Cargando…
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits
While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271311 |
_version_ | 1784745572610080768 |
---|---|
author | Liao, Wei-Yeh Sasaki, Ryoki Semmler, John G. Opie, George M. |
author_facet | Liao, Wei-Yeh Sasaki, Ryoki Semmler, John G. Opie, George M. |
author_sort | Liao, Wei-Yeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late I-wave circuits. 22 young adults (22 ± 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCS(CB)). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS(1.5)), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS(4.5)), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMS(Sham)). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP(1mV)) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEP(PA)) and anterior-posterior (MEP(AP)) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP(1mV), CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCS(CB) broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEP(AP) also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEP(PA) potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions could indicate a selective effect of CB on AP-sensitive circuits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9275832 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92758322022-07-13 Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits Liao, Wei-Yeh Sasaki, Ryoki Semmler, John G. Opie, George M. PLoS One Research Article While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late I-wave circuits. 22 young adults (22 ± 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCS(CB)). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS(1.5)), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS(4.5)), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMS(Sham)). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP(1mV)) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEP(PA)) and anterior-posterior (MEP(AP)) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP(1mV), CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCS(CB) broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEP(AP) also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEP(PA) potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions could indicate a selective effect of CB on AP-sensitive circuits. Public Library of Science 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9275832/ /pubmed/35820111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271311 Text en © 2022 Liao et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liao, Wei-Yeh Sasaki, Ryoki Semmler, John G. Opie, George M. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits |
title | Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits |
title_full | Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits |
title_fullStr | Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits |
title_full_unstemmed | Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits |
title_short | Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits |
title_sort | cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271311 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liaoweiyeh cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdisruptsneuroplasticityofintracorticalmotorcircuits AT sasakiryoki cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdisruptsneuroplasticityofintracorticalmotorcircuits AT semmlerjohng cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdisruptsneuroplasticityofintracorticalmotorcircuits AT opiegeorgem cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdisruptsneuroplasticityofintracorticalmotorcircuits |