Cargando…
Injection granuloma mimicking soft tissue sarcoma following seasonal influenza vaccine administration: A case report
RATIONALE: Soft tissue masses are common within the general population with a minority diagnosed as soft tissue neoplasms. Differing between benign and malignant soft tissue processes can be a challenge given the overlapping clinical and imaging characteristics. We present the case of a 69-year-old...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35482978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028942 |
Sumario: | RATIONALE: Soft tissue masses are common within the general population with a minority diagnosed as soft tissue neoplasms. Differing between benign and malignant soft tissue processes can be a challenge given the overlapping clinical and imaging characteristics. We present the case of a 69-year-old female referred to the Orthopaedic Oncology Service for evaluation of a suspected soft tissue sarcoma in the upper arm. PATIENT CONCERNS: She reported a mass localized over the deltoid with associated tenderness 1 month after influenza vaccination. DIAGNOSIS: After thorough consideration of the patient's clinical course, history, advanced imaging, and physical examination, the diagnosis of injection granuloma associated with recent influenza vaccination was considered. INTERVENTIONS: Biopsy was deferred and close interval follow-up with clinical and imaging evaluation revealed a resolving process. OUTCOMES: The patient was followed until complete resolution of all symptoms, which occurred 5 months after initial presentation. LESSONS: It was hypothesized that due the patient's body habitus, the injection contents intended for intramuscular administration remained in the subcutaneous tissues and elicited a granulomatous reaction. This case highlights several important factors for physicians to consider in the work up of suspicious masses for which injection granuloma is on the differential diagnosis. |
---|