Cargando…
Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Background: The advantage of prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for AF patients without documented atrial flutter is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of prophylactic CTI ablation in this population. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was co...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Radcliffe Cardiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846424 http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2021.37 |
_version_ | 1784746022525730816 |
---|---|
author | Waranugraha, Yoga Rizal, Ardian Rohman, Mohammad Saifur Tsai, Chia-Ti Chiu, Fu-Chun |
author_facet | Waranugraha, Yoga Rizal, Ardian Rohman, Mohammad Saifur Tsai, Chia-Ti Chiu, Fu-Chun |
author_sort | Waranugraha, Yoga |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The advantage of prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for AF patients without documented atrial flutter is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of prophylactic CTI ablation in this population. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted. The overall effects estimation was conducted using random effects models. The pooled effects were presented as the risk difference and standardised mean difference for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Results: A total of 1,476 patients from four studies were included. The risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias following a successful catheter ablation procedure was greater in the pulmonary vein isolation + CTI ablation group than pulmonary vein isolation alone group (34.8% versus 28.2%; risk difference 0.08; 95% CI [0.00–0.17]; p=0.04). Prophylactic CTI ablation was associated with a higher recurrent AF rate (33.8% versus 27.1%; risk difference 0.07; 95% CI [0.01–0.13]; p=0.02). Additional prophylactic CTI ablation to pulmonary vein isolation significantly increased the radio frequency application time (standardised mean difference 0.52; 95% CI [0.04–1.01]; p=0.03). Conclusion: This study suggested that prophylactic CTI ablation was an ineffective and inefficient approach in AF without documented typical atrial flutter patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9277616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Radcliffe Cardiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92776162022-07-15 Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Waranugraha, Yoga Rizal, Ardian Rohman, Mohammad Saifur Tsai, Chia-Ti Chiu, Fu-Chun Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev Clinical Electrophysiology and Ablation Background: The advantage of prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for AF patients without documented atrial flutter is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of prophylactic CTI ablation in this population. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted. The overall effects estimation was conducted using random effects models. The pooled effects were presented as the risk difference and standardised mean difference for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Results: A total of 1,476 patients from four studies were included. The risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias following a successful catheter ablation procedure was greater in the pulmonary vein isolation + CTI ablation group than pulmonary vein isolation alone group (34.8% versus 28.2%; risk difference 0.08; 95% CI [0.00–0.17]; p=0.04). Prophylactic CTI ablation was associated with a higher recurrent AF rate (33.8% versus 27.1%; risk difference 0.07; 95% CI [0.01–0.13]; p=0.02). Additional prophylactic CTI ablation to pulmonary vein isolation significantly increased the radio frequency application time (standardised mean difference 0.52; 95% CI [0.04–1.01]; p=0.03). Conclusion: This study suggested that prophylactic CTI ablation was an ineffective and inefficient approach in AF without documented typical atrial flutter patients. Radcliffe Cardiology 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9277616/ /pubmed/35846424 http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2021.37 Text en Copyright © 2022, Radcliffe Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Electrophysiology and Ablation Waranugraha, Yoga Rizal, Ardian Rohman, Mohammad Saifur Tsai, Chia-Ti Chiu, Fu-Chun Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in atrial fibrillation without documented typical atrial flutter: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Clinical Electrophysiology and Ablation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846424 http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2021.37 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waranugrahayoga prophylacticcavotricuspidisthmusablationinatrialfibrillationwithoutdocumentedtypicalatrialflutterasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rizalardian prophylacticcavotricuspidisthmusablationinatrialfibrillationwithoutdocumentedtypicalatrialflutterasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rohmanmohammadsaifur prophylacticcavotricuspidisthmusablationinatrialfibrillationwithoutdocumentedtypicalatrialflutterasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tsaichiati prophylacticcavotricuspidisthmusablationinatrialfibrillationwithoutdocumentedtypicalatrialflutterasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chiufuchun prophylacticcavotricuspidisthmusablationinatrialfibrillationwithoutdocumentedtypicalatrialflutterasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |