Cargando…

Humoral and cellular immune responses to CoronaVac assessed up to one year after vaccination

BACKGROUND: The Sinovac SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) has been demonstrated to be safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in preventing mild and severe Covid-19. Although different studies have demonstrated its short-term immunogenicity, long-term cellular and humoral response evaluations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costa, Priscilla Ramos, Correia, Carolina Argondizo, Marmorato, Mariana Prado, de Carvalho Dias, Juliana Zanatta, Thomazella, Mateus Vailant, da Silva, Amanda Cabral, de Oliveira, Ana Carolina Soares, Gusmão, Arianne Fagotti, Ferrari, Lilian, Freitas, Angela Carvalho, Patiño, Elizabeth González, Grifoni, Alba, Weiskopf, Daniela, Sette, Alessandro, Scharf, Rami, Kallas, Esper Georges, Terrassani Silveira, Cássia Gisele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.16.22272513
_version_ 1784745533893509120
author Costa, Priscilla Ramos
Correia, Carolina Argondizo
Marmorato, Mariana Prado
de Carvalho Dias, Juliana Zanatta
Thomazella, Mateus Vailant
da Silva, Amanda Cabral
de Oliveira, Ana Carolina Soares
Gusmão, Arianne Fagotti
Ferrari, Lilian
Freitas, Angela Carvalho
Patiño, Elizabeth González
Grifoni, Alba
Weiskopf, Daniela
Sette, Alessandro
Scharf, Rami
Kallas, Esper Georges
Terrassani Silveira, Cássia Gisele
author_facet Costa, Priscilla Ramos
Correia, Carolina Argondizo
Marmorato, Mariana Prado
de Carvalho Dias, Juliana Zanatta
Thomazella, Mateus Vailant
da Silva, Amanda Cabral
de Oliveira, Ana Carolina Soares
Gusmão, Arianne Fagotti
Ferrari, Lilian
Freitas, Angela Carvalho
Patiño, Elizabeth González
Grifoni, Alba
Weiskopf, Daniela
Sette, Alessandro
Scharf, Rami
Kallas, Esper Georges
Terrassani Silveira, Cássia Gisele
author_sort Costa, Priscilla Ramos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Sinovac SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) has been demonstrated to be safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in preventing mild and severe Covid-19. Although different studies have demonstrated its short-term immunogenicity, long-term cellular and humoral response evaluations are still lacking. METHODS: Cellular and humoral responses were assessed after enrollment of volunteers in the PROFISCOV phase 3 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate CoronaVac. Assays were performed using flow cytometry to evaluate cellular immune response and an antigen binding electrochemiluminescence assay to detect antigen-specific antibodies to the virus. RESULTS: Fifty-three volunteers were selected for long term assessment of their SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses. CD4(+) T cell responses (including circulating follicular helper (cTfh, CD45RA(−) CXCR5(+)) expressing CD40L, as well as non-cTfh cells expressing CXCR3) were observed early upon the first vaccine dose, increased after the second dose, remaining stable for 6-months. Memory CD4(+) T cells were detected in almost all vaccinees, the majority being central memory T cells. IgG levels against Wuhan/WH04/2020 N, S and receptor binding domain (RBD) antigens and the variants of concern (VOCs, including B.1.1.7/Alpha, B.1.351/Beta and P.1/Gamma) S and RBD antigens peaked 14 days after the second vaccine shot, and were mostly stable for a 1-year period. CONCLUSIONS: CoronaVac two-doses regimen is able to induce a potent and durable SARS-CoV-2 specific cellular response. The cellular reaction is part of a coordinated immune response that includes high levels of specific IgG levels against parental and SARS-CoV-2 VOC strains, still detected after one year.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9275662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92756622022-07-13 Humoral and cellular immune responses to CoronaVac assessed up to one year after vaccination Costa, Priscilla Ramos Correia, Carolina Argondizo Marmorato, Mariana Prado de Carvalho Dias, Juliana Zanatta Thomazella, Mateus Vailant da Silva, Amanda Cabral de Oliveira, Ana Carolina Soares Gusmão, Arianne Fagotti Ferrari, Lilian Freitas, Angela Carvalho Patiño, Elizabeth González Grifoni, Alba Weiskopf, Daniela Sette, Alessandro Scharf, Rami Kallas, Esper Georges Terrassani Silveira, Cássia Gisele medRxiv Article BACKGROUND: The Sinovac SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) has been demonstrated to be safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in preventing mild and severe Covid-19. Although different studies have demonstrated its short-term immunogenicity, long-term cellular and humoral response evaluations are still lacking. METHODS: Cellular and humoral responses were assessed after enrollment of volunteers in the PROFISCOV phase 3 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate CoronaVac. Assays were performed using flow cytometry to evaluate cellular immune response and an antigen binding electrochemiluminescence assay to detect antigen-specific antibodies to the virus. RESULTS: Fifty-three volunteers were selected for long term assessment of their SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses. CD4(+) T cell responses (including circulating follicular helper (cTfh, CD45RA(−) CXCR5(+)) expressing CD40L, as well as non-cTfh cells expressing CXCR3) were observed early upon the first vaccine dose, increased after the second dose, remaining stable for 6-months. Memory CD4(+) T cells were detected in almost all vaccinees, the majority being central memory T cells. IgG levels against Wuhan/WH04/2020 N, S and receptor binding domain (RBD) antigens and the variants of concern (VOCs, including B.1.1.7/Alpha, B.1.351/Beta and P.1/Gamma) S and RBD antigens peaked 14 days after the second vaccine shot, and were mostly stable for a 1-year period. CONCLUSIONS: CoronaVac two-doses regimen is able to induce a potent and durable SARS-CoV-2 specific cellular response. The cellular reaction is part of a coordinated immune response that includes high levels of specific IgG levels against parental and SARS-CoV-2 VOC strains, still detected after one year. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9275662/ /pubmed/35821982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.16.22272513 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Costa, Priscilla Ramos
Correia, Carolina Argondizo
Marmorato, Mariana Prado
de Carvalho Dias, Juliana Zanatta
Thomazella, Mateus Vailant
da Silva, Amanda Cabral
de Oliveira, Ana Carolina Soares
Gusmão, Arianne Fagotti
Ferrari, Lilian
Freitas, Angela Carvalho
Patiño, Elizabeth González
Grifoni, Alba
Weiskopf, Daniela
Sette, Alessandro
Scharf, Rami
Kallas, Esper Georges
Terrassani Silveira, Cássia Gisele
Humoral and cellular immune responses to CoronaVac assessed up to one year after vaccination
title Humoral and cellular immune responses to CoronaVac assessed up to one year after vaccination
title_full Humoral and cellular immune responses to CoronaVac assessed up to one year after vaccination
title_fullStr Humoral and cellular immune responses to CoronaVac assessed up to one year after vaccination
title_full_unstemmed Humoral and cellular immune responses to CoronaVac assessed up to one year after vaccination
title_short Humoral and cellular immune responses to CoronaVac assessed up to one year after vaccination
title_sort humoral and cellular immune responses to coronavac assessed up to one year after vaccination
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.16.22272513
work_keys_str_mv AT costapriscillaramos humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT correiacarolinaargondizo humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT marmoratomarianaprado humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT decarvalhodiasjulianazanatta humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT thomazellamateusvailant humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT dasilvaamandacabral humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT deoliveiraanacarolinasoares humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT gusmaoariannefagotti humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT ferrarililian humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT freitasangelacarvalho humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT patinoelizabethgonzalez humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT grifonialba humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT weiskopfdaniela humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT settealessandro humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT scharframi humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT kallasespergeorges humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination
AT terrassanisilveiracassiagisele humoralandcellularimmuneresponsestocoronavacassesseduptooneyearaftervaccination