Cargando…

Comparison of resistive capacitive energy transfer therapy on cadaveric molars and incisors with and without implants

Capacitive–resistive energy transfer therapy (CRet) is used to improve the rehabilitation of different injuries. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the changes in temperature and current flow during different CRet applications on upper and lower molars and incisors, with and without implants,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert, Caballé-Serrano, Jordi, Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo, Hidalgo-García, César, González-Rueda, Vanessa, Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi, Zegarra-Chávez, Daniel, López-de-Celis, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16189-0
_version_ 1784746395169718272
author Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
Caballé-Serrano, Jordi
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Hidalgo-García, César
González-Rueda, Vanessa
Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi
Zegarra-Chávez, Daniel
López-de-Celis, Carlos
author_facet Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
Caballé-Serrano, Jordi
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Hidalgo-García, César
González-Rueda, Vanessa
Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi
Zegarra-Chávez, Daniel
López-de-Celis, Carlos
author_sort Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
collection PubMed
description Capacitive–resistive energy transfer therapy (CRet) is used to improve the rehabilitation of different injuries. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the changes in temperature and current flow during different CRet applications on upper and lower molars and incisors, with and without implants, on ten cryopreserved corpses. Temperatures were taken on molars and incisors with invasive devices and skin temperature was taken with a digital thermometer at the beginning and after treatments. Four interventions: 15 VA capacitive hypothermic (CAPH), 8 watts resistive (RES8), 20 watts resistive (RES20) and 75 VA capacitive (CAP75) were performed for 5 min each. All treatments in this study generated current flow (more than 0.00005 A/m(2)) and did not generate a significant temperature increase (p > 0.05). However, RES20 application slightly increased surface temperature on incisors without implants (p = 0.010), and molar with (p = 0.001) and without implant (p = 0.008). Also, CAP75 application increased surface temperature on molars with implant (p = 0.002) and upper incisor with implant (p = 0.001). In conclusion, RES8 and CAPH applications seem to be the best options to achieve current flow without an increase in temperature on molars and incisors with and without implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9279425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92794252022-07-15 Comparison of resistive capacitive energy transfer therapy on cadaveric molars and incisors with and without implants Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Caballé-Serrano, Jordi Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Hidalgo-García, César González-Rueda, Vanessa Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi Zegarra-Chávez, Daniel López-de-Celis, Carlos Sci Rep Article Capacitive–resistive energy transfer therapy (CRet) is used to improve the rehabilitation of different injuries. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the changes in temperature and current flow during different CRet applications on upper and lower molars and incisors, with and without implants, on ten cryopreserved corpses. Temperatures were taken on molars and incisors with invasive devices and skin temperature was taken with a digital thermometer at the beginning and after treatments. Four interventions: 15 VA capacitive hypothermic (CAPH), 8 watts resistive (RES8), 20 watts resistive (RES20) and 75 VA capacitive (CAP75) were performed for 5 min each. All treatments in this study generated current flow (more than 0.00005 A/m(2)) and did not generate a significant temperature increase (p > 0.05). However, RES20 application slightly increased surface temperature on incisors without implants (p = 0.010), and molar with (p = 0.001) and without implant (p = 0.008). Also, CAP75 application increased surface temperature on molars with implant (p = 0.002) and upper incisor with implant (p = 0.001). In conclusion, RES8 and CAPH applications seem to be the best options to achieve current flow without an increase in temperature on molars and incisors with and without implants. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9279425/ /pubmed/35831354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16189-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
Caballé-Serrano, Jordi
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Hidalgo-García, César
González-Rueda, Vanessa
Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi
Zegarra-Chávez, Daniel
López-de-Celis, Carlos
Comparison of resistive capacitive energy transfer therapy on cadaveric molars and incisors with and without implants
title Comparison of resistive capacitive energy transfer therapy on cadaveric molars and incisors with and without implants
title_full Comparison of resistive capacitive energy transfer therapy on cadaveric molars and incisors with and without implants
title_fullStr Comparison of resistive capacitive energy transfer therapy on cadaveric molars and incisors with and without implants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of resistive capacitive energy transfer therapy on cadaveric molars and incisors with and without implants
title_short Comparison of resistive capacitive energy transfer therapy on cadaveric molars and incisors with and without implants
title_sort comparison of resistive capacitive energy transfer therapy on cadaveric molars and incisors with and without implants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16189-0
work_keys_str_mv AT perezbellmuntalbert comparisonofresistivecapacitiveenergytransfertherapyoncadavericmolarsandincisorswithandwithoutimplants
AT caballeserranojordi comparisonofresistivecapacitiveenergytransfertherapyoncadavericmolarsandincisorswithandwithoutimplants
AT rodriguezsanzjacobo comparisonofresistivecapacitiveenergytransfertherapyoncadavericmolarsandincisorswithandwithoutimplants
AT hidalgogarciacesar comparisonofresistivecapacitiveenergytransfertherapyoncadavericmolarsandincisorswithandwithoutimplants
AT gonzalezruedavanessa comparisonofresistivecapacitiveenergytransfertherapyoncadavericmolarsandincisorswithandwithoutimplants
AT gassovillarejosergi comparisonofresistivecapacitiveenergytransfertherapyoncadavericmolarsandincisorswithandwithoutimplants
AT zegarrachavezdaniel comparisonofresistivecapacitiveenergytransfertherapyoncadavericmolarsandincisorswithandwithoutimplants
AT lopezdeceliscarlos comparisonofresistivecapacitiveenergytransfertherapyoncadavericmolarsandincisorswithandwithoutimplants