Cargando…

A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives

After tooth extraction, dimensional changes affect the alveolar socket, leading to loss in alveolar bone height and width. Histological modifications also occur, with initial formation of a blood clot that is replaced with granulation tissue and subsequently with a provisional connective tissue matr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio, Orlando, Francesco, Ottobelli, Marco, Fiori, Davide, Garagiola, Umberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00349-3
_version_ 1784745822835965952
author Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio
Orlando, Francesco
Ottobelli, Marco
Fiori, Davide
Garagiola, Umberto
author_facet Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio
Orlando, Francesco
Ottobelli, Marco
Fiori, Davide
Garagiola, Umberto
author_sort Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio
collection PubMed
description After tooth extraction, dimensional changes affect the alveolar socket, leading to loss in alveolar bone height and width. Histological modifications also occur, with initial formation of a blood clot that is replaced with granulation tissue and subsequently with a provisional connective tissue matrix. Spontaneous healing ends with socket filling with woven bone, which is gradually replaced with lamellar bone and bone marrow. Adequate alveolar ridge dimensions and bone quality are required to assure optimal stability and osseointegration following dental implant placement. When a tooth is extracted, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures are an effective method to prevent collapse of the post-extraction socket. Heterologous bone is widely chosen by clinicians for ARP, and anorganic bone xenografts (ABXs) made bioinert by heat treatment represents the most used biomaterial in clinical applications. Collagen-preserving bone xenografts (CBXs) made of porcine or equine bone are fabricated by less invasive chemical or enzymatic treatments to remove xenogenic antigens, and these are also effective in preserving post-extraction sites. Clinical differences between anorganic bone substitutes and collagen-preserving materials are not well documented in the literature but understanding these differences could clarify how processing protocols influence biomaterial behavior in situ. This systematic review of the literature compares the dimensional changes and histological features of ABXs versus CBXs in ridge preservation procedures to promote awareness of different bone xenograft efficacies in stimulating the healing of post-extraction sockets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9276906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92769062022-07-14 A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio Orlando, Francesco Ottobelli, Marco Fiori, Davide Garagiola, Umberto Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Review After tooth extraction, dimensional changes affect the alveolar socket, leading to loss in alveolar bone height and width. Histological modifications also occur, with initial formation of a blood clot that is replaced with granulation tissue and subsequently with a provisional connective tissue matrix. Spontaneous healing ends with socket filling with woven bone, which is gradually replaced with lamellar bone and bone marrow. Adequate alveolar ridge dimensions and bone quality are required to assure optimal stability and osseointegration following dental implant placement. When a tooth is extracted, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures are an effective method to prevent collapse of the post-extraction socket. Heterologous bone is widely chosen by clinicians for ARP, and anorganic bone xenografts (ABXs) made bioinert by heat treatment represents the most used biomaterial in clinical applications. Collagen-preserving bone xenografts (CBXs) made of porcine or equine bone are fabricated by less invasive chemical or enzymatic treatments to remove xenogenic antigens, and these are also effective in preserving post-extraction sites. Clinical differences between anorganic bone substitutes and collagen-preserving materials are not well documented in the literature but understanding these differences could clarify how processing protocols influence biomaterial behavior in situ. This systematic review of the literature compares the dimensional changes and histological features of ABXs versus CBXs in ridge preservation procedures to promote awareness of different bone xenograft efficacies in stimulating the healing of post-extraction sockets. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9276906/ /pubmed/35821286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00349-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio
Orlando, Francesco
Ottobelli, Marco
Fiori, Davide
Garagiola, Umberto
A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives
title A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives
title_full A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives
title_fullStr A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives
title_short A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives
title_sort comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00349-3
work_keys_str_mv AT distefanodaniloalessio acomparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives
AT orlandofrancesco acomparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives
AT ottobellimarco acomparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives
AT fioridavide acomparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives
AT garagiolaumberto acomparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives
AT distefanodaniloalessio comparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives
AT orlandofrancesco comparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives
AT ottobellimarco comparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives
AT fioridavide comparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives
AT garagiolaumberto comparisonbetweenanorganicboneandcollagenpreservingbonexenograftsforalveolarridgepreservationsystematicreviewandfutureperspectives