Cargando…

Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency

BACKGROUND: Public health newborn screening (NBS) programs continuously evolve, taking advantage of international shared learning. NBS for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) has recently been introduced in many countries. However, comparison of screening outcomes has been hampered by use of dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blom, Maartje, Zetterstroöm, Rolf H., Stray-Pedersen, Asbjørg, Gilmour, Kimberly, Gennery, Andrew R., Puck, Jennifer M., van der Burg, Mirjam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.026
_version_ 1784746227289554944
author Blom, Maartje
Zetterstroöm, Rolf H.
Stray-Pedersen, Asbjørg
Gilmour, Kimberly
Gennery, Andrew R.
Puck, Jennifer M.
van der Burg, Mirjam
author_facet Blom, Maartje
Zetterstroöm, Rolf H.
Stray-Pedersen, Asbjørg
Gilmour, Kimberly
Gennery, Andrew R.
Puck, Jennifer M.
van der Burg, Mirjam
author_sort Blom, Maartje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public health newborn screening (NBS) programs continuously evolve, taking advantage of international shared learning. NBS for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) has recently been introduced in many countries. However, comparison of screening outcomes has been hampered by use of disparate terminology and imprecise or variable case definitions for non-SCID conditions with T-cell lymphopenia. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether standardized screening terminology could overcome a Babylonian confusion and whether improved case definitions would promote international exchange of knowledge. METHODS: A systematic literature review highlighted the diverse terminology in SCID NBS programs internationally. While, as expected, individual screening strategies and tests were tailored to each program, we found uniform terminology to be lacking in definitions of disease targets, sensitivity, and specificity required for comparisons across programs. RESULTS: The study’s recommendations reflect current evidence from literature and existing guidelines coupled with opinion of experts in public health screening and immunology. Terminologies were aligned. The distinction between actionable and nonactionable T-cell lymphopenia among non-SCID cases was clarified, the former being infants with T-cell lymphopenia who could benefit from interventions such as protection from infections, antibiotic prophylaxis, and live-attenuated vaccine avoidance. CONCLUSIONS: By bringing together the previously unconnected public health screening community and clinical immunology community, these SCID NBS deliberations bridged the gaps in language and perspective between these disciplines. This study proposes that international specialists in each disorder for which NBS is performed join forces to hone their definitions and recommend uniform registration of outcomes of NBS. Standardization of terminology will promote international exchange of knowledge and optimize each phase of NBS and follow-up care, advancing health outcomes for children worldwide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9278646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92786462023-04-01 Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency Blom, Maartje Zetterstroöm, Rolf H. Stray-Pedersen, Asbjørg Gilmour, Kimberly Gennery, Andrew R. Puck, Jennifer M. van der Burg, Mirjam J Allergy Clin Immunol Article BACKGROUND: Public health newborn screening (NBS) programs continuously evolve, taking advantage of international shared learning. NBS for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) has recently been introduced in many countries. However, comparison of screening outcomes has been hampered by use of disparate terminology and imprecise or variable case definitions for non-SCID conditions with T-cell lymphopenia. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether standardized screening terminology could overcome a Babylonian confusion and whether improved case definitions would promote international exchange of knowledge. METHODS: A systematic literature review highlighted the diverse terminology in SCID NBS programs internationally. While, as expected, individual screening strategies and tests were tailored to each program, we found uniform terminology to be lacking in definitions of disease targets, sensitivity, and specificity required for comparisons across programs. RESULTS: The study’s recommendations reflect current evidence from literature and existing guidelines coupled with opinion of experts in public health screening and immunology. Terminologies were aligned. The distinction between actionable and nonactionable T-cell lymphopenia among non-SCID cases was clarified, the former being infants with T-cell lymphopenia who could benefit from interventions such as protection from infections, antibiotic prophylaxis, and live-attenuated vaccine avoidance. CONCLUSIONS: By bringing together the previously unconnected public health screening community and clinical immunology community, these SCID NBS deliberations bridged the gaps in language and perspective between these disciplines. This study proposes that international specialists in each disorder for which NBS is performed join forces to hone their definitions and recommend uniform registration of outcomes of NBS. Standardization of terminology will promote international exchange of knowledge and optimize each phase of NBS and follow-up care, advancing health outcomes for children worldwide. 2022-04 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9278646/ /pubmed/34537207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.026 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Blom, Maartje
Zetterstroöm, Rolf H.
Stray-Pedersen, Asbjørg
Gilmour, Kimberly
Gennery, Andrew R.
Puck, Jennifer M.
van der Burg, Mirjam
Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency
title Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency
title_full Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency
title_fullStr Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency
title_short Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency
title_sort recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.026
work_keys_str_mv AT blommaartje recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency
AT zetterstroomrolfh recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency
AT straypedersenasbjørg recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency
AT gilmourkimberly recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency
AT genneryandrewr recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency
AT puckjenniferm recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency
AT vanderburgmirjam recommendationsforuniformdefinitionsusedinnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency