Cargando…

Comparing Seizures Captured by Rapid Response EEG and Conventional EEG Recordings in a Multicenter Clinical Study

OBJECTIVE: A recent multicenter prospective study (DECIDE trial) examined the use of Ceribell Rapid Response EEG (Rapid-EEG) in the emergent evaluation and management of critically ill patients suspected to have non-convulsive seizures. We present a detailed, patient-level examination of seizures de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurup, Deepika, Gururangan, Kapil, Desai, Masoom J., Markert, Matthew S., Eliashiv, Dawn S., Vespa, Paul M., Parvizi, Josef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.915385
_version_ 1784745863514423296
author Kurup, Deepika
Gururangan, Kapil
Desai, Masoom J.
Markert, Matthew S.
Eliashiv, Dawn S.
Vespa, Paul M.
Parvizi, Josef
author_facet Kurup, Deepika
Gururangan, Kapil
Desai, Masoom J.
Markert, Matthew S.
Eliashiv, Dawn S.
Vespa, Paul M.
Parvizi, Josef
author_sort Kurup, Deepika
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A recent multicenter prospective study (DECIDE trial) examined the use of Ceribell Rapid Response EEG (Rapid-EEG) in the emergent evaluation and management of critically ill patients suspected to have non-convulsive seizures. We present a detailed, patient-level examination of seizures detected either on initial Rapid-EEG or subsequent conventional EEG within 24 h to investigate whether seizures were missed on Rapid-EEG due to the exclusion of midline/parasagittal coverage. METHODS: We identified from 164 patients studied in the DECIDE trial those who had seizures detected on Rapid-EEG but not conventional EEG (n = 6), conventional EEG but not Rapid-EEG (n = 4), or both Rapid-EEG and conventional EEG (n = 9). We examined the electrographic characteristics of ictal and interictal findings on both devices, especially their detection in lateral or midline/parasagittal chains, and patient clinical histories to identify contributors toward discordant seizure detection. RESULTS: Seizures detected on both EEG systems had similar electrographic appearance and laterality. Seizures detected only on conventional EEG (within 24 h following Rapid-EEG) were visible in the temporal chains, and external clinical factors (e.g., treatment with anti-seizure medications, sedation, and duration of recordings) explained the delayed presentation of seizures. Patients with seizures detected only by Rapid-EEG were treated with anti-seizure medications, and subsequent conventional EEG detected interictal highly epileptiform patterns with similar laterality. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series demonstrates that electrographic data obtained from initial Rapid-EEG and subsequent conventional EEG monitoring are largely concordant relative to morphology and laterality. These findings are valuable to inform future investigation of abbreviated EEG systems to optimize management of suspected non-convulsive seizures and status epilepticus. Future, larger studies could further investigate the value of Rapid-EEG findings for forecasting and predicting seizures in long-term EEG recordings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9277057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92770572022-07-14 Comparing Seizures Captured by Rapid Response EEG and Conventional EEG Recordings in a Multicenter Clinical Study Kurup, Deepika Gururangan, Kapil Desai, Masoom J. Markert, Matthew S. Eliashiv, Dawn S. Vespa, Paul M. Parvizi, Josef Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: A recent multicenter prospective study (DECIDE trial) examined the use of Ceribell Rapid Response EEG (Rapid-EEG) in the emergent evaluation and management of critically ill patients suspected to have non-convulsive seizures. We present a detailed, patient-level examination of seizures detected either on initial Rapid-EEG or subsequent conventional EEG within 24 h to investigate whether seizures were missed on Rapid-EEG due to the exclusion of midline/parasagittal coverage. METHODS: We identified from 164 patients studied in the DECIDE trial those who had seizures detected on Rapid-EEG but not conventional EEG (n = 6), conventional EEG but not Rapid-EEG (n = 4), or both Rapid-EEG and conventional EEG (n = 9). We examined the electrographic characteristics of ictal and interictal findings on both devices, especially their detection in lateral or midline/parasagittal chains, and patient clinical histories to identify contributors toward discordant seizure detection. RESULTS: Seizures detected on both EEG systems had similar electrographic appearance and laterality. Seizures detected only on conventional EEG (within 24 h following Rapid-EEG) were visible in the temporal chains, and external clinical factors (e.g., treatment with anti-seizure medications, sedation, and duration of recordings) explained the delayed presentation of seizures. Patients with seizures detected only by Rapid-EEG were treated with anti-seizure medications, and subsequent conventional EEG detected interictal highly epileptiform patterns with similar laterality. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series demonstrates that electrographic data obtained from initial Rapid-EEG and subsequent conventional EEG monitoring are largely concordant relative to morphology and laterality. These findings are valuable to inform future investigation of abbreviated EEG systems to optimize management of suspected non-convulsive seizures and status epilepticus. Future, larger studies could further investigate the value of Rapid-EEG findings for forecasting and predicting seizures in long-term EEG recordings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9277057/ /pubmed/35847218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.915385 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kurup, Gururangan, Desai, Markert, Eliashiv, Vespa and Parvizi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Kurup, Deepika
Gururangan, Kapil
Desai, Masoom J.
Markert, Matthew S.
Eliashiv, Dawn S.
Vespa, Paul M.
Parvizi, Josef
Comparing Seizures Captured by Rapid Response EEG and Conventional EEG Recordings in a Multicenter Clinical Study
title Comparing Seizures Captured by Rapid Response EEG and Conventional EEG Recordings in a Multicenter Clinical Study
title_full Comparing Seizures Captured by Rapid Response EEG and Conventional EEG Recordings in a Multicenter Clinical Study
title_fullStr Comparing Seizures Captured by Rapid Response EEG and Conventional EEG Recordings in a Multicenter Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Seizures Captured by Rapid Response EEG and Conventional EEG Recordings in a Multicenter Clinical Study
title_short Comparing Seizures Captured by Rapid Response EEG and Conventional EEG Recordings in a Multicenter Clinical Study
title_sort comparing seizures captured by rapid response eeg and conventional eeg recordings in a multicenter clinical study
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.915385
work_keys_str_mv AT kurupdeepika comparingseizurescapturedbyrapidresponseeegandconventionaleegrecordingsinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT gururangankapil comparingseizurescapturedbyrapidresponseeegandconventionaleegrecordingsinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT desaimasoomj comparingseizurescapturedbyrapidresponseeegandconventionaleegrecordingsinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT markertmatthews comparingseizurescapturedbyrapidresponseeegandconventionaleegrecordingsinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT eliashivdawns comparingseizurescapturedbyrapidresponseeegandconventionaleegrecordingsinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT vespapaulm comparingseizurescapturedbyrapidresponseeegandconventionaleegrecordingsinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT parvizijosef comparingseizurescapturedbyrapidresponseeegandconventionaleegrecordingsinamulticenterclinicalstudy