Cargando…
Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Fever and Neutropenia: Are Empirical Antibiotic Therapies in the United States Still Effective?
BACKGROUND: Rising antimicrobial resistance rates may impact the efficacy of empirical antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in high-risk cancer patients. Lacking contemporary data about the epidemiology, antibiotic resistance patterns, and clinical outcomes from bloodstream infections (BSIs)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac240 |
_version_ | 1784746025234202624 |
---|---|
author | Zimmer, Andrea J Stohs, Erica Meza, Jane Arnold, Christopher Baddley, John W Chandrasekar, Pranatharthi El Boghdadly, Zeinab Gomez, Carlos A Maziarz, Eileen K Montoya, Jose G Pergam, Steven Rolston, Kenneth V Satlin, Michael J Satyanarayana, Gowri Shoham, Shmuel Strasfeld, Lynne Taplitz, Randy Walsh, Thomas J Young, Jo-Anne H Zhang, Yuning Freifeld, Alison G |
author_facet | Zimmer, Andrea J Stohs, Erica Meza, Jane Arnold, Christopher Baddley, John W Chandrasekar, Pranatharthi El Boghdadly, Zeinab Gomez, Carlos A Maziarz, Eileen K Montoya, Jose G Pergam, Steven Rolston, Kenneth V Satlin, Michael J Satyanarayana, Gowri Shoham, Shmuel Strasfeld, Lynne Taplitz, Randy Walsh, Thomas J Young, Jo-Anne H Zhang, Yuning Freifeld, Alison G |
author_sort | Zimmer, Andrea J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rising antimicrobial resistance rates may impact the efficacy of empirical antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in high-risk cancer patients. Lacking contemporary data about the epidemiology, antibiotic resistance patterns, and clinical outcomes from bloodstream infections (BSIs) in US cancer patients, it is unclear if current guidelines remain relevant. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 14 US cancer centers prospectively identified BSIs in high-risk febrile neutropenic (FN) patients, including those receiving chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. RESULTS: Among 389 organisms causing BSI in 343 patients, there was an equal distribution of gram-negative (GN) and gram-positive (GP) bacteria, with variability across centers. Cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam were the most commonly prescribed empirical antibiotics for FN, at 62% and 23%, respectively; a GP-directed agent was empirically included in nearly half of all FN episodes within the first 24 hours. Susceptibility to fluoroquinolones, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and carbapenems was 49%, 84%, 88%, and 96%, respectively, among GN isolates. Critical illness (CrI), defined as a new requirement for mechanical ventilation, vasopressor, or death within 30 days, occurred in 15% and did not correlate with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, organism type, initial antibiotics, or adequacy of coverage. Only severity of illness at presentation, signified by a Pitt bacteremia score ≥2, predicted for critical illness within 30 days. Mortality was 4% by day 7 and 10% overall. CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with US guidelines, cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam remain effective agents or empirical treatment for high-risk cancer patients with FN who are stable at presentation, maintaining high GN pathogen susceptibility and yielding excellent outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9277632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92776322022-07-18 Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Fever and Neutropenia: Are Empirical Antibiotic Therapies in the United States Still Effective? Zimmer, Andrea J Stohs, Erica Meza, Jane Arnold, Christopher Baddley, John W Chandrasekar, Pranatharthi El Boghdadly, Zeinab Gomez, Carlos A Maziarz, Eileen K Montoya, Jose G Pergam, Steven Rolston, Kenneth V Satlin, Michael J Satyanarayana, Gowri Shoham, Shmuel Strasfeld, Lynne Taplitz, Randy Walsh, Thomas J Young, Jo-Anne H Zhang, Yuning Freifeld, Alison G Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Rising antimicrobial resistance rates may impact the efficacy of empirical antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in high-risk cancer patients. Lacking contemporary data about the epidemiology, antibiotic resistance patterns, and clinical outcomes from bloodstream infections (BSIs) in US cancer patients, it is unclear if current guidelines remain relevant. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 14 US cancer centers prospectively identified BSIs in high-risk febrile neutropenic (FN) patients, including those receiving chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. RESULTS: Among 389 organisms causing BSI in 343 patients, there was an equal distribution of gram-negative (GN) and gram-positive (GP) bacteria, with variability across centers. Cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam were the most commonly prescribed empirical antibiotics for FN, at 62% and 23%, respectively; a GP-directed agent was empirically included in nearly half of all FN episodes within the first 24 hours. Susceptibility to fluoroquinolones, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and carbapenems was 49%, 84%, 88%, and 96%, respectively, among GN isolates. Critical illness (CrI), defined as a new requirement for mechanical ventilation, vasopressor, or death within 30 days, occurred in 15% and did not correlate with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, organism type, initial antibiotics, or adequacy of coverage. Only severity of illness at presentation, signified by a Pitt bacteremia score ≥2, predicted for critical illness within 30 days. Mortality was 4% by day 7 and 10% overall. CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with US guidelines, cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam remain effective agents or empirical treatment for high-risk cancer patients with FN who are stable at presentation, maintaining high GN pathogen susceptibility and yielding excellent outcomes. Oxford University Press 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9277632/ /pubmed/35854988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac240 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Article Zimmer, Andrea J Stohs, Erica Meza, Jane Arnold, Christopher Baddley, John W Chandrasekar, Pranatharthi El Boghdadly, Zeinab Gomez, Carlos A Maziarz, Eileen K Montoya, Jose G Pergam, Steven Rolston, Kenneth V Satlin, Michael J Satyanarayana, Gowri Shoham, Shmuel Strasfeld, Lynne Taplitz, Randy Walsh, Thomas J Young, Jo-Anne H Zhang, Yuning Freifeld, Alison G Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Fever and Neutropenia: Are Empirical Antibiotic Therapies in the United States Still Effective? |
title | Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Fever and Neutropenia: Are Empirical Antibiotic Therapies in the United States Still Effective? |
title_full | Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Fever and Neutropenia: Are Empirical Antibiotic Therapies in the United States Still Effective? |
title_fullStr | Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Fever and Neutropenia: Are Empirical Antibiotic Therapies in the United States Still Effective? |
title_full_unstemmed | Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Fever and Neutropenia: Are Empirical Antibiotic Therapies in the United States Still Effective? |
title_short | Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Fever and Neutropenia: Are Empirical Antibiotic Therapies in the United States Still Effective? |
title_sort | bloodstream infections in hematologic malignancy patients with fever and neutropenia: are empirical antibiotic therapies in the united states still effective? |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zimmerandreaj bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT stohserica bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT mezajane bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT arnoldchristopher bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT baddleyjohnw bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT chandrasekarpranatharthi bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT elboghdadlyzeinab bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT gomezcarlosa bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT maziarzeileenk bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT montoyajoseg bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT pergamsteven bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT rolstonkennethv bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT satlinmichaelj bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT satyanarayanagowri bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT shohamshmuel bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT strasfeldlynne bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT taplitzrandy bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT walshthomasj bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT youngjoanneh bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT zhangyuning bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective AT freifeldalisong bloodstreaminfectionsinhematologicmalignancypatientswithfeverandneutropeniaareempiricalantibiotictherapiesintheunitedstatesstilleffective |