Cargando…

A process for creating data report-back tools to improve equity in environmental health

BACKGROUND: Although there is increasing interest in reporting results of environmental research efforts back to participants, evidence-based tools have not yet been applied to developed materials to ensure their accessibility in terms of literacy, numeracy, and data visualization demand. Additional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomsho, Kathryn S., Polka, Erin, Chacker, Stacey, Queeley, David, Alvarez, Marty, Scammell, Madeleine K., Emmons, Karen M., Rudd, Rima E., Adamkiewicz, Gary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00880-w
_version_ 1784746090191388672
author Tomsho, Kathryn S.
Polka, Erin
Chacker, Stacey
Queeley, David
Alvarez, Marty
Scammell, Madeleine K.
Emmons, Karen M.
Rudd, Rima E.
Adamkiewicz, Gary
author_facet Tomsho, Kathryn S.
Polka, Erin
Chacker, Stacey
Queeley, David
Alvarez, Marty
Scammell, Madeleine K.
Emmons, Karen M.
Rudd, Rima E.
Adamkiewicz, Gary
author_sort Tomsho, Kathryn S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although there is increasing interest in reporting results of environmental research efforts back to participants, evidence-based tools have not yet been applied to developed materials to ensure their accessibility in terms of literacy, numeracy, and data visualization demand. Additionally, there is not yet guidance as to how to formally assess the created materials to assure a match with the intended audience. METHODS: Relying on formative qualitative research with participants of an indoor air quality study in Dorchester, Massachusetts, we identified means of enhancing accessibility of indoor air quality data report-back materials for participants. Participants (n = 20) engaged in semi-structured interviews in which they described challenges they encountered with scientific and medical materials and outlined written and verbal communication techniques that would help facilitate engagement with and accessibility of environmental health report-back materials. We coupled these insights from participants with best practice guidelines for written materials by operationalizing health literacy tools to produce accessible audience-informed data report-back materials. RESULTS: The resulting data report-back materials had a 7th -grade reading level, and between a 4th -8th grade level of overall document complexity. The numeracy skills required to engage with the material were of the lowest demand, and we incorporated best practices for risk communication and facilitating understanding and actionability of the materials. Use of a rigorous assessment tool provides evidence of accessibility and appropriateness of the material for the audience. CONCLUSIONS: We outline a process for developing and evaluating environmental health data reports that are tailored to inspire risk-reduction actions, and are demonstrably accessible in terms of their literacy, numeracy, and data visualization demand. Adapting health literacy tools to create and evaluate environmental data report-back materials is a novel and evidence-based means of ensuring their accessibility. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12940-022-00880-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9277935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92779352022-07-14 A process for creating data report-back tools to improve equity in environmental health Tomsho, Kathryn S. Polka, Erin Chacker, Stacey Queeley, David Alvarez, Marty Scammell, Madeleine K. Emmons, Karen M. Rudd, Rima E. Adamkiewicz, Gary Environ Health Research BACKGROUND: Although there is increasing interest in reporting results of environmental research efforts back to participants, evidence-based tools have not yet been applied to developed materials to ensure their accessibility in terms of literacy, numeracy, and data visualization demand. Additionally, there is not yet guidance as to how to formally assess the created materials to assure a match with the intended audience. METHODS: Relying on formative qualitative research with participants of an indoor air quality study in Dorchester, Massachusetts, we identified means of enhancing accessibility of indoor air quality data report-back materials for participants. Participants (n = 20) engaged in semi-structured interviews in which they described challenges they encountered with scientific and medical materials and outlined written and verbal communication techniques that would help facilitate engagement with and accessibility of environmental health report-back materials. We coupled these insights from participants with best practice guidelines for written materials by operationalizing health literacy tools to produce accessible audience-informed data report-back materials. RESULTS: The resulting data report-back materials had a 7th -grade reading level, and between a 4th -8th grade level of overall document complexity. The numeracy skills required to engage with the material were of the lowest demand, and we incorporated best practices for risk communication and facilitating understanding and actionability of the materials. Use of a rigorous assessment tool provides evidence of accessibility and appropriateness of the material for the audience. CONCLUSIONS: We outline a process for developing and evaluating environmental health data reports that are tailored to inspire risk-reduction actions, and are demonstrably accessible in terms of their literacy, numeracy, and data visualization demand. Adapting health literacy tools to create and evaluate environmental data report-back materials is a novel and evidence-based means of ensuring their accessibility. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12940-022-00880-w. BioMed Central 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9277935/ /pubmed/35821055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00880-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tomsho, Kathryn S.
Polka, Erin
Chacker, Stacey
Queeley, David
Alvarez, Marty
Scammell, Madeleine K.
Emmons, Karen M.
Rudd, Rima E.
Adamkiewicz, Gary
A process for creating data report-back tools to improve equity in environmental health
title A process for creating data report-back tools to improve equity in environmental health
title_full A process for creating data report-back tools to improve equity in environmental health
title_fullStr A process for creating data report-back tools to improve equity in environmental health
title_full_unstemmed A process for creating data report-back tools to improve equity in environmental health
title_short A process for creating data report-back tools to improve equity in environmental health
title_sort process for creating data report-back tools to improve equity in environmental health
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00880-w
work_keys_str_mv AT tomshokathryns aprocessforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT polkaerin aprocessforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT chackerstacey aprocessforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT queeleydavid aprocessforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT alvarezmarty aprocessforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT scammellmadeleinek aprocessforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT emmonskarenm aprocessforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT ruddrimae aprocessforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT adamkiewiczgary aprocessforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT tomshokathryns processforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT polkaerin processforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT chackerstacey processforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT queeleydavid processforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT alvarezmarty processforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT scammellmadeleinek processforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT emmonskarenm processforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT ruddrimae processforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth
AT adamkiewiczgary processforcreatingdatareportbacktoolstoimproveequityinenvironmentalhealth