Cargando…

Predictors of human-infective RNA virus discovery in the United States, China, and Africa, an ecological study

BACKGROUND: The variation in the pathogen type as well as the spatial heterogeneity of predictors make the generality of any associations with pathogen discovery debatable. Our previous work confirmed that the association of a group of predictors differed across different types of RNA viruses, yet t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Feifei, Chase-Topping, Margo, Guo, Chuan-Guo, Woolhouse, Mark EJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35666108
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72123
_version_ 1784746287802875904
author Zhang, Feifei
Chase-Topping, Margo
Guo, Chuan-Guo
Woolhouse, Mark EJ
author_facet Zhang, Feifei
Chase-Topping, Margo
Guo, Chuan-Guo
Woolhouse, Mark EJ
author_sort Zhang, Feifei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The variation in the pathogen type as well as the spatial heterogeneity of predictors make the generality of any associations with pathogen discovery debatable. Our previous work confirmed that the association of a group of predictors differed across different types of RNA viruses, yet there have been no previous comparisons of the specific predictors for RNA virus discovery in different regions. The aim of the current study was to close the gap by investigating whether predictors of discovery rates within three regions—the United States, China, and Africa—differ from one another and from those at the global level. METHODS: Based on a comprehensive list of human-infective RNA viruses, we collated published data on first discovery of each species in each region. We used a Poisson boosted regression tree (BRT) model to examine the relationship between virus discovery and 33 predictors representing climate, socio-economics, land use, and biodiversity across each region separately. The discovery probability in three regions in 2010–2019 was mapped using the fitted models and historical predictors. RESULTS: The numbers of human-infective virus species discovered in the United States, China, and Africa up to 2019 were 95, 80, and 107 respectively, with China lagging behind the other two regions. In each region, discoveries were clustered in hotspots. BRT modelling suggested that in all three regions RNA virus discovery was better predicted by land use and socio-economic variables than climatic variables and biodiversity, although the relative importance of these predictors varied by region. Map of virus discovery probability in 2010–2019 indicated several new hotspots outside historical high-risk areas. Most new virus species since 2010 in each region (6/6 in the United States, 19/19 in China, 12/19 in Africa) were discovered in high-risk areas as predicted by our model. CONCLUSIONS: The drivers of spatiotemporal variation in virus discovery rates vary in different regions of the world. Within regions virus discovery is driven mainly by land-use and socio-economic variables; climate and biodiversity variables are consistently less important predictors than at a global scale. Potential new discovery hotspots in 2010–2019 are identified. Results from the study could guide active surveillance for new human-infective viruses in local high-risk areas. FUNDING: FFZ is funded by the Darwin Trust of Edinburgh (https://darwintrust.bio.ed.ac.uk/). MEJW has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 874735 (VEO) (https://www.veo-europe.eu/).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9278958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92789582022-07-14 Predictors of human-infective RNA virus discovery in the United States, China, and Africa, an ecological study Zhang, Feifei Chase-Topping, Margo Guo, Chuan-Guo Woolhouse, Mark EJ eLife Ecology BACKGROUND: The variation in the pathogen type as well as the spatial heterogeneity of predictors make the generality of any associations with pathogen discovery debatable. Our previous work confirmed that the association of a group of predictors differed across different types of RNA viruses, yet there have been no previous comparisons of the specific predictors for RNA virus discovery in different regions. The aim of the current study was to close the gap by investigating whether predictors of discovery rates within three regions—the United States, China, and Africa—differ from one another and from those at the global level. METHODS: Based on a comprehensive list of human-infective RNA viruses, we collated published data on first discovery of each species in each region. We used a Poisson boosted regression tree (BRT) model to examine the relationship between virus discovery and 33 predictors representing climate, socio-economics, land use, and biodiversity across each region separately. The discovery probability in three regions in 2010–2019 was mapped using the fitted models and historical predictors. RESULTS: The numbers of human-infective virus species discovered in the United States, China, and Africa up to 2019 were 95, 80, and 107 respectively, with China lagging behind the other two regions. In each region, discoveries were clustered in hotspots. BRT modelling suggested that in all three regions RNA virus discovery was better predicted by land use and socio-economic variables than climatic variables and biodiversity, although the relative importance of these predictors varied by region. Map of virus discovery probability in 2010–2019 indicated several new hotspots outside historical high-risk areas. Most new virus species since 2010 in each region (6/6 in the United States, 19/19 in China, 12/19 in Africa) were discovered in high-risk areas as predicted by our model. CONCLUSIONS: The drivers of spatiotemporal variation in virus discovery rates vary in different regions of the world. Within regions virus discovery is driven mainly by land-use and socio-economic variables; climate and biodiversity variables are consistently less important predictors than at a global scale. Potential new discovery hotspots in 2010–2019 are identified. Results from the study could guide active surveillance for new human-infective viruses in local high-risk areas. FUNDING: FFZ is funded by the Darwin Trust of Edinburgh (https://darwintrust.bio.ed.ac.uk/). MEJW has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 874735 (VEO) (https://www.veo-europe.eu/). eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9278958/ /pubmed/35666108 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72123 Text en © 2022, Zhang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Zhang, Feifei
Chase-Topping, Margo
Guo, Chuan-Guo
Woolhouse, Mark EJ
Predictors of human-infective RNA virus discovery in the United States, China, and Africa, an ecological study
title Predictors of human-infective RNA virus discovery in the United States, China, and Africa, an ecological study
title_full Predictors of human-infective RNA virus discovery in the United States, China, and Africa, an ecological study
title_fullStr Predictors of human-infective RNA virus discovery in the United States, China, and Africa, an ecological study
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of human-infective RNA virus discovery in the United States, China, and Africa, an ecological study
title_short Predictors of human-infective RNA virus discovery in the United States, China, and Africa, an ecological study
title_sort predictors of human-infective rna virus discovery in the united states, china, and africa, an ecological study
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35666108
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72123
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangfeifei predictorsofhumaninfectivernavirusdiscoveryintheunitedstateschinaandafricaanecologicalstudy
AT chasetoppingmargo predictorsofhumaninfectivernavirusdiscoveryintheunitedstateschinaandafricaanecologicalstudy
AT guochuanguo predictorsofhumaninfectivernavirusdiscoveryintheunitedstateschinaandafricaanecologicalstudy
AT woolhousemarkej predictorsofhumaninfectivernavirusdiscoveryintheunitedstateschinaandafricaanecologicalstudy