Cargando…

Injection granuloma mimicking soft tissue sarcoma following seasonal influenza vaccine administration: A case report

RATIONALE: Soft tissue masses are common within the general population with a minority diagnosed as soft tissue neoplasms. Differing between benign and malignant soft tissue processes can be a challenge given the overlapping clinical and imaging characteristics. We present the case of a 69-year-old...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toci, Gregory R., LiBrizzi, Christa L., Bressner, Jarred A., Levin, Adam Scott, Morris, Carol D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35482978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028942
Descripción
Sumario:RATIONALE: Soft tissue masses are common within the general population with a minority diagnosed as soft tissue neoplasms. Differing between benign and malignant soft tissue processes can be a challenge given the overlapping clinical and imaging characteristics. We present the case of a 69-year-old female referred to the Orthopaedic Oncology Service for evaluation of a suspected soft tissue sarcoma in the upper arm. PATIENT CONCERNS: She reported a mass localized over the deltoid with associated tenderness 1 month after influenza vaccination. DIAGNOSIS: After thorough consideration of the patient's clinical course, history, advanced imaging, and physical examination, the diagnosis of injection granuloma associated with recent influenza vaccination was considered. INTERVENTIONS: Biopsy was deferred and close interval follow-up with clinical and imaging evaluation revealed a resolving process. OUTCOMES: The patient was followed until complete resolution of all symptoms, which occurred 5 months after initial presentation. LESSONS: It was hypothesized that due the patient's body habitus, the injection contents intended for intramuscular administration remained in the subcutaneous tissues and elicited a granulomatous reaction. This case highlights several important factors for physicians to consider in the work up of suspicious masses for which injection granuloma is on the differential diagnosis.