Cargando…
Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: There have been lingering controversies reported decompression and plus fusion. And the relative safety of fusion in addition to standard decompression remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of decompression alone or combined with fusion in lumbar spinal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35845482 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-2208 |
_version_ | 1784746485886222336 |
---|---|
author | Shen, Zhubin Guan, Xiaojing Wang, Rui Xue, Qian Zhang, Ding Zong, Yuan Ma, Wenxuan Zhuge, Ruijian Liu, Zhiming He, Changhao Guo, Li Yin, Fei |
author_facet | Shen, Zhubin Guan, Xiaojing Wang, Rui Xue, Qian Zhang, Ding Zong, Yuan Ma, Wenxuan Zhuge, Ruijian Liu, Zhiming He, Changhao Guo, Li Yin, Fei |
author_sort | Shen, Zhubin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There have been lingering controversies reported decompression and plus fusion. And the relative safety of fusion in addition to standard decompression remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of decompression alone or combined with fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for relevant literature from their inception to 28th December 2021. We identified the eligible studies based on the PICOS principles, populations (LSS with DS), interventions (decompression alone), controls (decompression combined with fusion), outcomes [overall reoperation rate, complications, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), operative time, the amount of blood lost, length of stay (LOS), and visual analog scales (VAS)], study design (cohort studies). Quality assessment for individual study was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: In all, 12 articles involving a total of 14,693 patients were finally included in the study, the majority of patients underwent decompression alone (DA group: n=11,598) and the rest underwent decompression associated with fusion (FU group: n=3,095). The quality of most of the included studies was regarded as high quality. The results indicated that the FU group had a higher rate of complication [relative risk (RR): 1.770, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.485 to 2.110], longer operative time [weighted mean difference (WMD): 51.037, 95% CI: 13.743 to 88.330], and increased blood loss (WMD: 258.354, 95% CI: 150.468 to 366.239) than the DA group (all P<0.05), with no significant differences for overall reoperation rate (RR: 0.879, 95% CI: 0.432 to 1.786), ODI (WMD: −2.569, 95% CI: −6.548 to 1.409), LOS (WMD: 3.838, 95% CI: −2.172 to 9.848), and VAS found between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LSS + DS, the effectiveness and safety of decompression alone may be superior to decompression plus fusion in terms of complication rate, operative time, and the amount of bleeding. However, more high-quality literature is needed in the future to confirm the best treatment choice for patients with LSS + DS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9279815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92798152022-07-15 Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Shen, Zhubin Guan, Xiaojing Wang, Rui Xue, Qian Zhang, Ding Zong, Yuan Ma, Wenxuan Zhuge, Ruijian Liu, Zhiming He, Changhao Guo, Li Yin, Fei Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: There have been lingering controversies reported decompression and plus fusion. And the relative safety of fusion in addition to standard decompression remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of decompression alone or combined with fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for relevant literature from their inception to 28th December 2021. We identified the eligible studies based on the PICOS principles, populations (LSS with DS), interventions (decompression alone), controls (decompression combined with fusion), outcomes [overall reoperation rate, complications, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), operative time, the amount of blood lost, length of stay (LOS), and visual analog scales (VAS)], study design (cohort studies). Quality assessment for individual study was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: In all, 12 articles involving a total of 14,693 patients were finally included in the study, the majority of patients underwent decompression alone (DA group: n=11,598) and the rest underwent decompression associated with fusion (FU group: n=3,095). The quality of most of the included studies was regarded as high quality. The results indicated that the FU group had a higher rate of complication [relative risk (RR): 1.770, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.485 to 2.110], longer operative time [weighted mean difference (WMD): 51.037, 95% CI: 13.743 to 88.330], and increased blood loss (WMD: 258.354, 95% CI: 150.468 to 366.239) than the DA group (all P<0.05), with no significant differences for overall reoperation rate (RR: 0.879, 95% CI: 0.432 to 1.786), ODI (WMD: −2.569, 95% CI: −6.548 to 1.409), LOS (WMD: 3.838, 95% CI: −2.172 to 9.848), and VAS found between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LSS + DS, the effectiveness and safety of decompression alone may be superior to decompression plus fusion in terms of complication rate, operative time, and the amount of bleeding. However, more high-quality literature is needed in the future to confirm the best treatment choice for patients with LSS + DS. AME Publishing Company 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9279815/ /pubmed/35845482 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-2208 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shen, Zhubin Guan, Xiaojing Wang, Rui Xue, Qian Zhang, Ding Zong, Yuan Ma, Wenxuan Zhuge, Ruijian Liu, Zhiming He, Changhao Guo, Li Yin, Fei Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35845482 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-2208 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shenzhubin effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guanxiaojing effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangrui effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xueqian effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangding effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zongyuan effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mawenxuan effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhugeruijian effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuzhiming effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hechanghao effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guoli effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yinfei effectivenessandsafetyofdecompressionaloneversusdecompressionplusfusionforlumbarspinalstenosiswithdegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |