Cargando…

Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps

BACKGROUND: A missed diagnosis of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy may be associated with the occurrence of interval colorectal cancer. The risk factors for a missed diagnosis or a method to predict the risk of a missed diagnosis of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy remain unidentified. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiaobo, Guo, Haiyang, Tang, Yong, Chen, Lin, Wang, Xianfei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02415-6
_version_ 1784746078782881792
author Wang, Xiaobo
Guo, Haiyang
Tang, Yong
Chen, Lin
Wang, Xianfei
author_facet Wang, Xiaobo
Guo, Haiyang
Tang, Yong
Chen, Lin
Wang, Xianfei
author_sort Wang, Xiaobo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A missed diagnosis of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy may be associated with the occurrence of interval colorectal cancer. The risk factors for a missed diagnosis or a method to predict the risk of a missed diagnosis of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy remain unidentified. METHODS: The clinical data of patients who underwent two colonoscopies within three months at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College between February 2017 and August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Independent risk factors for missed diagnoses were identified, and a nomogram was established to predict the risk of missed diagnoses. The prediction performance of the nomogram was evaluated using C-index and calibration curves, and its clinical application value was assessed using the Youden index and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Independent influencing factors for missed diagnoses included age, endoscopist experience, bowel preparation, retroflected view, withdrawal time, number of polyps in the right colon, and number of polyps ≥ 6 mm. The C-index of the nomogram in the training and validation cohorts was 0.763 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.724 − 0.807) and 0.726 (95%CI: 0.657 − 0.794), respectively. The optimal cut-off value of the nomogram calculated using the Youden index was 152.2 points. Under the cut-off value, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 67.1%, 75.7%, 45.8%, and 88.2%, respectively, in the training cohort, and 57.1%, 79.9%, 53.3%, and 82.3%, respectively, in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram provides a reference value for clinicians to analyse the risk of a missed diagnosis of colorectal polyps in individuals, identify high-risk groups, and formulate appropriate follow-up strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9277885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92778852022-07-14 Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps Wang, Xiaobo Guo, Haiyang Tang, Yong Chen, Lin Wang, Xianfei BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: A missed diagnosis of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy may be associated with the occurrence of interval colorectal cancer. The risk factors for a missed diagnosis or a method to predict the risk of a missed diagnosis of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy remain unidentified. METHODS: The clinical data of patients who underwent two colonoscopies within three months at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College between February 2017 and August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Independent risk factors for missed diagnoses were identified, and a nomogram was established to predict the risk of missed diagnoses. The prediction performance of the nomogram was evaluated using C-index and calibration curves, and its clinical application value was assessed using the Youden index and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Independent influencing factors for missed diagnoses included age, endoscopist experience, bowel preparation, retroflected view, withdrawal time, number of polyps in the right colon, and number of polyps ≥ 6 mm. The C-index of the nomogram in the training and validation cohorts was 0.763 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.724 − 0.807) and 0.726 (95%CI: 0.657 − 0.794), respectively. The optimal cut-off value of the nomogram calculated using the Youden index was 152.2 points. Under the cut-off value, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 67.1%, 75.7%, 45.8%, and 88.2%, respectively, in the training cohort, and 57.1%, 79.9%, 53.3%, and 82.3%, respectively, in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram provides a reference value for clinicians to analyse the risk of a missed diagnosis of colorectal polyps in individuals, identify high-risk groups, and formulate appropriate follow-up strategies. BioMed Central 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9277885/ /pubmed/35820825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02415-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Xiaobo
Guo, Haiyang
Tang, Yong
Chen, Lin
Wang, Xianfei
Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps
title Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps
title_full Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps
title_fullStr Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps
title_full_unstemmed Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps
title_short Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps
title_sort establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02415-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiaobo establishmentandevaluationofanomogrampredictingrisksofmisseddiagnosesofcolorectalpolyps
AT guohaiyang establishmentandevaluationofanomogrampredictingrisksofmisseddiagnosesofcolorectalpolyps
AT tangyong establishmentandevaluationofanomogrampredictingrisksofmisseddiagnosesofcolorectalpolyps
AT chenlin establishmentandevaluationofanomogrampredictingrisksofmisseddiagnosesofcolorectalpolyps
AT wangxianfei establishmentandevaluationofanomogrampredictingrisksofmisseddiagnosesofcolorectalpolyps