Cargando…

GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH Agonist Long Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Clinical Outcomes and Maternal-Neonatal Safety

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and maternal-neonatal safety of gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocols. METHODS: A total of 2505 women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Jieru, Xing, Weijie, Li, Tao, Lin, Hui, Ou, Jianping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846307
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.875779
_version_ 1784745827306045440
author Zhu, Jieru
Xing, Weijie
Li, Tao
Lin, Hui
Ou, Jianping
author_facet Zhu, Jieru
Xing, Weijie
Li, Tao
Lin, Hui
Ou, Jianping
author_sort Zhu, Jieru
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and maternal-neonatal safety of gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocols. METHODS: A total of 2505 women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into GnRH-ant group (n = 1514) and GnRH-a group (n = 991) according their stimulation protocol. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used for balancing the baseline of two groups. The pregnancy outcomes were analyzed in fresh transfer cycles, and the obstetric and perinatal outcomes were calculated in singleton live births of fresh cycles. The primary outcome was the live birth rate. The secondary outcome measures were maternal complications, preterm birth rate, low birthweight rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and moderate-severe OHSS rate. RESULTS: After 1:1 PSM, baseline characteristics of the GnRH-ant group and GnRH-a group were matched and assigned 991 cycles in each group. Before PSM, there were 700 fresh cycles including 237 singleton live births in the GnRH-ant group and 588 fresh cycles including 187 singleton live births in the GnRH-a group. After PSM, there were 471 fresh cycles including 166 singleton live births in the GnRH-ant group and 588 fresh cycles including 187 singleton live births in the GnRH-a group. No significant differences were observed in the live birth rate (44.6% vs 48.8%), maternal complications, preterm birth rate (9.0% vs 6.4%), and low birthweight rate (17.5% vs 24.1%) between two groups after PSM (P > 0.05). The moderate-severe OHSS rate (2.9% vs 6.0%, P = 0.002) and multiple pregnancy rate (24.5% vs 33.1%, P = 0.025) was significantly lower in the GnRH-ant group than that in the GnRH-a group after PSM. CONCLUSION: GnRH-ant protocol was comparable with GnRH-a protocol in clinical outcomes, obstetric and perinatal outcomes, and with a lower risk of OHSS. For those who want to get an effective and safe outcome, and a shorter treatment period, GnRH-ant is a suitable choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9276929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92769292022-07-14 GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH Agonist Long Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Clinical Outcomes and Maternal-Neonatal Safety Zhu, Jieru Xing, Weijie Li, Tao Lin, Hui Ou, Jianping Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and maternal-neonatal safety of gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocols. METHODS: A total of 2505 women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into GnRH-ant group (n = 1514) and GnRH-a group (n = 991) according their stimulation protocol. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used for balancing the baseline of two groups. The pregnancy outcomes were analyzed in fresh transfer cycles, and the obstetric and perinatal outcomes were calculated in singleton live births of fresh cycles. The primary outcome was the live birth rate. The secondary outcome measures were maternal complications, preterm birth rate, low birthweight rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and moderate-severe OHSS rate. RESULTS: After 1:1 PSM, baseline characteristics of the GnRH-ant group and GnRH-a group were matched and assigned 991 cycles in each group. Before PSM, there were 700 fresh cycles including 237 singleton live births in the GnRH-ant group and 588 fresh cycles including 187 singleton live births in the GnRH-a group. After PSM, there were 471 fresh cycles including 166 singleton live births in the GnRH-ant group and 588 fresh cycles including 187 singleton live births in the GnRH-a group. No significant differences were observed in the live birth rate (44.6% vs 48.8%), maternal complications, preterm birth rate (9.0% vs 6.4%), and low birthweight rate (17.5% vs 24.1%) between two groups after PSM (P > 0.05). The moderate-severe OHSS rate (2.9% vs 6.0%, P = 0.002) and multiple pregnancy rate (24.5% vs 33.1%, P = 0.025) was significantly lower in the GnRH-ant group than that in the GnRH-a group after PSM. CONCLUSION: GnRH-ant protocol was comparable with GnRH-a protocol in clinical outcomes, obstetric and perinatal outcomes, and with a lower risk of OHSS. For those who want to get an effective and safe outcome, and a shorter treatment period, GnRH-ant is a suitable choice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9276929/ /pubmed/35846307 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.875779 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhu, Xing, Li, Lin and Ou https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Zhu, Jieru
Xing, Weijie
Li, Tao
Lin, Hui
Ou, Jianping
GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH Agonist Long Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Clinical Outcomes and Maternal-Neonatal Safety
title GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH Agonist Long Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Clinical Outcomes and Maternal-Neonatal Safety
title_full GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH Agonist Long Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Clinical Outcomes and Maternal-Neonatal Safety
title_fullStr GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH Agonist Long Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Clinical Outcomes and Maternal-Neonatal Safety
title_full_unstemmed GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH Agonist Long Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Clinical Outcomes and Maternal-Neonatal Safety
title_short GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH Agonist Long Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Clinical Outcomes and Maternal-Neonatal Safety
title_sort gnrh antagonist protocol versus gnrh agonist long protocol: a retrospective cohort study on clinical outcomes and maternal-neonatal safety
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846307
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.875779
work_keys_str_mv AT zhujieru gnrhantagonistprotocolversusgnrhagonistlongprotocolaretrospectivecohortstudyonclinicaloutcomesandmaternalneonatalsafety
AT xingweijie gnrhantagonistprotocolversusgnrhagonistlongprotocolaretrospectivecohortstudyonclinicaloutcomesandmaternalneonatalsafety
AT litao gnrhantagonistprotocolversusgnrhagonistlongprotocolaretrospectivecohortstudyonclinicaloutcomesandmaternalneonatalsafety
AT linhui gnrhantagonistprotocolversusgnrhagonistlongprotocolaretrospectivecohortstudyonclinicaloutcomesandmaternalneonatalsafety
AT oujianping gnrhantagonistprotocolversusgnrhagonistlongprotocolaretrospectivecohortstudyonclinicaloutcomesandmaternalneonatalsafety