Cargando…
Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators
PURPOSE: To better meet clinical needs and facilitate optimal treatment planning, we added two new electron energy beams (7 and 11 MeV) to two Varian TrueBeam linacs. METHODS: We worked with the vendor to create two additional customized electron energies without hardware modifications. For each bea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35533212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13633 |
_version_ | 1784746232601640960 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Song Muruganandham, Manickam Du, Weiliang Ohrt, Jared Kudchadker, Rajat J. Balter, Peter A. |
author_facet | Gao, Song Muruganandham, Manickam Du, Weiliang Ohrt, Jared Kudchadker, Rajat J. Balter, Peter A. |
author_sort | Gao, Song |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To better meet clinical needs and facilitate optimal treatment planning, we added two new electron energy beams (7 and 11 MeV) to two Varian TrueBeam linacs. METHODS: We worked with the vendor to create two additional customized electron energies without hardware modifications. For each beam, we set the bending magnet current and then optimized other beam‐specific parameters to achieve depths of 50% ionization (I (50)) of 2.9 cm for 7 MeV and 4.2 cm for the 11 MeV beam with the 15 × 15 cm(2) cone at 100 cm source‐to‐surface distance (SSD) by using an ionization chamber profiler (ICP) with a double‐wedge (DW) phantom. Beams were steered and balanced to optimize symmetry with the ICP. After all parameters were set, full commissioning was done including measuring beam profiles, percent depth doses (PDDs), output factors (OFs) at standard, and extended SSDs. Measured data were compared between the two linacs and against the values calculated by our RayStation treatment planning system (TPS) following Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a (MPPG 5.a) guidelines. RESULTS: The I (50) values initially determined with the ICP/DW agreed with those from a PDD‐scanned in‐water phantom within 0.2 mm for the 7 and 11 MeV on both linacs. Comparison of the beam characteristics from the two linacs indicated that flatness and symmetry agreed within 0.4%, and point‐by‐point differences in PDD were within 0.01% ± 0.3% for the 7 MeV and 0.01% ± 0.3% for the 11 MeV. The OF ratios between the two linacs were 1.000 ± 0.007 for the 7 MeV and 1.004 ± 0.007 for the 11 MeV. Agreement between TPS‐calculated outputs and measurements were −0.1% ± 1.0% for the 7 MeV and 0.2% ± 0.8% for the 11 MeV. All other parameters met the MPPG 5.a's 3%/3‐mm criteria. CONCLUSION: We were able to add two new beam energies with no hardware modifications. Tuning of the new beams was facilitated by the ICP/DW system allowing us to have the procedures done in a few hours and achieve highly consistent results across two linacs. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9278672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92786722022-07-15 Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators Gao, Song Muruganandham, Manickam Du, Weiliang Ohrt, Jared Kudchadker, Rajat J. Balter, Peter A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements PURPOSE: To better meet clinical needs and facilitate optimal treatment planning, we added two new electron energy beams (7 and 11 MeV) to two Varian TrueBeam linacs. METHODS: We worked with the vendor to create two additional customized electron energies without hardware modifications. For each beam, we set the bending magnet current and then optimized other beam‐specific parameters to achieve depths of 50% ionization (I (50)) of 2.9 cm for 7 MeV and 4.2 cm for the 11 MeV beam with the 15 × 15 cm(2) cone at 100 cm source‐to‐surface distance (SSD) by using an ionization chamber profiler (ICP) with a double‐wedge (DW) phantom. Beams were steered and balanced to optimize symmetry with the ICP. After all parameters were set, full commissioning was done including measuring beam profiles, percent depth doses (PDDs), output factors (OFs) at standard, and extended SSDs. Measured data were compared between the two linacs and against the values calculated by our RayStation treatment planning system (TPS) following Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a (MPPG 5.a) guidelines. RESULTS: The I (50) values initially determined with the ICP/DW agreed with those from a PDD‐scanned in‐water phantom within 0.2 mm for the 7 and 11 MeV on both linacs. Comparison of the beam characteristics from the two linacs indicated that flatness and symmetry agreed within 0.4%, and point‐by‐point differences in PDD were within 0.01% ± 0.3% for the 7 MeV and 0.01% ± 0.3% for the 11 MeV. The OF ratios between the two linacs were 1.000 ± 0.007 for the 7 MeV and 1.004 ± 0.007 for the 11 MeV. Agreement between TPS‐calculated outputs and measurements were −0.1% ± 1.0% for the 7 MeV and 0.2% ± 0.8% for the 11 MeV. All other parameters met the MPPG 5.a's 3%/3‐mm criteria. CONCLUSION: We were able to add two new beam energies with no hardware modifications. Tuning of the new beams was facilitated by the ICP/DW system allowing us to have the procedures done in a few hours and achieve highly consistent results across two linacs. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9278672/ /pubmed/35533212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13633 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Measurements Gao, Song Muruganandham, Manickam Du, Weiliang Ohrt, Jared Kudchadker, Rajat J. Balter, Peter A. Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators |
title | Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators |
title_full | Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators |
title_fullStr | Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators |
title_full_unstemmed | Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators |
title_short | Adding customized electron energy beams to TrueBeam linear accelerators |
title_sort | adding customized electron energy beams to truebeam linear accelerators |
topic | Radiation Measurements |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35533212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaosong addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators AT muruganandhammanickam addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators AT duweiliang addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators AT ohrtjared addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators AT kudchadkerrajatj addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators AT balterpetera addingcustomizedelectronenergybeamstotruebeamlinearaccelerators |