Cargando…
Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Although gastric ESD is minimally invasive and provides favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time for di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029172 |
_version_ | 1784745728565837824 |
---|---|
author | Kinoshita, Jun Iguchi, Mikitaka Maekita, Takao Wan, Ke Shimokawa, Toshio Fukatsu, Kazuhiro Ito, Daisaku Taki, Shinya Nishimoto, Masayuki Takao, Masaki Tabata, Yasuto Mukai, Yousuke Kitano, Masayuki |
author_facet | Kinoshita, Jun Iguchi, Mikitaka Maekita, Takao Wan, Ke Shimokawa, Toshio Fukatsu, Kazuhiro Ito, Daisaku Taki, Shinya Nishimoto, Masayuki Takao, Masaki Tabata, Yasuto Mukai, Yousuke Kitano, Masayuki |
author_sort | Kinoshita, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Although gastric ESD is minimally invasive and provides favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time for dissection. The traction-assisted approach overcomes some of the difficulties of gastric ESD, but its ability to reduce the procedure time remains unclear. The traction-assisted approach using dental floss and a clip did not reduce procedure time in the total population, but it reduced procedure time for lesions limited to the greater curvature of the upper or middle of the stomach. Although the traction direction of the clip-with-line method may be limited to the oral side via the cardia, EndoTrac ESD may provide flexible traction at any time during the procedure. This prospective randomized control study has been designed to compare the efficacy and safety of EndoTrac and conventional gastric ESD. METHODS/DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized control trial will enroll 150 patients at 2 hospitals in Japan undergoing EndoTrac or conventional ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasia. Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EndoTrac or conventional ESD. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by operator experience, tumor size, tumor location, and institution. The primary endpoint will be ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the submucosal injection to the completion of resection. Other outcomes will include the rates of adverse events and pathological curability DISCUSSION: The ability of EndoTrac ESD to reduce the long procedure time and/or adverse events observed with conventional ESD can not only reduce physical stress on the patient, but can also reduce length of hospital stay and medical costs. Reduced technical difficulty will contribute to the widespread adoption of this ESD technique worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medial Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: 000044450; Registered on June 6, 2021. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050485. PROTOCOL VERSION NUMBER: 1.1, March 1, 2022. Patient enrolment began on June 6, 2021 and is expected to be completed by July 19, 2025. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9276441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92764412022-08-01 Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial Kinoshita, Jun Iguchi, Mikitaka Maekita, Takao Wan, Ke Shimokawa, Toshio Fukatsu, Kazuhiro Ito, Daisaku Taki, Shinya Nishimoto, Masayuki Takao, Masaki Tabata, Yasuto Mukai, Yousuke Kitano, Masayuki Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Although gastric ESD is minimally invasive and provides favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time for dissection. The traction-assisted approach overcomes some of the difficulties of gastric ESD, but its ability to reduce the procedure time remains unclear. The traction-assisted approach using dental floss and a clip did not reduce procedure time in the total population, but it reduced procedure time for lesions limited to the greater curvature of the upper or middle of the stomach. Although the traction direction of the clip-with-line method may be limited to the oral side via the cardia, EndoTrac ESD may provide flexible traction at any time during the procedure. This prospective randomized control study has been designed to compare the efficacy and safety of EndoTrac and conventional gastric ESD. METHODS/DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized control trial will enroll 150 patients at 2 hospitals in Japan undergoing EndoTrac or conventional ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasia. Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EndoTrac or conventional ESD. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by operator experience, tumor size, tumor location, and institution. The primary endpoint will be ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the submucosal injection to the completion of resection. Other outcomes will include the rates of adverse events and pathological curability DISCUSSION: The ability of EndoTrac ESD to reduce the long procedure time and/or adverse events observed with conventional ESD can not only reduce physical stress on the patient, but can also reduce length of hospital stay and medical costs. Reduced technical difficulty will contribute to the widespread adoption of this ESD technique worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medial Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: 000044450; Registered on June 6, 2021. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050485. PROTOCOL VERSION NUMBER: 1.1, March 1, 2022. Patient enrolment began on June 6, 2021 and is expected to be completed by July 19, 2025. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9276441/ /pubmed/35421071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029172 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 4500 Kinoshita, Jun Iguchi, Mikitaka Maekita, Takao Wan, Ke Shimokawa, Toshio Fukatsu, Kazuhiro Ito, Daisaku Taki, Shinya Nishimoto, Masayuki Takao, Masaki Tabata, Yasuto Mukai, Yousuke Kitano, Masayuki Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | 4500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kinoshitajun tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT iguchimikitaka tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maekitatakao tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wanke tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shimokawatoshio tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fukatsukazuhiro tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT itodaisaku tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT takishinya tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nishimotomasayuki tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT takaomasaki tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tabatayasuto tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mukaiyousuke tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kitanomasayuki tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |