Cargando…
Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences
Sex/gender diversity is increasingly recognised by society and should be taken into account more in population-representative studies, as they are important data sources for targeting health promotion, prevention and care. In 2019, the Robert Koch Institute started a population-representative health...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Robert Koch Institute
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891940 http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/9958 |
_version_ | 1784745502265311232 |
---|---|
author | Pöge, Kathleen Rommel, Alexander Starker, Anne Prütz, Franziska Tolksdorf, Katharina Öztürk, Ilter Strasser, Sarah Born, Sabine Saß, Anke-Christine |
author_facet | Pöge, Kathleen Rommel, Alexander Starker, Anne Prütz, Franziska Tolksdorf, Katharina Öztürk, Ilter Strasser, Sarah Born, Sabine Saß, Anke-Christine |
author_sort | Pöge, Kathleen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sex/gender diversity is increasingly recognised by society and should be taken into account more in population-representative studies, as they are important data sources for targeting health promotion, prevention and care. In 2019, the Robert Koch Institute started a population-representative health survey with the study Health in Germany Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) with a modified, two-stage measures of sex/gender. The survey covered sex registered at birth and gender identity with an open response option. This article describes the aims, the procedure and the experiences with the operationalisation of sex/gender and the results. Out of 23,001 respondents, 22,826 persons are classified as cisgender, 113 persons as transgender and 29 persons as gender-diverse. 33 respondents were counted as having missing values. A survey of interviewers showed that the two-stage measures of sex/gender had a high level of acceptance overall and that there were only a few interview drop-outs. On the basis of previous experience, the modified query can be used for further surveys, but should also be adapted in perspective. For this purpose, participatory studies are desirable that focus on how the acceptance of measures of sex/gender can be further improved and how hurtful experiences in the context of the questions asked can be avoided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9275517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Robert Koch Institute |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92755172022-07-25 Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences Pöge, Kathleen Rommel, Alexander Starker, Anne Prütz, Franziska Tolksdorf, Katharina Öztürk, Ilter Strasser, Sarah Born, Sabine Saß, Anke-Christine J Health Monit Concepts & Methods Sex/gender diversity is increasingly recognised by society and should be taken into account more in population-representative studies, as they are important data sources for targeting health promotion, prevention and care. In 2019, the Robert Koch Institute started a population-representative health survey with the study Health in Germany Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) with a modified, two-stage measures of sex/gender. The survey covered sex registered at birth and gender identity with an open response option. This article describes the aims, the procedure and the experiences with the operationalisation of sex/gender and the results. Out of 23,001 respondents, 22,826 persons are classified as cisgender, 113 persons as transgender and 29 persons as gender-diverse. 33 respondents were counted as having missing values. A survey of interviewers showed that the two-stage measures of sex/gender had a high level of acceptance overall and that there were only a few interview drop-outs. On the basis of previous experience, the modified query can be used for further surveys, but should also be adapted in perspective. For this purpose, participatory studies are desirable that focus on how the acceptance of measures of sex/gender can be further improved and how hurtful experiences in the context of the questions asked can be avoided. Robert Koch Institute 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9275517/ /pubmed/35891940 http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/9958 Text en © Robert Koch Institute. All rights reserved unless explicitly granted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Concepts & Methods Pöge, Kathleen Rommel, Alexander Starker, Anne Prütz, Franziska Tolksdorf, Katharina Öztürk, Ilter Strasser, Sarah Born, Sabine Saß, Anke-Christine Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences |
title | Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences |
title_full | Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences |
title_fullStr | Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences |
title_short | Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences |
title_sort | survey of sex/gender diversity in the geda 2019/2020-ehis study – objectives, procedure and experiences |
topic | Concepts & Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891940 http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/9958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pogekathleen surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences AT rommelalexander surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences AT starkeranne surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences AT prutzfranziska surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences AT tolksdorfkatharina surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences AT ozturkilter surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences AT strassersarah surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences AT bornsabine surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences AT saßankechristine surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences |