Cargando…

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits

While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Wei-Yeh, Sasaki, Ryoki, Semmler, John G., Opie, George M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271311
_version_ 1784745572610080768
author Liao, Wei-Yeh
Sasaki, Ryoki
Semmler, John G.
Opie, George M.
author_facet Liao, Wei-Yeh
Sasaki, Ryoki
Semmler, John G.
Opie, George M.
author_sort Liao, Wei-Yeh
collection PubMed
description While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late I-wave circuits. 22 young adults (22 ± 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCS(CB)). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS(1.5)), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS(4.5)), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMS(Sham)). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP(1mV)) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEP(PA)) and anterior-posterior (MEP(AP)) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP(1mV), CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCS(CB) broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEP(AP) also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEP(PA) potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions could indicate a selective effect of CB on AP-sensitive circuits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9275832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92758322022-07-13 Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits Liao, Wei-Yeh Sasaki, Ryoki Semmler, John G. Opie, George M. PLoS One Research Article While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late I-wave circuits. 22 young adults (22 ± 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCS(CB)). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS(1.5)), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS(4.5)), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMS(Sham)). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP(1mV)) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEP(PA)) and anterior-posterior (MEP(AP)) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP(1mV), CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCS(CB) broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEP(AP) also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEP(PA) potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions could indicate a selective effect of CB on AP-sensitive circuits. Public Library of Science 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9275832/ /pubmed/35820111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271311 Text en © 2022 Liao et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liao, Wei-Yeh
Sasaki, Ryoki
Semmler, John G.
Opie, George M.
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits
title Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits
title_full Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits
title_fullStr Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits
title_full_unstemmed Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits
title_short Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits
title_sort cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271311
work_keys_str_mv AT liaoweiyeh cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdisruptsneuroplasticityofintracorticalmotorcircuits
AT sasakiryoki cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdisruptsneuroplasticityofintracorticalmotorcircuits
AT semmlerjohng cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdisruptsneuroplasticityofintracorticalmotorcircuits
AT opiegeorgem cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdisruptsneuroplasticityofintracorticalmotorcircuits