Cargando…

Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences

Sex/gender diversity is increasingly recognised by society and should be taken into account more in population-representative studies, as they are important data sources for targeting health promotion, prevention and care. In 2019, the Robert Koch Institute started a population-representative health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pöge, Kathleen, Rommel, Alexander, Starker, Anne, Prütz, Franziska, Tolksdorf, Katharina, Öztürk, Ilter, Strasser, Sarah, Born, Sabine, Saß, Anke-Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Robert Koch Institute 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891940
http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/9958
_version_ 1784745502265311232
author Pöge, Kathleen
Rommel, Alexander
Starker, Anne
Prütz, Franziska
Tolksdorf, Katharina
Öztürk, Ilter
Strasser, Sarah
Born, Sabine
Saß, Anke-Christine
author_facet Pöge, Kathleen
Rommel, Alexander
Starker, Anne
Prütz, Franziska
Tolksdorf, Katharina
Öztürk, Ilter
Strasser, Sarah
Born, Sabine
Saß, Anke-Christine
author_sort Pöge, Kathleen
collection PubMed
description Sex/gender diversity is increasingly recognised by society and should be taken into account more in population-representative studies, as they are important data sources for targeting health promotion, prevention and care. In 2019, the Robert Koch Institute started a population-representative health survey with the study Health in Germany Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) with a modified, two-stage measures of sex/gender. The survey covered sex registered at birth and gender identity with an open response option. This article describes the aims, the procedure and the experiences with the operationalisation of sex/gender and the results. Out of 23,001 respondents, 22,826 persons are classified as cisgender, 113 persons as transgender and 29 persons as gender-diverse. 33 respondents were counted as having missing values. A survey of interviewers showed that the two-stage measures of sex/gender had a high level of acceptance overall and that there were only a few interview drop-outs. On the basis of previous experience, the modified query can be used for further surveys, but should also be adapted in perspective. For this purpose, participatory studies are desirable that focus on how the acceptance of measures of sex/gender can be further improved and how hurtful experiences in the context of the questions asked can be avoided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9275517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Robert Koch Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92755172022-07-25 Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences Pöge, Kathleen Rommel, Alexander Starker, Anne Prütz, Franziska Tolksdorf, Katharina Öztürk, Ilter Strasser, Sarah Born, Sabine Saß, Anke-Christine J Health Monit Concepts & Methods Sex/gender diversity is increasingly recognised by society and should be taken into account more in population-representative studies, as they are important data sources for targeting health promotion, prevention and care. In 2019, the Robert Koch Institute started a population-representative health survey with the study Health in Germany Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) with a modified, two-stage measures of sex/gender. The survey covered sex registered at birth and gender identity with an open response option. This article describes the aims, the procedure and the experiences with the operationalisation of sex/gender and the results. Out of 23,001 respondents, 22,826 persons are classified as cisgender, 113 persons as transgender and 29 persons as gender-diverse. 33 respondents were counted as having missing values. A survey of interviewers showed that the two-stage measures of sex/gender had a high level of acceptance overall and that there were only a few interview drop-outs. On the basis of previous experience, the modified query can be used for further surveys, but should also be adapted in perspective. For this purpose, participatory studies are desirable that focus on how the acceptance of measures of sex/gender can be further improved and how hurtful experiences in the context of the questions asked can be avoided. Robert Koch Institute 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9275517/ /pubmed/35891940 http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/9958 Text en © Robert Koch Institute. All rights reserved unless explicitly granted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Concepts & Methods
Pöge, Kathleen
Rommel, Alexander
Starker, Anne
Prütz, Franziska
Tolksdorf, Katharina
Öztürk, Ilter
Strasser, Sarah
Born, Sabine
Saß, Anke-Christine
Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences
title Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences
title_full Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences
title_fullStr Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences
title_full_unstemmed Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences
title_short Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences
title_sort survey of sex/gender diversity in the geda 2019/2020-ehis study – objectives, procedure and experiences
topic Concepts & Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891940
http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/9958
work_keys_str_mv AT pogekathleen surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences
AT rommelalexander surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences
AT starkeranne surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences
AT prutzfranziska surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences
AT tolksdorfkatharina surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences
AT ozturkilter surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences
AT strassersarah surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences
AT bornsabine surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences
AT saßankechristine surveyofsexgenderdiversityinthegeda20192020ehisstudyobjectivesprocedureandexperiences