Cargando…

Efficacy of Resveratrol in Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Animal Models: A Stratified Meta-Analysis

Background: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a serious neurosurgical emergency with extremely high morbidity and mortality rates. Resveratrol (RES), a natural polyphenolic phytoalexin, is broadly presented in a wide variety of plants. Previous research had reasonably revealed its neuroprotective eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Jiahe, Song, Rui, Luo, Siyue, Fu, Wenqiao, Ma, Yinrui, Zheng, Lian, He, Zhaohui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.905208
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a serious neurosurgical emergency with extremely high morbidity and mortality rates. Resveratrol (RES), a natural polyphenolic phytoalexin, is broadly presented in a wide variety of plants. Previous research had reasonably revealed its neuroprotective effects on experimental SAH animal models to some extent. But the results were more controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of RES in improving outcomes in SAH animal models. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases to incorporate experimental control studies on the efficacy of RES on SAH models into our research. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to compare the brain water content (BWC) and neurological score (NS) between the treatment and control groups. Results: Overall, 16 articles published from 2014 to 2022 met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of BWC showed a significant difference in favor of RES treatment (SMD: −1.026; 95% CI: −1.380, −0.672; p = 0.000) with significant heterogeneity (Q = 84.97; I(2) = 60.0%; p = 0.000). Further stratified analysis was performed for methodological differences, especially dosage, time of treatments, and time-point of outcome assessment. The meta-analysis of NS showed a significant difference in favor of RES treatment (SMD: 1.342; 95% CI: 1.089, 1.595; p = 0.000) with low heterogeneity (Q = 25.58; I(2) = 17.9%; p = 0.223). Conclusion: Generally, RES treatment showed an improvement in both pathological and behavioral outcomes in SAH animal models. The results of this study may provide a reference for preclinical and clinical studies in the future to some extent, with great significance for human health.