The Impact of Cirrhosis on Outcomes of Patients Admitted With Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Nationwide Study

Introduction Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is the most common acute hyperglycemic emergency in people with diabetes mellitus (DM). Cirrhosis is a consequence of chronic inflammation that is followed by hepatic fibrosis. It has been noted that cirrhosis is associated with an increased risk of developing type II DM due to altered glucose homeostasis. The prognostic value of DM in cirrhotic patients has been studied before and was found to be associated with lower survival. However, the risk of mortality and adverse events in cirrhotic patients admitted with DKA needs further evaluation. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes in patients with cirrhosis admitted to the hospital with DKA compared to non-cirrhotic patients. Methods The data for this study were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016-2019. The NIS was queried for all patients who had a discharge diagnosis of DKA. Patients with cirrhosis were identified and subclassified into compensated and decompensated cirrhosis using the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. Patients without cirrhosis were the control group. ICD-10-CM codes that have been validated for cirrhosis were utilized. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were hospital charges, length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital complications, including shock, mechanical ventilation, and acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring dialysis. Results We included 1,098,875 hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of DKA. Overall, 9,190 patients had compensated cirrhosis and 4,355 had decompensated cirrhosis. Cirrhotic patients had overall worse outcomes compared to non-cirrhotics. Decompensated cirrhotics had the highest mortality (11.26%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.36% to 13.49%) compared to compensated cirrhotics (3.54%; 95% CI: 2.79% to 4.48%) and non-cirrhotics (2.15%; 95% CI: 1.89% to 2.43%). Similarly, decompensated cirrhotics also had the highest LOS, total charges, and in-hospital complications among the groups. On multivariate analysis, decompensated cirrhosis, rather than compensated cirrhosis, was an independent predictor of higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.81 to 2.92), LOS (regression coefficient: +1.82 days; 95% CI: +1.19 to +2.44 days), hospital charges (regression coefficient: +$28,497; 95% CI: +$18,107 to +$38,887), shock (AOR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.68 to 3.18), mechanical ventilation (AOR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.58 to 2.29), and AKI requiring dialysis (AOR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.68 to 3.18). Conclusion This study showed that patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis who were admitted with DKA had the worst in-hospital outcomes. Additionally, only decompensated cirrhosis was an independent predictor of worse outcomes. Decompensated cirrhotics who develop DKA should be approached with more caution with a probable lower threshold for intensive care unit admission for a higher level management.