Cargando…
A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives
After tooth extraction, dimensional changes affect the alveolar socket, leading to loss in alveolar bone height and width. Histological modifications also occur, with initial formation of a blood clot that is replaced with granulation tissue and subsequently with a provisional connective tissue matr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature Singapore
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00349-3 |
_version_ | 1784745822835965952 |
---|---|
author | Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio Orlando, Francesco Ottobelli, Marco Fiori, Davide Garagiola, Umberto |
author_facet | Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio Orlando, Francesco Ottobelli, Marco Fiori, Davide Garagiola, Umberto |
author_sort | Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio |
collection | PubMed |
description | After tooth extraction, dimensional changes affect the alveolar socket, leading to loss in alveolar bone height and width. Histological modifications also occur, with initial formation of a blood clot that is replaced with granulation tissue and subsequently with a provisional connective tissue matrix. Spontaneous healing ends with socket filling with woven bone, which is gradually replaced with lamellar bone and bone marrow. Adequate alveolar ridge dimensions and bone quality are required to assure optimal stability and osseointegration following dental implant placement. When a tooth is extracted, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures are an effective method to prevent collapse of the post-extraction socket. Heterologous bone is widely chosen by clinicians for ARP, and anorganic bone xenografts (ABXs) made bioinert by heat treatment represents the most used biomaterial in clinical applications. Collagen-preserving bone xenografts (CBXs) made of porcine or equine bone are fabricated by less invasive chemical or enzymatic treatments to remove xenogenic antigens, and these are also effective in preserving post-extraction sites. Clinical differences between anorganic bone substitutes and collagen-preserving materials are not well documented in the literature but understanding these differences could clarify how processing protocols influence biomaterial behavior in situ. This systematic review of the literature compares the dimensional changes and histological features of ABXs versus CBXs in ridge preservation procedures to promote awareness of different bone xenograft efficacies in stimulating the healing of post-extraction sockets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9276906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Nature Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92769062022-07-14 A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio Orlando, Francesco Ottobelli, Marco Fiori, Davide Garagiola, Umberto Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Review After tooth extraction, dimensional changes affect the alveolar socket, leading to loss in alveolar bone height and width. Histological modifications also occur, with initial formation of a blood clot that is replaced with granulation tissue and subsequently with a provisional connective tissue matrix. Spontaneous healing ends with socket filling with woven bone, which is gradually replaced with lamellar bone and bone marrow. Adequate alveolar ridge dimensions and bone quality are required to assure optimal stability and osseointegration following dental implant placement. When a tooth is extracted, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures are an effective method to prevent collapse of the post-extraction socket. Heterologous bone is widely chosen by clinicians for ARP, and anorganic bone xenografts (ABXs) made bioinert by heat treatment represents the most used biomaterial in clinical applications. Collagen-preserving bone xenografts (CBXs) made of porcine or equine bone are fabricated by less invasive chemical or enzymatic treatments to remove xenogenic antigens, and these are also effective in preserving post-extraction sites. Clinical differences between anorganic bone substitutes and collagen-preserving materials are not well documented in the literature but understanding these differences could clarify how processing protocols influence biomaterial behavior in situ. This systematic review of the literature compares the dimensional changes and histological features of ABXs versus CBXs in ridge preservation procedures to promote awareness of different bone xenograft efficacies in stimulating the healing of post-extraction sockets. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9276906/ /pubmed/35821286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00349-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio Orlando, Francesco Ottobelli, Marco Fiori, Davide Garagiola, Umberto A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives |
title | A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives |
title_full | A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives |
title_fullStr | A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives |
title_short | A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives |
title_sort | comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00349-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT distefanodaniloalessio acomparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives AT orlandofrancesco acomparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives AT ottobellimarco acomparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives AT fioridavide acomparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives AT garagiolaumberto acomparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives AT distefanodaniloalessio comparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives AT orlandofrancesco comparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives AT ottobellimarco comparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives AT fioridavide comparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives AT garagiolaumberto comparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives |