Cargando…
Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency
BACKGROUND: Public health newborn screening (NBS) programs continuously evolve, taking advantage of international shared learning. NBS for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) has recently been introduced in many countries. However, comparison of screening outcomes has been hampered by use of dis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.026 |
_version_ | 1784746227289554944 |
---|---|
author | Blom, Maartje Zetterstroöm, Rolf H. Stray-Pedersen, Asbjørg Gilmour, Kimberly Gennery, Andrew R. Puck, Jennifer M. van der Burg, Mirjam |
author_facet | Blom, Maartje Zetterstroöm, Rolf H. Stray-Pedersen, Asbjørg Gilmour, Kimberly Gennery, Andrew R. Puck, Jennifer M. van der Burg, Mirjam |
author_sort | Blom, Maartje |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Public health newborn screening (NBS) programs continuously evolve, taking advantage of international shared learning. NBS for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) has recently been introduced in many countries. However, comparison of screening outcomes has been hampered by use of disparate terminology and imprecise or variable case definitions for non-SCID conditions with T-cell lymphopenia. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether standardized screening terminology could overcome a Babylonian confusion and whether improved case definitions would promote international exchange of knowledge. METHODS: A systematic literature review highlighted the diverse terminology in SCID NBS programs internationally. While, as expected, individual screening strategies and tests were tailored to each program, we found uniform terminology to be lacking in definitions of disease targets, sensitivity, and specificity required for comparisons across programs. RESULTS: The study’s recommendations reflect current evidence from literature and existing guidelines coupled with opinion of experts in public health screening and immunology. Terminologies were aligned. The distinction between actionable and nonactionable T-cell lymphopenia among non-SCID cases was clarified, the former being infants with T-cell lymphopenia who could benefit from interventions such as protection from infections, antibiotic prophylaxis, and live-attenuated vaccine avoidance. CONCLUSIONS: By bringing together the previously unconnected public health screening community and clinical immunology community, these SCID NBS deliberations bridged the gaps in language and perspective between these disciplines. This study proposes that international specialists in each disorder for which NBS is performed join forces to hone their definitions and recommend uniform registration of outcomes of NBS. Standardization of terminology will promote international exchange of knowledge and optimize each phase of NBS and follow-up care, advancing health outcomes for children worldwide. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9278646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92786462023-04-01 Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency Blom, Maartje Zetterstroöm, Rolf H. Stray-Pedersen, Asbjørg Gilmour, Kimberly Gennery, Andrew R. Puck, Jennifer M. van der Burg, Mirjam J Allergy Clin Immunol Article BACKGROUND: Public health newborn screening (NBS) programs continuously evolve, taking advantage of international shared learning. NBS for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) has recently been introduced in many countries. However, comparison of screening outcomes has been hampered by use of disparate terminology and imprecise or variable case definitions for non-SCID conditions with T-cell lymphopenia. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether standardized screening terminology could overcome a Babylonian confusion and whether improved case definitions would promote international exchange of knowledge. METHODS: A systematic literature review highlighted the diverse terminology in SCID NBS programs internationally. While, as expected, individual screening strategies and tests were tailored to each program, we found uniform terminology to be lacking in definitions of disease targets, sensitivity, and specificity required for comparisons across programs. RESULTS: The study’s recommendations reflect current evidence from literature and existing guidelines coupled with opinion of experts in public health screening and immunology. Terminologies were aligned. The distinction between actionable and nonactionable T-cell lymphopenia among non-SCID cases was clarified, the former being infants with T-cell lymphopenia who could benefit from interventions such as protection from infections, antibiotic prophylaxis, and live-attenuated vaccine avoidance. CONCLUSIONS: By bringing together the previously unconnected public health screening community and clinical immunology community, these SCID NBS deliberations bridged the gaps in language and perspective between these disciplines. This study proposes that international specialists in each disorder for which NBS is performed join forces to hone their definitions and recommend uniform registration of outcomes of NBS. Standardization of terminology will promote international exchange of knowledge and optimize each phase of NBS and follow-up care, advancing health outcomes for children worldwide. 2022-04 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9278646/ /pubmed/34537207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.026 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Blom, Maartje Zetterstroöm, Rolf H. Stray-Pedersen, Asbjørg Gilmour, Kimberly Gennery, Andrew R. Puck, Jennifer M. van der Burg, Mirjam Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency |
title | Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency |
title_full | Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency |
title_fullStr | Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency |
title_full_unstemmed | Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency |
title_short | Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency |
title_sort | recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blommaartje recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency AT zetterstroomrolfh recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency AT straypedersenasbjørg recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency AT gilmourkimberly recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency AT genneryandrewr recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency AT puckjenniferm recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency AT vanderburgmirjam recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency |