Cargando…

Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: The advantage of prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for AF patients without documented atrial flutter is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of prophylactic CTI ablation in this population. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waranugraha, Yoga, Rizal, Ardian, Rohman, Mohammad Saifur, Tsai, Chia-Ti, Chiu, Fu-Chun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Radcliffe Cardiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846424
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2021.37
_version_ 1784746022525730816
author Waranugraha, Yoga
Rizal, Ardian
Rohman, Mohammad Saifur
Tsai, Chia-Ti
Chiu, Fu-Chun
author_facet Waranugraha, Yoga
Rizal, Ardian
Rohman, Mohammad Saifur
Tsai, Chia-Ti
Chiu, Fu-Chun
author_sort Waranugraha, Yoga
collection PubMed
description Background: The advantage of prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for AF patients without documented atrial flutter is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of prophylactic CTI ablation in this population. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted. The overall effects estimation was conducted using random effects models. The pooled effects were presented as the risk difference and standardised mean difference for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Results: A total of 1,476 patients from four studies were included. The risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias following a successful catheter ablation procedure was greater in the pulmonary vein isolation + CTI ablation group than pulmonary vein isolation alone group (34.8% versus 28.2%; risk difference 0.08; 95% CI [0.00–0.17]; p=0.04). Prophylactic CTI ablation was associated with a higher recurrent AF rate (33.8% versus 27.1%; risk difference 0.07; 95% CI [0.01–0.13]; p=0.02). Additional prophylactic CTI ablation to pulmonary vein isolation significantly increased the radio frequency application time (standardised mean difference 0.52; 95% CI [0.04–1.01]; p=0.03). Conclusion: This study suggested that prophylactic CTI ablation was an ineffective and inefficient approach in AF without documented typical atrial flutter patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9277616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Radcliffe Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92776162022-07-15 Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Waranugraha, Yoga Rizal, Ardian Rohman, Mohammad Saifur Tsai, Chia-Ti Chiu, Fu-Chun Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev Clinical Electrophysiology and Ablation Background: The advantage of prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for AF patients without documented atrial flutter is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of prophylactic CTI ablation in this population. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted. The overall effects estimation was conducted using random effects models. The pooled effects were presented as the risk difference and standardised mean difference for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Results: A total of 1,476 patients from four studies were included. The risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias following a successful catheter ablation procedure was greater in the pulmonary vein isolation + CTI ablation group than pulmonary vein isolation alone group (34.8% versus 28.2%; risk difference 0.08; 95% CI [0.00–0.17]; p=0.04). Prophylactic CTI ablation was associated with a higher recurrent AF rate (33.8% versus 27.1%; risk difference 0.07; 95% CI [0.01–0.13]; p=0.02). Additional prophylactic CTI ablation to pulmonary vein isolation significantly increased the radio frequency application time (standardised mean difference 0.52; 95% CI [0.04–1.01]; p=0.03). Conclusion: This study suggested that prophylactic CTI ablation was an ineffective and inefficient approach in AF without documented typical atrial flutter patients. Radcliffe Cardiology 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9277616/ /pubmed/35846424 http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2021.37 Text en Copyright © 2022, Radcliffe Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.
spellingShingle Clinical Electrophysiology and Ablation
Waranugraha, Yoga
Rizal, Ardian
Rohman, Mohammad Saifur
Tsai, Chia-Ti
Chiu, Fu-Chun
Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Prophylactic Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation without Documented Typical Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in atrial fibrillation without documented typical atrial flutter: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Clinical Electrophysiology and Ablation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846424
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2021.37
work_keys_str_mv AT waranugrahayoga prophylacticcavotricuspidisthmusablationinatrialfibrillationwithoutdocumentedtypicalatrialflutterasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rizalardian prophylacticcavotricuspidisthmusablationinatrialfibrillationwithoutdocumentedtypicalatrialflutterasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rohmanmohammadsaifur prophylacticcavotricuspidisthmusablationinatrialfibrillationwithoutdocumentedtypicalatrialflutterasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tsaichiati prophylacticcavotricuspidisthmusablationinatrialfibrillationwithoutdocumentedtypicalatrialflutterasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chiufuchun prophylacticcavotricuspidisthmusablationinatrialfibrillationwithoutdocumentedtypicalatrialflutterasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis