Cargando…

Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators

PURPOSE: To better meet clinical needs and facilitate optimal treatment planning, we added two new electron energy beams (7 and 11 MeV) to two Varian TrueBeam linacs. METHODS: We worked with the vendor to create two additional customized electron energies without hardware modifications. For each bea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Song, Muruganandham, Manickam, Du, Weiliang, Ohrt, Jared, Kudchadker, Rajat J., Balter, Peter A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35533212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13633
_version_ 1784746232601640960
author Gao, Song
Muruganandham, Manickam
Du, Weiliang
Ohrt, Jared
Kudchadker, Rajat J.
Balter, Peter A.
author_facet Gao, Song
Muruganandham, Manickam
Du, Weiliang
Ohrt, Jared
Kudchadker, Rajat J.
Balter, Peter A.
author_sort Gao, Song
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To better meet clinical needs and facilitate optimal treatment planning, we added two new electron energy beams (7 and 11 MeV) to two Varian TrueBeam linacs. METHODS: We worked with the vendor to create two additional customized electron energies without hardware modifications. For each beam, we set the bending magnet current and then optimized other beam‐specific parameters to achieve depths of 50% ionization (I (50)) of 2.9 cm for 7 MeV and 4.2 cm for the 11 MeV beam with the 15 × 15 cm(2) cone at 100 cm source‐to‐surface distance (SSD) by using an ionization chamber profiler (ICP) with a double‐wedge (DW) phantom. Beams were steered and balanced to optimize symmetry with the ICP. After all parameters were set, full commissioning was done including measuring beam profiles, percent depth doses (PDDs), output factors (OFs) at standard, and extended SSDs. Measured data were compared between the two linacs and against the values calculated by our RayStation treatment planning system (TPS) following Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a (MPPG 5.a) guidelines. RESULTS: The I (50) values initially determined with the ICP/DW agreed with those from a PDD‐scanned in‐water phantom within 0.2 mm for the 7 and 11 MeV on both linacs. Comparison of the beam characteristics from the two linacs indicated that flatness and symmetry agreed within 0.4%, and point‐by‐point differences in PDD were within 0.01% ± 0.3% for the 7 MeV and 0.01% ± 0.3% for the 11 MeV. The OF ratios between the two linacs were 1.000 ± 0.007 for the 7 MeV and 1.004 ± 0.007 for the 11 MeV. Agreement between TPS‐calculated outputs and measurements were −0.1% ± 1.0% for the 7 MeV and 0.2% ± 0.8% for the 11 MeV. All other parameters met the MPPG 5.a's 3%/3‐mm criteria. CONCLUSION: We were able to add two new beam energies with no hardware modifications. Tuning of the new beams was facilitated by the ICP/DW system allowing us to have the procedures done in a few hours and achieve highly consistent results across two linacs. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9278672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92786722022-07-15 Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators Gao, Song Muruganandham, Manickam Du, Weiliang Ohrt, Jared Kudchadker, Rajat J. Balter, Peter A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements PURPOSE: To better meet clinical needs and facilitate optimal treatment planning, we added two new electron energy beams (7 and 11 MeV) to two Varian TrueBeam linacs. METHODS: We worked with the vendor to create two additional customized electron energies without hardware modifications. For each beam, we set the bending magnet current and then optimized other beam‐specific parameters to achieve depths of 50% ionization (I (50)) of 2.9 cm for 7 MeV and 4.2 cm for the 11 MeV beam with the 15 × 15 cm(2) cone at 100 cm source‐to‐surface distance (SSD) by using an ionization chamber profiler (ICP) with a double‐wedge (DW) phantom. Beams were steered and balanced to optimize symmetry with the ICP. After all parameters were set, full commissioning was done including measuring beam profiles, percent depth doses (PDDs), output factors (OFs) at standard, and extended SSDs. Measured data were compared between the two linacs and against the values calculated by our RayStation treatment planning system (TPS) following Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a (MPPG 5.a) guidelines. RESULTS: The I (50) values initially determined with the ICP/DW agreed with those from a PDD‐scanned in‐water phantom within 0.2 mm for the 7 and 11 MeV on both linacs. Comparison of the beam characteristics from the two linacs indicated that flatness and symmetry agreed within 0.4%, and point‐by‐point differences in PDD were within 0.01% ± 0.3% for the 7 MeV and 0.01% ± 0.3% for the 11 MeV. The OF ratios between the two linacs were 1.000 ± 0.007 for the 7 MeV and 1.004 ± 0.007 for the 11 MeV. Agreement between TPS‐calculated outputs and measurements were −0.1% ± 1.0% for the 7 MeV and 0.2% ± 0.8% for the 11 MeV. All other parameters met the MPPG 5.a's 3%/3‐mm criteria. CONCLUSION: We were able to add two new beam energies with no hardware modifications. Tuning of the new beams was facilitated by the ICP/DW system allowing us to have the procedures done in a few hours and achieve highly consistent results across two linacs. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9278672/ /pubmed/35533212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13633 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Gao, Song
Muruganandham, Manickam
Du, Weiliang
Ohrt, Jared
Kudchadker, Rajat J.
Balter, Peter A.
Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators
title Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators
title_full Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators
title_fullStr Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators
title_full_unstemmed Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators
title_short Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators
title_sort adding customized electron energy beams to truebeam linear accelerators
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35533212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13633
work_keys_str_mv AT gaosong addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators
AT muruganandhammanickam addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators
AT duweiliang addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators
AT ohrtjared addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators
AT kudchadkerrajatj addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators
AT balterpetera addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators