Cargando…

The NHS England 100,000 Genomes Project: feasibility and utility of centralised genome sequencing for children with cancer

BACKGROUND: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of cancers is becoming an accepted component of oncological care, and NHS England is currently rolling out WGS for all children with cancer. This approach was piloted during the 100,000 genomes (100 K) project. Here we share the experience of the East of Eng...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trotman, Jamie, Armstrong, Ruth, Firth, Helen, Trayers, Claire, Watkins, James, Allinson, Kieren, Jacques, Thomas S., Nicholson, James C., Burke, G. A. Amos, Behjati, Sam, Murray, Matthew J., Hook, Catherine E., Tarpey, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01788-5
_version_ 1784745803787534336
author Trotman, Jamie
Armstrong, Ruth
Firth, Helen
Trayers, Claire
Watkins, James
Allinson, Kieren
Jacques, Thomas S.
Nicholson, James C.
Burke, G. A. Amos
Behjati, Sam
Murray, Matthew J.
Hook, Catherine E.
Tarpey, Patrick
author_facet Trotman, Jamie
Armstrong, Ruth
Firth, Helen
Trayers, Claire
Watkins, James
Allinson, Kieren
Jacques, Thomas S.
Nicholson, James C.
Burke, G. A. Amos
Behjati, Sam
Murray, Matthew J.
Hook, Catherine E.
Tarpey, Patrick
author_sort Trotman, Jamie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of cancers is becoming an accepted component of oncological care, and NHS England is currently rolling out WGS for all children with cancer. This approach was piloted during the 100,000 genomes (100 K) project. Here we share the experience of the East of England Genomic Medicine Centre (East-GMC), reporting the feasibility and clinical utility of centralised WGS for individual children locally. METHODS: Non-consecutive children with solid tumours were recruited into the pilot 100 K project at our Genomic Medicine Centre. Variant catalogues were returned for local scrutiny and appraisal at dedicated genomic tumour advisory boards with an emphasis on a detailed exploration of potential clinical value. RESULTS: Thirty-six children, representing one-sixth of the national 100 K cohort, were recruited through our Genomic Medicine Centre. The diagnoses encompassed 23 different solid tumour types and WGS provided clinical utility, beyond standard-of-care assays, by refining (2/36) or changing (4/36) diagnoses, providing prognostic information (8/36), defining pathogenic germline mutations (1/36) or revealing novel therapeutic opportunities (8/36). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility and clinical value of centralised WGS for children with cancer. WGS offered additional clinical value, especially in diagnostic terms. However, our experience highlights the need for local expertise in scrutinising and clinically interpreting centrally derived variant calls for individual children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9276782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92767822022-07-14 The NHS England 100,000 Genomes Project: feasibility and utility of centralised genome sequencing for children with cancer Trotman, Jamie Armstrong, Ruth Firth, Helen Trayers, Claire Watkins, James Allinson, Kieren Jacques, Thomas S. Nicholson, James C. Burke, G. A. Amos Behjati, Sam Murray, Matthew J. Hook, Catherine E. Tarpey, Patrick Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of cancers is becoming an accepted component of oncological care, and NHS England is currently rolling out WGS for all children with cancer. This approach was piloted during the 100,000 genomes (100 K) project. Here we share the experience of the East of England Genomic Medicine Centre (East-GMC), reporting the feasibility and clinical utility of centralised WGS for individual children locally. METHODS: Non-consecutive children with solid tumours were recruited into the pilot 100 K project at our Genomic Medicine Centre. Variant catalogues were returned for local scrutiny and appraisal at dedicated genomic tumour advisory boards with an emphasis on a detailed exploration of potential clinical value. RESULTS: Thirty-six children, representing one-sixth of the national 100 K cohort, were recruited through our Genomic Medicine Centre. The diagnoses encompassed 23 different solid tumour types and WGS provided clinical utility, beyond standard-of-care assays, by refining (2/36) or changing (4/36) diagnoses, providing prognostic information (8/36), defining pathogenic germline mutations (1/36) or revealing novel therapeutic opportunities (8/36). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility and clinical value of centralised WGS for children with cancer. WGS offered additional clinical value, especially in diagnostic terms. However, our experience highlights the need for local expertise in scrutinising and clinically interpreting centrally derived variant calls for individual children. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-22 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9276782/ /pubmed/35449451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01788-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Trotman, Jamie
Armstrong, Ruth
Firth, Helen
Trayers, Claire
Watkins, James
Allinson, Kieren
Jacques, Thomas S.
Nicholson, James C.
Burke, G. A. Amos
Behjati, Sam
Murray, Matthew J.
Hook, Catherine E.
Tarpey, Patrick
The NHS England 100,000 Genomes Project: feasibility and utility of centralised genome sequencing for children with cancer
title The NHS England 100,000 Genomes Project: feasibility and utility of centralised genome sequencing for children with cancer
title_full The NHS England 100,000 Genomes Project: feasibility and utility of centralised genome sequencing for children with cancer
title_fullStr The NHS England 100,000 Genomes Project: feasibility and utility of centralised genome sequencing for children with cancer
title_full_unstemmed The NHS England 100,000 Genomes Project: feasibility and utility of centralised genome sequencing for children with cancer
title_short The NHS England 100,000 Genomes Project: feasibility and utility of centralised genome sequencing for children with cancer
title_sort nhs england 100,000 genomes project: feasibility and utility of centralised genome sequencing for children with cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01788-5
work_keys_str_mv AT trotmanjamie thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT armstrongruth thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT firthhelen thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT trayersclaire thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT watkinsjames thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT allinsonkieren thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT jacquesthomass thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT nicholsonjamesc thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT burkegaamos thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT behjatisam thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT murraymatthewj thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT hookcatherinee thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT tarpeypatrick thenhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT trotmanjamie nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT armstrongruth nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT firthhelen nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT trayersclaire nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT watkinsjames nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT allinsonkieren nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT jacquesthomass nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT nicholsonjamesc nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT burkegaamos nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT behjatisam nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT murraymatthewj nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT hookcatherinee nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer
AT tarpeypatrick nhsengland100000genomesprojectfeasibilityandutilityofcentralisedgenomesequencingforchildrenwithcancer