Cargando…
Priority Setting in HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria – New Cost-Effectiveness Results From WHO-CHOICE
Background: This paper forms part of an update of the World Health Organization Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective (WHO-CHOICE) programmes. It provides an assessment of global health system performance during the first decade of the 21st century (2000-2010) with respect to allocative eff...
Autores principales: | Ralaidovy, Ambinintsoa H., Lauer, Jeremy Addison, Pretorius, Carel, Briët, Olivier JT, Patouillard, Edith |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590743 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.251 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cost-effective interventions for breast cancer, cervical cancer, and colorectal cancer: new results from WHO-CHOICE
por: Ralaidovy, Ambinintsoa H., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent road traffic injuries in eastern sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia: new results from WHO-CHOICE
por: Ralaidovy, Ambinintsoa H., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Malaria intervention scale-up in Africa: effectiveness predictions for health programme planning tools, based on dynamic transmission modelling
por: Korenromp, Eline, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Progressive Realisation of Universal Health Coverage in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Beyond the "Best Buys"
por: Bertram, Melanie Y., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: An Update From WHO CHOICE
por: Bertram, Melanie Y., et al.
Publicado: (2021)