Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: An Update From WHO CHOICE

The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective (CHOICE) programme has been a global leader in the field of economic evaluation, specifically cost-effectiveness analysis for almost 20 years. WHO-CHOICE takes a "generalized" approach to cost-effectiven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertram, Melanie Y., Lauer, Jeremy A., Stenberg, Karin, Edejer, Tessa Tan Torres
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Perspective
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619929
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.244
_version_ 1784746173974708224
author Bertram, Melanie Y.
Lauer, Jeremy A.
Stenberg, Karin
Edejer, Tessa Tan Torres
author_facet Bertram, Melanie Y.
Lauer, Jeremy A.
Stenberg, Karin
Edejer, Tessa Tan Torres
author_sort Bertram, Melanie Y.
collection PubMed
description The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective (CHOICE) programme has been a global leader in the field of economic evaluation, specifically cost-effectiveness analysis for almost 20 years. WHO-CHOICE takes a "generalized" approach to cost-effectiveness analysis that can be seen as a quantitative assessment of current and future efficiency within a health system. This supports priority setting processes, ensuring that health stewards know how to spend resources in order to achieve the highest health gain as one consideration in strategic planning. This approach is unique in the global health landscape. This paper provides an overview of the methodological approach, updates to analytic framework over the past 10 years, and the added value of the WHO-CHOICE approach in supporting decision makers as they aim to use limited health resources to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9278384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92783842022-07-22 Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: An Update From WHO CHOICE Bertram, Melanie Y. Lauer, Jeremy A. Stenberg, Karin Edejer, Tessa Tan Torres Int J Health Policy Manag Perspective The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective (CHOICE) programme has been a global leader in the field of economic evaluation, specifically cost-effectiveness analysis for almost 20 years. WHO-CHOICE takes a "generalized" approach to cost-effectiveness analysis that can be seen as a quantitative assessment of current and future efficiency within a health system. This supports priority setting processes, ensuring that health stewards know how to spend resources in order to achieve the highest health gain as one consideration in strategic planning. This approach is unique in the global health landscape. This paper provides an overview of the methodological approach, updates to analytic framework over the past 10 years, and the added value of the WHO-CHOICE approach in supporting decision makers as they aim to use limited health resources to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9278384/ /pubmed/33619929 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.244 Text en © 2021 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Perspective
Bertram, Melanie Y.
Lauer, Jeremy A.
Stenberg, Karin
Edejer, Tessa Tan Torres
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: An Update From WHO CHOICE
title Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: An Update From WHO CHOICE
title_full Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: An Update From WHO CHOICE
title_fullStr Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: An Update From WHO CHOICE
title_full_unstemmed Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: An Update From WHO CHOICE
title_short Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: An Update From WHO CHOICE
title_sort methods for the economic evaluation of health care interventions for priority setting in the health system: an update from who choice
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619929
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.244
work_keys_str_mv AT bertrammelaniey methodsfortheeconomicevaluationofhealthcareinterventionsforprioritysettinginthehealthsystemanupdatefromwhochoice
AT lauerjeremya methodsfortheeconomicevaluationofhealthcareinterventionsforprioritysettinginthehealthsystemanupdatefromwhochoice
AT stenbergkarin methodsfortheeconomicevaluationofhealthcareinterventionsforprioritysettinginthehealthsystemanupdatefromwhochoice
AT edejertessatantorres methodsfortheeconomicevaluationofhealthcareinterventionsforprioritysettinginthehealthsystemanupdatefromwhochoice

Ejemplares similares