Cargando…

Comparing In-ear EOG for Eye-Movement Estimation With Eye-Tracking: Accuracy, Calibration, and Speech Comprehension

This presentation details and evaluates a method for estimating the attended speaker during a two-person conversation by means of in-ear electro-oculography (EOG). Twenty-five hearing-impaired participants were fitted with molds equipped with EOG electrodes (in-ear EOG) and wore eye-tracking glasses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skoglund, Martin A., Andersen, Martin, Shiell, Martha M., Keidser, Gitte, Rank, Mike Lind, Rotger-Griful, Sergi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35844213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.873201
_version_ 1784746427756314624
author Skoglund, Martin A.
Andersen, Martin
Shiell, Martha M.
Keidser, Gitte
Rank, Mike Lind
Rotger-Griful, Sergi
author_facet Skoglund, Martin A.
Andersen, Martin
Shiell, Martha M.
Keidser, Gitte
Rank, Mike Lind
Rotger-Griful, Sergi
author_sort Skoglund, Martin A.
collection PubMed
description This presentation details and evaluates a method for estimating the attended speaker during a two-person conversation by means of in-ear electro-oculography (EOG). Twenty-five hearing-impaired participants were fitted with molds equipped with EOG electrodes (in-ear EOG) and wore eye-tracking glasses while watching a video of two life-size people in a dialog solving a Diapix task. The dialogue was directionally presented and together with background noise in the frontal hemisphere at 60 dB SPL. During three conditions of steering (none, in-ear EOG, conventional eye-tracking), participants' comprehension was periodically measured using multiple-choice questions. Based on eye movement detection by in-ear EOG or conventional eye-tracking, the estimated attended speaker was amplified by 6 dB. In the in-ear EOG condition, the estimate was based on one selected channel pair of electrodes out of 36 possible electrodes. A novel calibration procedure introducing three different metrics was used to select the measurement channel. The in-ear EOG attended speaker estimates were compared to those of the eye-tracker. Across participants, the mean accuracy of in-ear EOG estimation of the attended speaker was 68%, ranging from 50 to 89%. Based on offline simulation, it was established that higher scoring metrics obtained for a channel with the calibration procedure were significantly associated with better data quality. Results showed a statistically significant improvement in comprehension of about 10% in both steering conditions relative to the no-steering condition. Comprehension in the two steering conditions was not significantly different. Further, better comprehension obtained under the in-ear EOG condition was significantly correlated with more accurate estimation of the attended speaker. In conclusion, this study shows promising results in the use of in-ear EOG for visual attention estimation with potential for applicability in hearing assistive devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9279575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92795752022-07-15 Comparing In-ear EOG for Eye-Movement Estimation With Eye-Tracking: Accuracy, Calibration, and Speech Comprehension Skoglund, Martin A. Andersen, Martin Shiell, Martha M. Keidser, Gitte Rank, Mike Lind Rotger-Griful, Sergi Front Neurosci Neuroscience This presentation details and evaluates a method for estimating the attended speaker during a two-person conversation by means of in-ear electro-oculography (EOG). Twenty-five hearing-impaired participants were fitted with molds equipped with EOG electrodes (in-ear EOG) and wore eye-tracking glasses while watching a video of two life-size people in a dialog solving a Diapix task. The dialogue was directionally presented and together with background noise in the frontal hemisphere at 60 dB SPL. During three conditions of steering (none, in-ear EOG, conventional eye-tracking), participants' comprehension was periodically measured using multiple-choice questions. Based on eye movement detection by in-ear EOG or conventional eye-tracking, the estimated attended speaker was amplified by 6 dB. In the in-ear EOG condition, the estimate was based on one selected channel pair of electrodes out of 36 possible electrodes. A novel calibration procedure introducing three different metrics was used to select the measurement channel. The in-ear EOG attended speaker estimates were compared to those of the eye-tracker. Across participants, the mean accuracy of in-ear EOG estimation of the attended speaker was 68%, ranging from 50 to 89%. Based on offline simulation, it was established that higher scoring metrics obtained for a channel with the calibration procedure were significantly associated with better data quality. Results showed a statistically significant improvement in comprehension of about 10% in both steering conditions relative to the no-steering condition. Comprehension in the two steering conditions was not significantly different. Further, better comprehension obtained under the in-ear EOG condition was significantly correlated with more accurate estimation of the attended speaker. In conclusion, this study shows promising results in the use of in-ear EOG for visual attention estimation with potential for applicability in hearing assistive devices. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9279575/ /pubmed/35844213 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.873201 Text en Copyright © 2022 Skoglund, Andersen, Shiell, Keidser, Rank and Rotger-Griful. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Skoglund, Martin A.
Andersen, Martin
Shiell, Martha M.
Keidser, Gitte
Rank, Mike Lind
Rotger-Griful, Sergi
Comparing In-ear EOG for Eye-Movement Estimation With Eye-Tracking: Accuracy, Calibration, and Speech Comprehension
title Comparing In-ear EOG for Eye-Movement Estimation With Eye-Tracking: Accuracy, Calibration, and Speech Comprehension
title_full Comparing In-ear EOG for Eye-Movement Estimation With Eye-Tracking: Accuracy, Calibration, and Speech Comprehension
title_fullStr Comparing In-ear EOG for Eye-Movement Estimation With Eye-Tracking: Accuracy, Calibration, and Speech Comprehension
title_full_unstemmed Comparing In-ear EOG for Eye-Movement Estimation With Eye-Tracking: Accuracy, Calibration, and Speech Comprehension
title_short Comparing In-ear EOG for Eye-Movement Estimation With Eye-Tracking: Accuracy, Calibration, and Speech Comprehension
title_sort comparing in-ear eog for eye-movement estimation with eye-tracking: accuracy, calibration, and speech comprehension
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35844213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.873201
work_keys_str_mv AT skoglundmartina comparingineareogforeyemovementestimationwitheyetrackingaccuracycalibrationandspeechcomprehension
AT andersenmartin comparingineareogforeyemovementestimationwitheyetrackingaccuracycalibrationandspeechcomprehension
AT shiellmartham comparingineareogforeyemovementestimationwitheyetrackingaccuracycalibrationandspeechcomprehension
AT keidsergitte comparingineareogforeyemovementestimationwitheyetrackingaccuracycalibrationandspeechcomprehension
AT rankmikelind comparingineareogforeyemovementestimationwitheyetrackingaccuracycalibrationandspeechcomprehension
AT rotgergrifulsergi comparingineareogforeyemovementestimationwitheyetrackingaccuracycalibrationandspeechcomprehension