Cargando…
The 2019–2020 Australian forest fires are a harbinger of decreased prescribed burning effectiveness under rising extreme conditions
There is an imperative for fire agencies to quantify the potential for prescribed burning to mitigate risk to life, property and environmental values while facing changing climates. The 2019–2020 Black Summer fires in eastern Australia raised questions about the effectiveness of prescribed burning i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15262-y |
_version_ | 1784746367665569792 |
---|---|
author | Clarke, Hamish Cirulis, Brett Penman, Trent Price, Owen Boer, Matthias M. Bradstock, Ross |
author_facet | Clarke, Hamish Cirulis, Brett Penman, Trent Price, Owen Boer, Matthias M. Bradstock, Ross |
author_sort | Clarke, Hamish |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is an imperative for fire agencies to quantify the potential for prescribed burning to mitigate risk to life, property and environmental values while facing changing climates. The 2019–2020 Black Summer fires in eastern Australia raised questions about the effectiveness of prescribed burning in mitigating risk under unprecedented fire conditions. We performed a simulation experiment to test the effects of different rates of prescribed burning treatment on risks posed by wildfire to life, property and infrastructure. In four forested case study landscapes, we found that the risks posed by wildfire were substantially higher under the fire weather conditions of the 2019–2020 season, compared to the full range of long-term historic weather conditions. For area burnt and house loss, the 2019–2020 conditions resulted in more than a doubling of residual risk across the four landscapes, regardless of treatment rate (mean increase of 230%, range 164–360%). Fire managers must prepare for a higher level of residual risk as climate change increases the likelihood of similar or even more dangerous fire seasons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9279303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92793032022-07-15 The 2019–2020 Australian forest fires are a harbinger of decreased prescribed burning effectiveness under rising extreme conditions Clarke, Hamish Cirulis, Brett Penman, Trent Price, Owen Boer, Matthias M. Bradstock, Ross Sci Rep Article There is an imperative for fire agencies to quantify the potential for prescribed burning to mitigate risk to life, property and environmental values while facing changing climates. The 2019–2020 Black Summer fires in eastern Australia raised questions about the effectiveness of prescribed burning in mitigating risk under unprecedented fire conditions. We performed a simulation experiment to test the effects of different rates of prescribed burning treatment on risks posed by wildfire to life, property and infrastructure. In four forested case study landscapes, we found that the risks posed by wildfire were substantially higher under the fire weather conditions of the 2019–2020 season, compared to the full range of long-term historic weather conditions. For area burnt and house loss, the 2019–2020 conditions resulted in more than a doubling of residual risk across the four landscapes, regardless of treatment rate (mean increase of 230%, range 164–360%). Fire managers must prepare for a higher level of residual risk as climate change increases the likelihood of similar or even more dangerous fire seasons. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9279303/ /pubmed/35831432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15262-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Clarke, Hamish Cirulis, Brett Penman, Trent Price, Owen Boer, Matthias M. Bradstock, Ross The 2019–2020 Australian forest fires are a harbinger of decreased prescribed burning effectiveness under rising extreme conditions |
title | The 2019–2020 Australian forest fires are a harbinger of decreased prescribed burning effectiveness under rising extreme conditions |
title_full | The 2019–2020 Australian forest fires are a harbinger of decreased prescribed burning effectiveness under rising extreme conditions |
title_fullStr | The 2019–2020 Australian forest fires are a harbinger of decreased prescribed burning effectiveness under rising extreme conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | The 2019–2020 Australian forest fires are a harbinger of decreased prescribed burning effectiveness under rising extreme conditions |
title_short | The 2019–2020 Australian forest fires are a harbinger of decreased prescribed burning effectiveness under rising extreme conditions |
title_sort | 2019–2020 australian forest fires are a harbinger of decreased prescribed burning effectiveness under rising extreme conditions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15262-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkehamish the20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions AT cirulisbrett the20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions AT penmantrent the20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions AT priceowen the20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions AT boermatthiasm the20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions AT bradstockross the20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions AT clarkehamish 20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions AT cirulisbrett 20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions AT penmantrent 20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions AT priceowen 20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions AT boermatthiasm 20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions AT bradstockross 20192020australianforestfiresareaharbingerofdecreasedprescribedburningeffectivenessunderrisingextremeconditions |