Cargando…
Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy
Background: Public policy approaches to funding paediatric medicines in advanced health systems remain understudied. In particular, the ethical and social values dimensions of health technology assessment (HTA) and drug coverage decisions for children have received almost no attention in research or...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801223 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.144 |
_version_ | 1784746192807133184 |
---|---|
author | Denburg, Avram E. Giacomini, Mita Ungar, Wendy Abelson, Julia |
author_facet | Denburg, Avram E. Giacomini, Mita Ungar, Wendy Abelson, Julia |
author_sort | Denburg, Avram E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Public policy approaches to funding paediatric medicines in advanced health systems remain understudied. In particular, the ethical and social values dimensions of health technology assessment (HTA) and drug coverage decisions for children have received almost no attention in research or policy. Methods: To elicit and understand the social values that influence decision-making for public funding of paediatric drugs, we undertook a series of in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a stratified purposive sample (n = 22) of stakeholders involved with or affected by drug funding decisions for children at the provincial (Ontario) and national levels in Canada. Constructivist grounded theory methodology guided data collection and thematic analysis. Results: Our study provides empirical evidence about the unique ethical and social values dimensions of HTA for children, and describes a novel social values typology for paediatric drug policy decision-making. Three principal categories of values emerged from stakeholder reflections on HTA and drug policy-making for children: procedural values, structural values, and sociocultural values. Key findings include the importance of attention to the procedural legitimacy of HTA for children, with emphasis on the inclusion of child health voices in processes of technology appraisal and policy uptake; a role for HTA institutions to consider the equity impacts of technologies, both in setting review priorities and in assessing the value of technologies for public coverage; and the potential benefits of a distinct national framework to guide drug policy for children. Conclusion: Current approaches to HTA are not well designed for the realities of child health and illness, nor the societal priorities regarding children that our study identified. This research generates new knowledge to inform decision-making on paediatric drugs by HTA institutions and government payers in Canada and other publicly-funded health systems, through insights into the relevant social values for child drug funding decisions from varied stakeholder groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9278467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92784672022-07-22 Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy Denburg, Avram E. Giacomini, Mita Ungar, Wendy Abelson, Julia Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: Public policy approaches to funding paediatric medicines in advanced health systems remain understudied. In particular, the ethical and social values dimensions of health technology assessment (HTA) and drug coverage decisions for children have received almost no attention in research or policy. Methods: To elicit and understand the social values that influence decision-making for public funding of paediatric drugs, we undertook a series of in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a stratified purposive sample (n = 22) of stakeholders involved with or affected by drug funding decisions for children at the provincial (Ontario) and national levels in Canada. Constructivist grounded theory methodology guided data collection and thematic analysis. Results: Our study provides empirical evidence about the unique ethical and social values dimensions of HTA for children, and describes a novel social values typology for paediatric drug policy decision-making. Three principal categories of values emerged from stakeholder reflections on HTA and drug policy-making for children: procedural values, structural values, and sociocultural values. Key findings include the importance of attention to the procedural legitimacy of HTA for children, with emphasis on the inclusion of child health voices in processes of technology appraisal and policy uptake; a role for HTA institutions to consider the equity impacts of technologies, both in setting review priorities and in assessing the value of technologies for public coverage; and the potential benefits of a distinct national framework to guide drug policy for children. Conclusion: Current approaches to HTA are not well designed for the realities of child health and illness, nor the societal priorities regarding children that our study identified. This research generates new knowledge to inform decision-making on paediatric drugs by HTA institutions and government payers in Canada and other publicly-funded health systems, through insights into the relevant social values for child drug funding decisions from varied stakeholder groups. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9278467/ /pubmed/32801223 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.144 Text en © 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Denburg, Avram E. Giacomini, Mita Ungar, Wendy Abelson, Julia Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy |
title | Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy |
title_full | Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy |
title_fullStr | Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy |
title_short | Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy |
title_sort | ethical and social values for paediatric health technology assessment and drug policy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801223 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.144 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT denburgavrame ethicalandsocialvaluesforpaediatrichealthtechnologyassessmentanddrugpolicy AT giacominimita ethicalandsocialvaluesforpaediatrichealthtechnologyassessmentanddrugpolicy AT ungarwendy ethicalandsocialvaluesforpaediatrichealthtechnologyassessmentanddrugpolicy AT abelsonjulia ethicalandsocialvaluesforpaediatrichealthtechnologyassessmentanddrugpolicy |