Cargando…

The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study

INTRODUCTION: The use of intravenous administration systems with dose error reduction software (DERS) is advocated to mitigate avoidable medication harm. No large-scale analysis of UK data has been attempted. This retrospective descriptive study aimed to estimate the prevalence of hard limit events...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sutherland, Adam, Gerrard, William S, Patel, Arif, Randall, Michelle, Weston, Emma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001708
_version_ 1784745971752632320
author Sutherland, Adam
Gerrard, William S
Patel, Arif
Randall, Michelle
Weston, Emma
author_facet Sutherland, Adam
Gerrard, William S
Patel, Arif
Randall, Michelle
Weston, Emma
author_sort Sutherland, Adam
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The use of intravenous administration systems with dose error reduction software (DERS) is advocated to mitigate avoidable medication harm. No large-scale analysis of UK data has been attempted. This retrospective descriptive study aimed to estimate the prevalence of hard limit events and to estimate the potential severity of DERS events. METHOD: Twelve months of DERS data was obtained from two NHS trusts in England. Definitions for drug categories and clinical areas were standardised and an algorithm developed to extract hard maximum (HMX) events. Subject matter experts (SMEs) were asked to rate severity of all HMX events on a scale of 0 (no harm) to 10 (death). These were analysed by clinical area and drug category, per 1000 administrations. RESULTS: A total of 745 170 infusions were administered over 644 052 patient bed days (PBDs). 45% of these (338 263) were administered with DERS enabled. HMX event incidence across the whole dataset was 17.9/1000 administrations (95% CI 17.5 to 18.4); 9.4/1000 PBDs (95% CI 9.2 to 9.7). 6067 HMX events were identified. 4604 were <2-fold deviations and excluded. HMX were identified in all drug categories. The highest incidence was antibacterial drugs (2.21%; 95% CI 2.13 to 2.29). Of the 1415 HMX events reviewed by SMEs, 747 (52.6%) were low/no harm. Drugs with greatest potential harm were antiarrhythmics (21.8/1000 administrations; 95% CI 16.3 to 29.1), parenteral anticoagulants (24.16/1000 administrations; 95% CI 15.3 to 37.9) and antiepileptics (20.86/1000 administrations; 95% CI 16.4 to 26.5). DERS has prevented severe harm or death in 110 patients in these hospitals. Medical and paediatric areas had higher prevalence of potentially harmful HMX events, but these were probably related to profile design. CONCLUSION: Compliance with DERS in this study was 45%. DERS events are common, but potential harm is rare. DERS events are not related to specific clinical areas. There are some issues with definition and design of drug profiles that may cause DERS events, thus future work should focus on implementation and data standardisation for future large-scale analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9277403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92774032022-07-28 The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study Sutherland, Adam Gerrard, William S Patel, Arif Randall, Michelle Weston, Emma BMJ Open Qual Original Research INTRODUCTION: The use of intravenous administration systems with dose error reduction software (DERS) is advocated to mitigate avoidable medication harm. No large-scale analysis of UK data has been attempted. This retrospective descriptive study aimed to estimate the prevalence of hard limit events and to estimate the potential severity of DERS events. METHOD: Twelve months of DERS data was obtained from two NHS trusts in England. Definitions for drug categories and clinical areas were standardised and an algorithm developed to extract hard maximum (HMX) events. Subject matter experts (SMEs) were asked to rate severity of all HMX events on a scale of 0 (no harm) to 10 (death). These were analysed by clinical area and drug category, per 1000 administrations. RESULTS: A total of 745 170 infusions were administered over 644 052 patient bed days (PBDs). 45% of these (338 263) were administered with DERS enabled. HMX event incidence across the whole dataset was 17.9/1000 administrations (95% CI 17.5 to 18.4); 9.4/1000 PBDs (95% CI 9.2 to 9.7). 6067 HMX events were identified. 4604 were <2-fold deviations and excluded. HMX were identified in all drug categories. The highest incidence was antibacterial drugs (2.21%; 95% CI 2.13 to 2.29). Of the 1415 HMX events reviewed by SMEs, 747 (52.6%) were low/no harm. Drugs with greatest potential harm were antiarrhythmics (21.8/1000 administrations; 95% CI 16.3 to 29.1), parenteral anticoagulants (24.16/1000 administrations; 95% CI 15.3 to 37.9) and antiepileptics (20.86/1000 administrations; 95% CI 16.4 to 26.5). DERS has prevented severe harm or death in 110 patients in these hospitals. Medical and paediatric areas had higher prevalence of potentially harmful HMX events, but these were probably related to profile design. CONCLUSION: Compliance with DERS in this study was 45%. DERS events are common, but potential harm is rare. DERS events are not related to specific clinical areas. There are some issues with definition and design of drug profiles that may cause DERS events, thus future work should focus on implementation and data standardisation for future large-scale analysis. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9277403/ /pubmed/35820711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001708 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Sutherland, Adam
Gerrard, William S
Patel, Arif
Randall, Michelle
Weston, Emma
The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study
title The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study
title_full The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study
title_fullStr The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study
title_full_unstemmed The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study
title_short The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study
title_sort impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in england: a retrospective database study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001708
work_keys_str_mv AT sutherlandadam theimpactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT gerrardwilliams theimpactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT patelarif theimpactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT randallmichelle theimpactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT westonemma theimpactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT sutherlandadam impactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT gerrardwilliams impactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT patelarif impactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT randallmichelle impactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT westonemma impactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy