Cargando…

Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Although gastric ESD is minimally invasive and provides favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time for di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinoshita, Jun, Iguchi, Mikitaka, Maekita, Takao, Wan, Ke, Shimokawa, Toshio, Fukatsu, Kazuhiro, Ito, Daisaku, Taki, Shinya, Nishimoto, Masayuki, Takao, Masaki, Tabata, Yasuto, Mukai, Yousuke, Kitano, Masayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029172
_version_ 1784745728565837824
author Kinoshita, Jun
Iguchi, Mikitaka
Maekita, Takao
Wan, Ke
Shimokawa, Toshio
Fukatsu, Kazuhiro
Ito, Daisaku
Taki, Shinya
Nishimoto, Masayuki
Takao, Masaki
Tabata, Yasuto
Mukai, Yousuke
Kitano, Masayuki
author_facet Kinoshita, Jun
Iguchi, Mikitaka
Maekita, Takao
Wan, Ke
Shimokawa, Toshio
Fukatsu, Kazuhiro
Ito, Daisaku
Taki, Shinya
Nishimoto, Masayuki
Takao, Masaki
Tabata, Yasuto
Mukai, Yousuke
Kitano, Masayuki
author_sort Kinoshita, Jun
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Although gastric ESD is minimally invasive and provides favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time for dissection. The traction-assisted approach overcomes some of the difficulties of gastric ESD, but its ability to reduce the procedure time remains unclear. The traction-assisted approach using dental floss and a clip did not reduce procedure time in the total population, but it reduced procedure time for lesions limited to the greater curvature of the upper or middle of the stomach. Although the traction direction of the clip-with-line method may be limited to the oral side via the cardia, EndoTrac ESD may provide flexible traction at any time during the procedure. This prospective randomized control study has been designed to compare the efficacy and safety of EndoTrac and conventional gastric ESD. METHODS/DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized control trial will enroll 150 patients at 2 hospitals in Japan undergoing EndoTrac or conventional ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasia. Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EndoTrac or conventional ESD. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by operator experience, tumor size, tumor location, and institution. The primary endpoint will be ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the submucosal injection to the completion of resection. Other outcomes will include the rates of adverse events and pathological curability DISCUSSION: The ability of EndoTrac ESD to reduce the long procedure time and/or adverse events observed with conventional ESD can not only reduce physical stress on the patient, but can also reduce length of hospital stay and medical costs. Reduced technical difficulty will contribute to the widespread adoption of this ESD technique worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medial Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: 000044450; Registered on June 6, 2021. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050485. PROTOCOL VERSION NUMBER: 1.1, March 1, 2022. Patient enrolment began on June 6, 2021 and is expected to be completed by July 19, 2025.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9276441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92764412022-08-01 Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial Kinoshita, Jun Iguchi, Mikitaka Maekita, Takao Wan, Ke Shimokawa, Toshio Fukatsu, Kazuhiro Ito, Daisaku Taki, Shinya Nishimoto, Masayuki Takao, Masaki Tabata, Yasuto Mukai, Yousuke Kitano, Masayuki Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Although gastric ESD is minimally invasive and provides favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time for dissection. The traction-assisted approach overcomes some of the difficulties of gastric ESD, but its ability to reduce the procedure time remains unclear. The traction-assisted approach using dental floss and a clip did not reduce procedure time in the total population, but it reduced procedure time for lesions limited to the greater curvature of the upper or middle of the stomach. Although the traction direction of the clip-with-line method may be limited to the oral side via the cardia, EndoTrac ESD may provide flexible traction at any time during the procedure. This prospective randomized control study has been designed to compare the efficacy and safety of EndoTrac and conventional gastric ESD. METHODS/DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized control trial will enroll 150 patients at 2 hospitals in Japan undergoing EndoTrac or conventional ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasia. Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EndoTrac or conventional ESD. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by operator experience, tumor size, tumor location, and institution. The primary endpoint will be ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the submucosal injection to the completion of resection. Other outcomes will include the rates of adverse events and pathological curability DISCUSSION: The ability of EndoTrac ESD to reduce the long procedure time and/or adverse events observed with conventional ESD can not only reduce physical stress on the patient, but can also reduce length of hospital stay and medical costs. Reduced technical difficulty will contribute to the widespread adoption of this ESD technique worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medial Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: 000044450; Registered on June 6, 2021. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050485. PROTOCOL VERSION NUMBER: 1.1, March 1, 2022. Patient enrolment began on June 6, 2021 and is expected to be completed by July 19, 2025. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9276441/ /pubmed/35421071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029172 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 4500
Kinoshita, Jun
Iguchi, Mikitaka
Maekita, Takao
Wan, Ke
Shimokawa, Toshio
Fukatsu, Kazuhiro
Ito, Daisaku
Taki, Shinya
Nishimoto, Masayuki
Takao, Masaki
Tabata, Yasuto
Mukai, Yousuke
Kitano, Masayuki
Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial
title Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: a randomized controlled trial
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029172
work_keys_str_mv AT kinoshitajun tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT iguchimikitaka tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maekitatakao tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wanke tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shimokawatoshio tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fukatsukazuhiro tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT itodaisaku tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT takishinya tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nishimotomasayuki tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT takaomasaki tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tabatayasuto tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mukaiyousuke tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kitanomasayuki tractionmethodversusconventionalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricepithelialneoplasmsarandomizedcontrolledtrial