Cargando…

Chlorhexidine gluconate lavage during total joint arthroplasty may improve wound healing compared to dilute betadine

PURPOSE: Intraoperative wound irrigation prior to closure during total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an essential component of preventing infections and limiting health care system costs. While studies have shown the efficacy of dilute betadine in reducing infection risk, there remains concerns over i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lung, Brandon E., Le, Ryan, Callan, Kylie, McLellan, Maddison, Issagholian, Leo, Yi, Justin, McMaster, William C., Yang, Steven, So, David H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35819733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00503-w
_version_ 1784745817595183104
author Lung, Brandon E.
Le, Ryan
Callan, Kylie
McLellan, Maddison
Issagholian, Leo
Yi, Justin
McMaster, William C.
Yang, Steven
So, David H.
author_facet Lung, Brandon E.
Le, Ryan
Callan, Kylie
McLellan, Maddison
Issagholian, Leo
Yi, Justin
McMaster, William C.
Yang, Steven
So, David H.
author_sort Lung, Brandon E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Intraoperative wound irrigation prior to closure during total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an essential component of preventing infections and limiting health care system costs. While studies have shown the efficacy of dilute betadine in reducing infection risk, there remains concerns over its safety profile and theoretical inactivation by blood and serum. This study aims to compare infection and wound complications between chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and betadine lavage during TJA. METHODS: All primary TJA between 2019–2021 were analyzed at a single institution, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), wound drainage, 30 and 90-day emergency room (ER) readmission due to wound complications, aseptic loosening, and revision surgery rate were compared between patients undergoing intraoperative CHG versus betadine lavage prior to closure. Baseline demographics were controlled, and multivariate logistic regression was performed to compare complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 410 TJA, including 160 hip and 250 knee arthroplasties were included. Compared to the dilute betadine cohort, all TJA patients undergoing CHG lavage had a statistically significant lower 30 and 90-day emergency room readmission rate due to wound complications. Both hip and knee arthroplasty patients with CHG had a statistically significant lower rate of postoperative superficial drainage and dressing saturation at clinic follow-up, but only knee arthroplasty patients had significant decreased readmission rate for incisional wound vacuum placement and close inpatient monitoring of wound healing. Among all TJA, there was no significant association in the rate of PJI requiring return to the OR between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although betadine is cost-effective and has been shown to reduce PJI rates, there remains concerns in the literature over soft tissue toxicity and wound healing. This study suggests CHG may be as efficacious as dilute betadine in preventing PJI while also decreasing the risk of superficial drainage and wound complications needing unplanned ER visits during the acute postoperative period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9276865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92768652022-07-14 Chlorhexidine gluconate lavage during total joint arthroplasty may improve wound healing compared to dilute betadine Lung, Brandon E. Le, Ryan Callan, Kylie McLellan, Maddison Issagholian, Leo Yi, Justin McMaster, William C. Yang, Steven So, David H. J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: Intraoperative wound irrigation prior to closure during total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an essential component of preventing infections and limiting health care system costs. While studies have shown the efficacy of dilute betadine in reducing infection risk, there remains concerns over its safety profile and theoretical inactivation by blood and serum. This study aims to compare infection and wound complications between chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and betadine lavage during TJA. METHODS: All primary TJA between 2019–2021 were analyzed at a single institution, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), wound drainage, 30 and 90-day emergency room (ER) readmission due to wound complications, aseptic loosening, and revision surgery rate were compared between patients undergoing intraoperative CHG versus betadine lavage prior to closure. Baseline demographics were controlled, and multivariate logistic regression was performed to compare complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 410 TJA, including 160 hip and 250 knee arthroplasties were included. Compared to the dilute betadine cohort, all TJA patients undergoing CHG lavage had a statistically significant lower 30 and 90-day emergency room readmission rate due to wound complications. Both hip and knee arthroplasty patients with CHG had a statistically significant lower rate of postoperative superficial drainage and dressing saturation at clinic follow-up, but only knee arthroplasty patients had significant decreased readmission rate for incisional wound vacuum placement and close inpatient monitoring of wound healing. Among all TJA, there was no significant association in the rate of PJI requiring return to the OR between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although betadine is cost-effective and has been shown to reduce PJI rates, there remains concerns in the literature over soft tissue toxicity and wound healing. This study suggests CHG may be as efficacious as dilute betadine in preventing PJI while also decreasing the risk of superficial drainage and wound complications needing unplanned ER visits during the acute postoperative period. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9276865/ /pubmed/35819733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00503-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lung, Brandon E.
Le, Ryan
Callan, Kylie
McLellan, Maddison
Issagholian, Leo
Yi, Justin
McMaster, William C.
Yang, Steven
So, David H.
Chlorhexidine gluconate lavage during total joint arthroplasty may improve wound healing compared to dilute betadine
title Chlorhexidine gluconate lavage during total joint arthroplasty may improve wound healing compared to dilute betadine
title_full Chlorhexidine gluconate lavage during total joint arthroplasty may improve wound healing compared to dilute betadine
title_fullStr Chlorhexidine gluconate lavage during total joint arthroplasty may improve wound healing compared to dilute betadine
title_full_unstemmed Chlorhexidine gluconate lavage during total joint arthroplasty may improve wound healing compared to dilute betadine
title_short Chlorhexidine gluconate lavage during total joint arthroplasty may improve wound healing compared to dilute betadine
title_sort chlorhexidine gluconate lavage during total joint arthroplasty may improve wound healing compared to dilute betadine
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35819733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00503-w
work_keys_str_mv AT lungbrandone chlorhexidinegluconatelavageduringtotaljointarthroplastymayimprovewoundhealingcomparedtodilutebetadine
AT leryan chlorhexidinegluconatelavageduringtotaljointarthroplastymayimprovewoundhealingcomparedtodilutebetadine
AT callankylie chlorhexidinegluconatelavageduringtotaljointarthroplastymayimprovewoundhealingcomparedtodilutebetadine
AT mclellanmaddison chlorhexidinegluconatelavageduringtotaljointarthroplastymayimprovewoundhealingcomparedtodilutebetadine
AT issagholianleo chlorhexidinegluconatelavageduringtotaljointarthroplastymayimprovewoundhealingcomparedtodilutebetadine
AT yijustin chlorhexidinegluconatelavageduringtotaljointarthroplastymayimprovewoundhealingcomparedtodilutebetadine
AT mcmasterwilliamc chlorhexidinegluconatelavageduringtotaljointarthroplastymayimprovewoundhealingcomparedtodilutebetadine
AT yangsteven chlorhexidinegluconatelavageduringtotaljointarthroplastymayimprovewoundhealingcomparedtodilutebetadine
AT sodavidh chlorhexidinegluconatelavageduringtotaljointarthroplastymayimprovewoundhealingcomparedtodilutebetadine