Cargando…
The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study
INTRODUCTION: The use of intravenous administration systems with dose error reduction software (DERS) is advocated to mitigate avoidable medication harm. No large-scale analysis of UK data has been attempted. This retrospective descriptive study aimed to estimate the prevalence of hard limit events...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001708 |
_version_ | 1784745971752632320 |
---|---|
author | Sutherland, Adam Gerrard, William S Patel, Arif Randall, Michelle Weston, Emma |
author_facet | Sutherland, Adam Gerrard, William S Patel, Arif Randall, Michelle Weston, Emma |
author_sort | Sutherland, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The use of intravenous administration systems with dose error reduction software (DERS) is advocated to mitigate avoidable medication harm. No large-scale analysis of UK data has been attempted. This retrospective descriptive study aimed to estimate the prevalence of hard limit events and to estimate the potential severity of DERS events. METHOD: Twelve months of DERS data was obtained from two NHS trusts in England. Definitions for drug categories and clinical areas were standardised and an algorithm developed to extract hard maximum (HMX) events. Subject matter experts (SMEs) were asked to rate severity of all HMX events on a scale of 0 (no harm) to 10 (death). These were analysed by clinical area and drug category, per 1000 administrations. RESULTS: A total of 745 170 infusions were administered over 644 052 patient bed days (PBDs). 45% of these (338 263) were administered with DERS enabled. HMX event incidence across the whole dataset was 17.9/1000 administrations (95% CI 17.5 to 18.4); 9.4/1000 PBDs (95% CI 9.2 to 9.7). 6067 HMX events were identified. 4604 were <2-fold deviations and excluded. HMX were identified in all drug categories. The highest incidence was antibacterial drugs (2.21%; 95% CI 2.13 to 2.29). Of the 1415 HMX events reviewed by SMEs, 747 (52.6%) were low/no harm. Drugs with greatest potential harm were antiarrhythmics (21.8/1000 administrations; 95% CI 16.3 to 29.1), parenteral anticoagulants (24.16/1000 administrations; 95% CI 15.3 to 37.9) and antiepileptics (20.86/1000 administrations; 95% CI 16.4 to 26.5). DERS has prevented severe harm or death in 110 patients in these hospitals. Medical and paediatric areas had higher prevalence of potentially harmful HMX events, but these were probably related to profile design. CONCLUSION: Compliance with DERS in this study was 45%. DERS events are common, but potential harm is rare. DERS events are not related to specific clinical areas. There are some issues with definition and design of drug profiles that may cause DERS events, thus future work should focus on implementation and data standardisation for future large-scale analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9277403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92774032022-07-28 The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study Sutherland, Adam Gerrard, William S Patel, Arif Randall, Michelle Weston, Emma BMJ Open Qual Original Research INTRODUCTION: The use of intravenous administration systems with dose error reduction software (DERS) is advocated to mitigate avoidable medication harm. No large-scale analysis of UK data has been attempted. This retrospective descriptive study aimed to estimate the prevalence of hard limit events and to estimate the potential severity of DERS events. METHOD: Twelve months of DERS data was obtained from two NHS trusts in England. Definitions for drug categories and clinical areas were standardised and an algorithm developed to extract hard maximum (HMX) events. Subject matter experts (SMEs) were asked to rate severity of all HMX events on a scale of 0 (no harm) to 10 (death). These were analysed by clinical area and drug category, per 1000 administrations. RESULTS: A total of 745 170 infusions were administered over 644 052 patient bed days (PBDs). 45% of these (338 263) were administered with DERS enabled. HMX event incidence across the whole dataset was 17.9/1000 administrations (95% CI 17.5 to 18.4); 9.4/1000 PBDs (95% CI 9.2 to 9.7). 6067 HMX events were identified. 4604 were <2-fold deviations and excluded. HMX were identified in all drug categories. The highest incidence was antibacterial drugs (2.21%; 95% CI 2.13 to 2.29). Of the 1415 HMX events reviewed by SMEs, 747 (52.6%) were low/no harm. Drugs with greatest potential harm were antiarrhythmics (21.8/1000 administrations; 95% CI 16.3 to 29.1), parenteral anticoagulants (24.16/1000 administrations; 95% CI 15.3 to 37.9) and antiepileptics (20.86/1000 administrations; 95% CI 16.4 to 26.5). DERS has prevented severe harm or death in 110 patients in these hospitals. Medical and paediatric areas had higher prevalence of potentially harmful HMX events, but these were probably related to profile design. CONCLUSION: Compliance with DERS in this study was 45%. DERS events are common, but potential harm is rare. DERS events are not related to specific clinical areas. There are some issues with definition and design of drug profiles that may cause DERS events, thus future work should focus on implementation and data standardisation for future large-scale analysis. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9277403/ /pubmed/35820711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001708 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sutherland, Adam Gerrard, William S Patel, Arif Randall, Michelle Weston, Emma The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study |
title | The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study |
title_full | The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study |
title_fullStr | The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study |
title_short | The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study |
title_sort | impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in england: a retrospective database study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001708 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sutherlandadam theimpactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy AT gerrardwilliams theimpactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy AT patelarif theimpactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy AT randallmichelle theimpactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy AT westonemma theimpactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy AT sutherlandadam impactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy AT gerrardwilliams impactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy AT patelarif impactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy AT randallmichelle impactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy AT westonemma impactofdrugerrorreductionsoftwareonpreventingharmfuladversedrugeventsinenglandaretrospectivedatabasestudy |