompressionlockingsystemvsdynamichipscrewinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesacomparativestudy AT xiaoyaping efficacyofdynamiccompressionlockingsystemvsdynamichipscrewinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesacomparativestudy AT liling efficacyofdynamiccompressionlockingsystemvsdynamichipscrewinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesacomparativestudy AT beimingjian efficacyofdynamiccompressionlockingsystemvsdynamichipscrewinthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesacomparativestudy |