Cargando…

Long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The treatment of gastric cancer (GC) with synchronous liver metastasis is still controversial. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes after different treatments of GC with synchronous liver metastasis. METHODS: Several electronic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Minghui, Yang, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35758396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029533
_version_ 1784745703552057344
author Li, Minghui
Yang, Bin
author_facet Li, Minghui
Yang, Bin
author_sort Li, Minghui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment of gastric cancer (GC) with synchronous liver metastasis is still controversial. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes after different treatments of GC with synchronous liver metastasis. METHODS: Several electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies updated on May 1, 2021. Studies assessing the overall survival (OS) after different treatments (including chemotherapy, interventional therapy, surgical therapy alone and adjunctive therapy after surgery) of GC with synchronous liver metastasis were included. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for survival variables. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies including 4312 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Adjunctive therapy after surgery performed better than surgery therapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.23, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.69–2.17), chemotherapy (HR = 1.18, 95%CrI: 0.71–1.95), and interventional therapy in terms of 1-year OS (HR = 2.03, 95%CrI: 1.22–3.37). In terms of 3-OS, adjunctive therapy after surgery showed better efficacy than surgery therapy alone (HR = 1.48, 95%CrI: 0.40–5.47), chemotherapy (HR = 1.27, 95%CrI: 0.37–4.35), and interventional therapy (HR = 3.16, 95%CrI: 0.73–13.63). For 5-OS, adjunctive therapy after surgery was superior to surgery therapy alone (HR = 1.74, 95%CrI: 0.08–37.76), chemotherapy (HR = 1.44, 95%CrI: 0.66–3.14), and interventional therapy (HR = 1.46, 95%CrI: 0.06–34.36). There were no statistical inconsistency and small-study effect existed in our network meta-analysis for 1-year, 3-year, or 5-year OS. Cluster ranking analysis performed with surface under the cumulative ranking showed adjuvant therapies after surgery (99.9, 96.7, 90.2) ranking higher than surgery therapy alone, chemotherapy, and interventional therapy for 1-year, 3-year, 5-year OS. CONCLUSION: The OS of adjuvant therapy after surgery was better than that of surgery therapy alone, chemotherapy, and interventional therapy. Adjuvant therapy after surgery is the most recommended therapy for people with GC with synchronous liver metastasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9276347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92763472022-07-13 Long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis Li, Minghui Yang, Bin Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 BACKGROUND: The treatment of gastric cancer (GC) with synchronous liver metastasis is still controversial. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes after different treatments of GC with synchronous liver metastasis. METHODS: Several electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies updated on May 1, 2021. Studies assessing the overall survival (OS) after different treatments (including chemotherapy, interventional therapy, surgical therapy alone and adjunctive therapy after surgery) of GC with synchronous liver metastasis were included. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for survival variables. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies including 4312 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Adjunctive therapy after surgery performed better than surgery therapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.23, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.69–2.17), chemotherapy (HR = 1.18, 95%CrI: 0.71–1.95), and interventional therapy in terms of 1-year OS (HR = 2.03, 95%CrI: 1.22–3.37). In terms of 3-OS, adjunctive therapy after surgery showed better efficacy than surgery therapy alone (HR = 1.48, 95%CrI: 0.40–5.47), chemotherapy (HR = 1.27, 95%CrI: 0.37–4.35), and interventional therapy (HR = 3.16, 95%CrI: 0.73–13.63). For 5-OS, adjunctive therapy after surgery was superior to surgery therapy alone (HR = 1.74, 95%CrI: 0.08–37.76), chemotherapy (HR = 1.44, 95%CrI: 0.66–3.14), and interventional therapy (HR = 1.46, 95%CrI: 0.06–34.36). There were no statistical inconsistency and small-study effect existed in our network meta-analysis for 1-year, 3-year, or 5-year OS. Cluster ranking analysis performed with surface under the cumulative ranking showed adjuvant therapies after surgery (99.9, 96.7, 90.2) ranking higher than surgery therapy alone, chemotherapy, and interventional therapy for 1-year, 3-year, 5-year OS. CONCLUSION: The OS of adjuvant therapy after surgery was better than that of surgery therapy alone, chemotherapy, and interventional therapy. Adjuvant therapy after surgery is the most recommended therapy for people with GC with synchronous liver metastasis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9276347/ /pubmed/35758396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029533 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 4500
Li, Minghui
Yang, Bin
Long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: a prisma systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35758396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029533
work_keys_str_mv AT liminghui longtermoutcomesafterdifferenttreatmentsforgastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasisaprismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yangbin longtermoutcomesafterdifferenttreatmentsforgastriccancerwithsynchronouslivermetastasisaprismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis