Cargando…
Simulation-based randomized trial of medical emergency cognitive aids
BACKGROUND: Medical emergencies are complex and stressful, especially for the young and inexperienced. Cognitive aids (CA) have been shown to facilitate management of simulated medical emergencies by experienced teams. In this randomized trial we evaluated guideline adherence and treatment efficacy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01028-y |
_version_ | 1784746071304437760 |
---|---|
author | Sellmann, Timur Alchab, Samer Wetzchewald, Dietmar Meyer, Joerg Rassaf, Tienush Thal, Serge C. Burisch, Christian Marsch, Stephan Breuckmann, Frank |
author_facet | Sellmann, Timur Alchab, Samer Wetzchewald, Dietmar Meyer, Joerg Rassaf, Tienush Thal, Serge C. Burisch, Christian Marsch, Stephan Breuckmann, Frank |
author_sort | Sellmann, Timur |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medical emergencies are complex and stressful, especially for the young and inexperienced. Cognitive aids (CA) have been shown to facilitate management of simulated medical emergencies by experienced teams. In this randomized trial we evaluated guideline adherence and treatment efficacy in simulated medical emergencies managed by residents with and without CA. METHODS: Physicians attending educational courses executed simulated medical emergencies. Teams were randomly assigned to manage emergencies with or without CA. Primary outcome was risk reduction of essential working steps. Secondary outcomes included prior experience in emergency medicine and CA, perceptions of usefulness, clinical relevance, acceptability, and accuracy in CA selection. Participants were grouped as “medical” (internal medicine and neurology) and “perioperative” (anesthesia and surgery) regarding their specialty. The study was designed as a prospective randomized single-blind study that was approved by the ethical committee of the University Duisburg-Essen (19-8966-BO). Trial registration: DRKS, DRKS00024781. Registered 16 March 2021—Retrospectively registered, http://www.drks.de/DRKS00024781. RESULTS: Eighty teams participated in 240 simulated medical emergencies. Cognitive aid usage led to 9% absolute and 15% relative risk reduction. Per protocol analysis showed 17% absolute and 28% relative risk reduction. Wrong CA were used in 4%. Cognitive aids were judged as helpful by 94% of the participants. Teams performed significantly better when emergency CA were available (p < 0.05 for successful completion of critical work steps). Stress reduction using CA was more likely in “medical” than in “perioperative” subspecialties (3.7 ± 1.2 vs. 2.9 ± 1.2, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a high-fidelity simulation study, CA usage was associated with significant reduction of incorrect working steps in medical emergencies management and was characterized by high acceptance. These findings suggest that CA for medical emergencies may have the potential to improve emergency care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01028-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9277856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92778562022-07-14 Simulation-based randomized trial of medical emergency cognitive aids Sellmann, Timur Alchab, Samer Wetzchewald, Dietmar Meyer, Joerg Rassaf, Tienush Thal, Serge C. Burisch, Christian Marsch, Stephan Breuckmann, Frank Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Medical emergencies are complex and stressful, especially for the young and inexperienced. Cognitive aids (CA) have been shown to facilitate management of simulated medical emergencies by experienced teams. In this randomized trial we evaluated guideline adherence and treatment efficacy in simulated medical emergencies managed by residents with and without CA. METHODS: Physicians attending educational courses executed simulated medical emergencies. Teams were randomly assigned to manage emergencies with or without CA. Primary outcome was risk reduction of essential working steps. Secondary outcomes included prior experience in emergency medicine and CA, perceptions of usefulness, clinical relevance, acceptability, and accuracy in CA selection. Participants were grouped as “medical” (internal medicine and neurology) and “perioperative” (anesthesia and surgery) regarding their specialty. The study was designed as a prospective randomized single-blind study that was approved by the ethical committee of the University Duisburg-Essen (19-8966-BO). Trial registration: DRKS, DRKS00024781. Registered 16 March 2021—Retrospectively registered, http://www.drks.de/DRKS00024781. RESULTS: Eighty teams participated in 240 simulated medical emergencies. Cognitive aid usage led to 9% absolute and 15% relative risk reduction. Per protocol analysis showed 17% absolute and 28% relative risk reduction. Wrong CA were used in 4%. Cognitive aids were judged as helpful by 94% of the participants. Teams performed significantly better when emergency CA were available (p < 0.05 for successful completion of critical work steps). Stress reduction using CA was more likely in “medical” than in “perioperative” subspecialties (3.7 ± 1.2 vs. 2.9 ± 1.2, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a high-fidelity simulation study, CA usage was associated with significant reduction of incorrect working steps in medical emergencies management and was characterized by high acceptance. These findings suggest that CA for medical emergencies may have the potential to improve emergency care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01028-y. BioMed Central 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9277856/ /pubmed/35820939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01028-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sellmann, Timur Alchab, Samer Wetzchewald, Dietmar Meyer, Joerg Rassaf, Tienush Thal, Serge C. Burisch, Christian Marsch, Stephan Breuckmann, Frank Simulation-based randomized trial of medical emergency cognitive aids |
title | Simulation-based randomized trial of medical emergency cognitive aids |
title_full | Simulation-based randomized trial of medical emergency cognitive aids |
title_fullStr | Simulation-based randomized trial of medical emergency cognitive aids |
title_full_unstemmed | Simulation-based randomized trial of medical emergency cognitive aids |
title_short | Simulation-based randomized trial of medical emergency cognitive aids |
title_sort | simulation-based randomized trial of medical emergency cognitive aids |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01028-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sellmanntimur simulationbasedrandomizedtrialofmedicalemergencycognitiveaids AT alchabsamer simulationbasedrandomizedtrialofmedicalemergencycognitiveaids AT wetzchewalddietmar simulationbasedrandomizedtrialofmedicalemergencycognitiveaids AT meyerjoerg simulationbasedrandomizedtrialofmedicalemergencycognitiveaids AT rassaftienush simulationbasedrandomizedtrialofmedicalemergencycognitiveaids AT thalsergec simulationbasedrandomizedtrialofmedicalemergencycognitiveaids AT burischchristian simulationbasedrandomizedtrialofmedicalemergencycognitiveaids AT marschstephan simulationbasedrandomizedtrialofmedicalemergencycognitiveaids AT breuckmannfrank simulationbasedrandomizedtrialofmedicalemergencycognitiveaids |