Cargando…
Optimal whole blood dilution protocol for preprocessing samples prior to circulating tumor cell capture by size‐based isolation
BACKGROUND: This study compared whole blood dilution versus density gradient centrifugation for pre‐processing blood samples prior to circulating tumor cell (CTC) capture on the efficiency of CTC separation by size‐based isolation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whole blood from a healthy volunteer spiked w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24524 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: This study compared whole blood dilution versus density gradient centrifugation for pre‐processing blood samples prior to circulating tumor cell (CTC) capture on the efficiency of CTC separation by size‐based isolation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whole blood from a healthy volunteer spiked with SKBR3 cells was used to optimize the whole blood dilution protocol for sample volume, dilution ratio, and paraformaldehyde (PFA) concentration. Whole blood from healthy volunteers spiked with SKBR3, A549, or PC3 cells, and whole blood from patients with advanced gastric, esophageal, or liver cancer, was used to compare pre‐processing by the optimal whole blood dilution protocol with density‐gradient centrifugation. All statistical evaluations were performed using Student t test of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 17.0). RESULTS: In blood samples from healthy volunteers, spiked SKBR3 cell recovery rates were highest in 5 ml of whole blood, diluted with 2.5 ml buffer, and fixed with 0.2% PFA, and spiked SKBR3, A549, and PC3 cell recovery rates from 5 ml whole blood were significantly greater when using the optimized whole blood dilution protocol (87.67% ± 1.76%, 79.50% ± 0.50% and 71.83% ± 1.04%, respectively) compared to density‐gradient centrifugation (46.83 ± 1.76%, 37.00 ± 1.50% and 41.00 ± 1.50%, respectively). |
---|