Cargando…

Comparison of Slow and Forced Vital Capacity on Ability to Evaluate Respiratory Function in Bulbar-Involved Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) in the pulmonary function test (PFT) is generally used to evaluate the respiratory function in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The slow vital capacity (SVC) is another method to evaluate the respiratory function. Some...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Xin, Du, Chenfang, Yang, Qiong, Fan, Dongsheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35837231
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.938256
_version_ 1784745566402510848
author Huang, Xin
Du, Chenfang
Yang, Qiong
Fan, Dongsheng
author_facet Huang, Xin
Du, Chenfang
Yang, Qiong
Fan, Dongsheng
author_sort Huang, Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) in the pulmonary function test (PFT) is generally used to evaluate the respiratory function in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The slow vital capacity (SVC) is another method to evaluate the respiratory function. Some neurologists found that the FVC% was not reflective of respiratory symptoms and the percent-predicted SVC (SVC%) was found to be higher in some patients with bulbar-onset ALS. We aimed to compare the percent predicted SVC (SVC%) with FVC% in evaluating the respiratory function and investigate the associations between the associations between clinical characteristics and the difference between the SVC% and the FVC% (SVC%-FVC%) in bulbar-involved ALS patients. METHOD: This prospective study included patients with bulbar-involved ALS who visited the Peking University Third Hospital between October 2020 and November 2021. They underwent comprehensive clinical assessments, including bulbar symptom assessments, revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R), Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (Roads), and PFTs. The group differences were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: A total of 59 participants were initially enrolled, and 51 of them were included in the final analysis. In patients with bulbar-involved ALS, the SVC% (73.82 ± 21.95%) was significantly higher (p = 0.013) than the FVC% (71.42 ± 23.15%). After controlling for other relevant variables, a partial correlation analysis showed a significant correlation (r = −0.352, p = 0.041) between ALSFRS-R1 score and SVC%-FVC%. CONCLUSION: Our prospective study found that the SVC% was significantly higher and more reflective of actual respiratory function than the FVC% in patients with bulbar-involved ALS. Furthermore, the severity of dysarthria was found to be positively correlated with SVC%-FVC%, providing a clinical marker for predicting SVC%-FVC%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9275792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92757922022-07-13 Comparison of Slow and Forced Vital Capacity on Ability to Evaluate Respiratory Function in Bulbar-Involved Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Huang, Xin Du, Chenfang Yang, Qiong Fan, Dongsheng Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) in the pulmonary function test (PFT) is generally used to evaluate the respiratory function in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The slow vital capacity (SVC) is another method to evaluate the respiratory function. Some neurologists found that the FVC% was not reflective of respiratory symptoms and the percent-predicted SVC (SVC%) was found to be higher in some patients with bulbar-onset ALS. We aimed to compare the percent predicted SVC (SVC%) with FVC% in evaluating the respiratory function and investigate the associations between the associations between clinical characteristics and the difference between the SVC% and the FVC% (SVC%-FVC%) in bulbar-involved ALS patients. METHOD: This prospective study included patients with bulbar-involved ALS who visited the Peking University Third Hospital between October 2020 and November 2021. They underwent comprehensive clinical assessments, including bulbar symptom assessments, revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R), Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (Roads), and PFTs. The group differences were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: A total of 59 participants were initially enrolled, and 51 of them were included in the final analysis. In patients with bulbar-involved ALS, the SVC% (73.82 ± 21.95%) was significantly higher (p = 0.013) than the FVC% (71.42 ± 23.15%). After controlling for other relevant variables, a partial correlation analysis showed a significant correlation (r = −0.352, p = 0.041) between ALSFRS-R1 score and SVC%-FVC%. CONCLUSION: Our prospective study found that the SVC% was significantly higher and more reflective of actual respiratory function than the FVC% in patients with bulbar-involved ALS. Furthermore, the severity of dysarthria was found to be positively correlated with SVC%-FVC%, providing a clinical marker for predicting SVC%-FVC%. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9275792/ /pubmed/35837231 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.938256 Text en Copyright © 2022 Huang, Du, Yang and Fan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Huang, Xin
Du, Chenfang
Yang, Qiong
Fan, Dongsheng
Comparison of Slow and Forced Vital Capacity on Ability to Evaluate Respiratory Function in Bulbar-Involved Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
title Comparison of Slow and Forced Vital Capacity on Ability to Evaluate Respiratory Function in Bulbar-Involved Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
title_full Comparison of Slow and Forced Vital Capacity on Ability to Evaluate Respiratory Function in Bulbar-Involved Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
title_fullStr Comparison of Slow and Forced Vital Capacity on Ability to Evaluate Respiratory Function in Bulbar-Involved Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Slow and Forced Vital Capacity on Ability to Evaluate Respiratory Function in Bulbar-Involved Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
title_short Comparison of Slow and Forced Vital Capacity on Ability to Evaluate Respiratory Function in Bulbar-Involved Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
title_sort comparison of slow and forced vital capacity on ability to evaluate respiratory function in bulbar-involved amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35837231
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.938256
work_keys_str_mv AT huangxin comparisonofslowandforcedvitalcapacityonabilitytoevaluaterespiratoryfunctioninbulbarinvolvedamyotrophiclateralsclerosis
AT duchenfang comparisonofslowandforcedvitalcapacityonabilitytoevaluaterespiratoryfunctioninbulbarinvolvedamyotrophiclateralsclerosis
AT yangqiong comparisonofslowandforcedvitalcapacityonabilitytoevaluaterespiratoryfunctioninbulbarinvolvedamyotrophiclateralsclerosis
AT fandongsheng comparisonofslowandforcedvitalcapacityonabilitytoevaluaterespiratoryfunctioninbulbarinvolvedamyotrophiclateralsclerosis